Head-to-head test
EcoFlow RIVER 3 230 vs EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
The MAX costs $250 more, holds two-and-a-half times the energy, and still comes out cheaper per watt-hour, so the 230 earns its keep only when you're counting ounces and dollars.
Full profiles: EcoFlow RIVER 3 230 → · EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX →
Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated
Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
$189.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 56 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
.webp)
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Spec deltas
The RIVER 3 MAX costs $250 more than the 230, and it's the cheaper unit where it counts. You pay $439 instead of $189 and get 572Wh instead of 230, which comes to $0.56 per watt-hour against $0.82, on the same LFP cells and the same 5-year warranty. The bigger box holds the cheaper energy.
The 230 earns its place on two counts: it's the lighter unit, and it asks less up front. If you're carrying it to a campsite to top up a phone, a laptop, and a camera, that lighter, cheaper box is exactly right, and the MAX's bigger battery would just be weight you never draw down.
Most people shopping these two aren't ounce-counting backpackers, though, and the moment a real overnight load enters the picture, a CPAP being the obvious one, the 230 runs out of battery before the night runs out of hours. The MAX doesn't. Unless the budget or the backpack decides it, this comes down to how much you'll actually plug in, and the honest answer for most people is more than 230Wh.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
Capacity
That discount doesn't wash out over time, because both packs carry the same 3,000-cycle rating: the MAX lands at $0.19 per lifetime kilowatt-hour, the 230 at $0.27. Bigger is cheaper here twice over, once at the register and once across the whole life of the pack.
RIVER 3 230: $189 for 230Wh; RIVER 3 MAX: $439 for 572Whboth rated for 3,000 cycles and a 5-year warrantycost per lifetime kWh: $0.27 (230) vs $0.19 (MAX)
Why it mattersIf $439 is reachable and you'll use the watt-hours, the MAX is the cheaper battery every way it's measured; the 230 wins only the smaller number on the receipt.
Output and noise are a wash: both hold the 40W draw and both are rated equally quiet, so nothing but tank size is doing the deciding. That makes the 230 a daytime top-up unit and the MAX an all-night one.
CPAP overnight needs 320Wh; RIVER 3 230 has 196Wh usable, 125Wh short (~61% covered)RIVER 3 MAX has 486Wh usable, covers the night with 166Wh to spareboth are rated as low as 30 dBA and both start and hold the ~40W CPAP load
Why it mattersAnyone shopping for a CPAP or any load that runs while they sleep should pass the 230 and buy the MAX; the gap is capacity, and no feature closes it.
weight
For those 2.6 lbs you give up 342Wh, more than half the MAX's battery. That's a fine trade for the person hiking it to a campsite and a poor one for the person setting it on a shelf and forgetting it's there.
RIVER 3 230: 7.8 lbs; RIVER 3 MAX: 10.4 lbscapacities 230Wh vs 572Wh
Why it mattersOnly buyers who carry the unit often, or far, should let weight tilt them to the 230; for car camping and home standby the difference is noise.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: The MAX holds 572Wh to the 230's 230Wh yet costs less per watt-hour ($0.56 vs $0.82) and less per lifetime kilowatt-hour ($0.19 vs $0.27) on the same cells, which is the single biggest reason to size up.
cost / lifetime kWh
Two things make this gap trustworthy rather than a spec-sheet mirage. Both units use the same cells with the same cycle rating, so the MAX's lower cost per stored watt-hour isn't borrowed from thinner chemistry or a shorter life; it's just the discount that comes with buying energy in a slightly bigger block. And it holds whether you measure at the register or across the pack's full life.
The 230 does own one honest counter-number. Because it's cheaper in absolute dollars under the identical 5-year warranty, it costs less per year of coverage, and the warranty note below will show you that spread. But that figure tracks the sticker, not the value: you pay less because you get less. Per watt-hour, which is the only thing a battery actually sells, the MAX is the cheaper of the two.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: Both are small units that miss the big jobs; the one overnight load that splits them is a CPAP, which the MAX finishes and the 230 comes up 125Wh short on.
Read the scenario row and the honest headline is that these are small units. Weekend camping, an 8-hour blackout, a remote workday, van life, even a tailgate: both come up short, most of them badly, because a 230Wh or 572Wh battery was never going to run a fridge or a heater for hours. The realistic jobs are the small ones, an afternoon off-grid and a single overnight device.
