PSA
StationArena

Head-to-head test

EcoFlow RIVER 2 vs EcoFlow RIVER 3 230

Neither is sold by EcoFlow any more, and they were near-twins anyway: 26Wh more battery on the RIVER 2 against a 100W USB-C port and a tighter UPS class on the RIVER 3 230, so keep whichever you own and shop the successors, the RIVER 2 240 or the RIVER 3 PLUS.

Full profiles: EcoFlow RIVER 2 → · EcoFlow RIVER 3 230 →

Looking for a different matchup? EcoFlow RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3

Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated

Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk

Stack these against 100+ rivals
MethodologyReader-supported — we may earn from links (details)

Spec deltas

Capacity