That overnight device is where they finally part. On a light afternoon-off-grid load both cruise, the 230 landing at 51% used and the MAX at 21%, so there the decision falls back to weight and price. Push to an overnight CPAP and only the MAX finishes; the 230 gives out before the alarm does. If any load on your list runs while you sleep, that single scenario is the tiebreak.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: The 230's whole case is 7.8 lbs against 10.4, the lightest and cheapest way into the RIVER 3 line.
weight
Both units are one-hand carries; the 230 just asks a little less of the hand. At 7.8 lbs it's 2.6 lighter than the MAX's 10.4, real if the unit lives in a pack that goes up trails, negligible if it lives in a trunk. What you trade for it is more than half the capacity, so the weight saving only pays off for people who feel every pound because they carry it.
There's a quieter perk for the smaller unit: its tank refills from the sun faster simply because there's less of it. The 230's 230Wh fills from the shared 110W solar input in roughly two hours of good sun, where the MAX's 572Wh needs about 5.2. Neither is fast enough to live on solar alone, but for a light off-grid day the 230 tops back up while you're still eating lunch.
Growth Path
Selected because: Only the MAX takes expansion batteries; the 230 is sealed at 230Wh, so it has to be sized right on day one.
Expandability is the MAX's alone. The 230 is sealed at 230Wh, so whatever you buy is the ceiling and you should size for your real needs on day one. The MAX takes EcoFlow's expansion batteries and can climb well past its base 572Wh.
Just don't read that as a home-backup path. Adding packs to a MAX extends how long it runs the same modest loads; it doesn't add the surge or the sockets to swing a house. Treat the MAX's expandability as optionality, room to stretch a campout or a workday, rather than a promise it can graduate into something it isn't.
Strengths & trade-offs
EcoFlow RIVER 3 230
Strengths
- +Costs $250 less
- +Lighter by 2.6 lb
Trade-offs
- –Sealed capacity — the RIVER 3 MAX can add batteries to grow past 230Wh; this one can't.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$250) than the RIVER 3 230.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on seven real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the RIVER 3 230 comes up 1,905Wh short (about 9% covered), the RIVER 3 MAX 1,614Wh (23%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither unit is a blackout box, and the gap to being one is wide. A modest 8-hour outage wants about 1,645Wh; the MAX covers roughly 30% of that and the 230 about 12%, so both leave you dark by evening. This isn't a knock on either, it's the wrong size of tool. If getting through a blackout is the goal, start with a station several times this big.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
RIVER 3 MAX
This is the one overnight job that separates them, and it isn't close. The MAX finishes the night with 166Wh still in reserve; the 230, with about 196 usable watt-hours against the 320 a CPAP night draws, taps out around 61% of the way to morning. Both are rated equally quiet at this low a load, so nothing but capacity is deciding it. If a CPAP is why you're shopping, buy the MAX.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 910Wh: the RIVER 3 230 comes up 715Wh short (about 22% covered), the RIVER 3 MAX 424Wh (53%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Neither unit
The RIVER 3 230 can start the 400W peak but not hold it — 600W of surge gets it going, then the 300W continuous rating takes over, so capacity never gets a say. This is the wrong size of unit for the job rather than a close call. The RIVER 3 MAX doesn't have the energy either — 486Wh usable against 670Wh, 184Wh short — so neither route works.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the RIVER 3 230 comes up 4,490Wh short (about 4% covered), the RIVER 3 MAX 4,199Wh (10%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
SCN-07 · an afternoon · needs 100Wh
Afternoon Off-Grid
Phones and a speaker at the park, beach, or campsite — the small-unit job description
Either unit
This is the job small stations are actually for, and both do it: the RIVER 3 230 finishes at 51% used, the RIVER 3 MAX at 21%. At this size the decider is what rides in the bag — 7.8 lbs for the RIVER 3 230 against 10.4 for the RIVER 3 MAX — and price, not the leftover watt-hours.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger (×2) 30W×2h · Bluetooth Speaker 10W×4h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: RIVER 3 MAX runs 2.4h vs 1h.
$439 list · direct from EcoFlow
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–32.4hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–6.5hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limits¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
August 30, 2026
Verdict: the RIVER 3 MAX, on Power Score margin
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX unless weight or the $189 sticker settles it for you. It carries 572Wh to the 230's 230Wh, and despite costing $250 more it works out cheaper per watt-hour ($0.56 against $0.82) and cheaper per lifetime kilowatt-hour ($0.19 against $0.27) on identical 3,000-cycle cells and the same 5-year warranty. That extra capacity is also the line between covering an overnight CPAP and quitting before morning. The 230 is the better grab-bag unit, 2.6 lbs lighter and cheaper on the receipt, and the right call if your loads never outgrow a phone and a laptop. For everyone else the MAX is simply more battery for less money per watt-hour, which is the only currency a battery trades in.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of August 30, 2026. The links below open EcoFlow's current price.
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the RIVER 3 230 price$189.00 list
Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated August 30, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 3 230 rates 4.3/5 (57th percentile of 22 Personal-class units), and RIVER 3 MAX rates 4.3/5 (58th percentile of 20 Compact-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
RIVER 3 MAX: Solar Recharge Takes 5.2h+
At its 110W rated solar ceiling, refilling the full 572Wh takes about 5.2 hours of sun — as a floor, since the rated figure assumes ideal panel angle and clear sky, and real days deliver less. Not practical as the primary charge source for daily off-grid use; treat solar as a top-up and plan on a wall outlet or generator.
Expandable, but into more hours, not more house
The 230 is sealed at 230Wh: what you buy is what you keep, so size it right the first time. The MAX takes expansion batteries, which sounds like the trump card and mostly isn't. At this class, extra packs buy longer runtimes on the same phones, laptops, and CPAP, not a jump to fridge-and-furnace home backup. Read the MAX's expandability as breathing room, not a different job.
10ms vs 20ms is a rating, not a stopwatch
Both list a UPS mode; the MAX is rated no worse than 10ms, the 230 no worse than 20ms. Read those as ceilings the manufacturer commits to, not measured switch times. Routers, modems, and most electronics ride through either. Where the spread earns attention is a desktop PC with unsaved work and a fussy power supply, the kind that can sit right at the 20ms line. If that's what you're protecting, the MAX's tighter rating is the safer bet.
Warranty: No Difference
Both units carry the same 5-year warranty, so coverage isn't a tiebreaker here. Worth saying because the per-dollar framing can suggest otherwise: the RIVER 3 230 works out at 26.5 years of cover per $1,000 spent against the RIVER 3 MAX's 11.4, but that spread is the price gap, not the terms.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the RIVER 3 MAX.
Check RIVER 3 MAX price →or check the RIVER 3 230 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The RIVER 3 230 is cheaper to buy, but the RIVER 3 MAX is cheaper to own. At $0.26/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.27/kWh, the RIVER 3 MAX's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years. One thing to know reading the table: both carry the same 3,000-cycle rating, so the lifetime rows are sticker price and capacity in disguise — the wear horizon is identical and decides nothing here.
Growth path
RIVER 3 230
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 230Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
RIVER 3 MAX
EXPANDABLESupports EcoFlow expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 572Wh.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are EcoFlow-specific. You're investing in the EcoFlow ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
The RIVER 3 230 is sealed at 230Wh, which is fine if that covers you. The RIVER 3 MAX starts at 572Wh and can grow beyond it with EcoFlow expansion batteries — though at this size expansion means longer runtimes on the same loads, not a path to home backup. More hours, not more house.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 230
Field notes on the RIVER 3 line run positive, with the caveat that they're about the line more than our specific variant. Reviewers single out sub-30dB, whisper-quiet operation as the headline improvement over the older RIVER 2A1, along with IP54 weather sealing, a faster UPS, a 2x runtime mode, and a more compact bodyA2. For camping, van life, or light home-UPS duty, the RIVER 3 gets recommended as the better buy for most in 2026A3.
One honesty flag we'll raise ourselves: our research covers the RIVER 3 family broadly, and the 230 is a specific smaller, lighter 230Wh variant, so treat variant-specific claims here as directional rather than measuredA0.
“The RIVER 3 operates under 30 dB — EcoFlow calls it 'whisper quiet,' quieter than a library — one of the most significant upgrades over the louder RIVER 2.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · ecoflow.com · rv.com
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
The MAX rides the same platform reviewers like, the sub-30dB, IP54-rugged RIVER 3 buildB2, while carrying the largest battery in the family, rated up to 858Wh with expansionB1, on 3,000-cycle LFP cells reviewers peg at roughly a decade of everyday useB3.
Reviewers also credit the RIVER 3 family with quality engineering and genuine portability for people who don't need to run a whole houseB4, though that particular note isn't pinned to this exact model, and model-specific field detail is thinner than on EcoFlow's longer-selling unitsB0.
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
Sources
powerstationadvisor.com · ecoflow.com · backuppowerhub.com · amazon.com · portablepowernerd.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- The RIVER 3 line's upgrades — sub-30 dB noise, IP54 waterproofing, faster UPS, more compact build — make it the recommended pick over the RIVER 2 for most uses. [RIVER 3 230 · 3 entries]
- Largest RIVER 3 capacity (up to 858Wh), quiet IP54 build, and 3,000-cycle LFP are the standout points. [RIVER 3 MAX · 3 entries]
- A1
“The RIVER 3 operates under 30 dB — EcoFlow calls it 'whisper quiet,' quieter than a library — one of the most significant upgrades over the louder RIVER 2.”
backuppowerhub.com / ecoflow.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Over the RIVER 2, the RIVER 3 adds IP54 waterproofing, a faster UPS switchover, a 2x runtime mode, quieter operation, and a more compact form factor.”
backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3 · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“Recommended as the better buy for most in 2026 — for camping, van life, or home UPS backup, where durability and noise matter, the data consistently favors the RIVER 3.”
backuppowerhub.com / rv.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
powerstationadvisor.com / ecoflow.com — RIVER 3 line review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Built on the same RIVER 3 platform reviewers praise for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggedness.”
backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 3,000+ cycles to 80% — roughly a decade of everyday use.”
backuppowerhub.com / amazon.com — RIVER 3 line · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Reviewers value the RIVER 3 family for quality engineering and genuine portability for those who don't need to power a whole house.”
portablepowernerd.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled August 30, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the RIVER 3 230 if you…
- →The buyer whose ceiling is $189 and whose loads genuinely top out at phones, laptops, cameras, and a few hours of lights, with no plan to grow.
- →The one who carries the unit, on a trail, on a bike, into a canoe, and will feel the 2.6 lbs the MAX adds every time.
- →The person who wants the smallest, quickest-to-refill RIVER 3 for daytime top-ups, and knows an overnight CPAP or a fridge was never on the list.
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX if you…
- →Anyone who wants an overnight unit: a CPAP, a run of medical or CPAP-adjacent gear, or just enough tank to not think about it, which the 230 can't cover.
- →The buyer who isn't sure how much capacity they need. Sizing up here costs $250 and lowers your price per watt-hour, so uncertainty points at the MAX.
- →The one who wants room to grow later with expansion batteries, or the tighter ≤10ms UPS rating for a desktop PC with unsaved work.
If neither fits
Skip both if you're shopping to ride out a real blackout, keep a fridge cold, or run tools on a jobsite. An 8-hour outage alone wants about 1,645Wh, and both of these come up short by four figures. That's not a knock on either unit, it's the wrong aisle: go straight to a station several times this size.
The Bottom Line
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX. It looks like the expensive one and it's the cheaper one where a battery is actually judged: more watt-hours, at a lower price each, on the same cells and the same warranty as the 230. That's the unusual upsell that costs more today and less over everything after.
Keep the 230 for exactly two people: the one whose budget stops at $189 and whose loads never outgrow a phone and a laptop, and the one weighing every ounce into a backpack. Everyone else should spend the extra $250 and, six months in, be quietly glad they didn't save it.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the RIVER 3 MAX worth the extra money over the 230?
For most buyers, yes. The MAX costs $250 more but holds 572Wh to the 230's 230Wh, works out cheaper per watt-hour ($0.56 vs $0.82), and is the only one of the two that covers an overnight CPAP. The 230 makes sense mainly if $189 is a hard ceiling or you specifically want the lightest unit in the line.
Can the RIVER 3 230 run a CPAP all night?
Not a full night. It has about 196 usable watt-hours against the roughly 320 a CPAP night draws, so it covers around 61% before going dark. The RIVER 3 MAX finishes the same night with 166Wh to spare, which is the main reason to size up if medical backup is on your list.
How much heavier is the RIVER 3 MAX?
About 2.6 pounds, 10.4 lbs against the 230's 7.8. Both are genuine one-hand carries, so the weight only matters if you're hauling it any real distance; for a shelf or a car trunk it's a rounding error against the MAX's much bigger battery.
Can either one power a fridge or get me through a blackout?
No, both are small by design. A single 8-hour outage needs roughly 1,645Wh and neither unit clears a third of that. If that's your use case, look at a station several times this capacity rather than choosing between these two.
Does the MAX's expandability make it a home-backup unit?
No. At this size, adding EcoFlow expansion batteries buys longer runtimes on the same small loads, phones, laptops, a CPAP, not the surge and sockets to run a house. Think of it as breathing room to extend a workday or a campout, not a path to whole-home backup.
Where to buy
EcoFlow RIVER 3 230
$189.00
$189.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 56 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAXPick
$499.00
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.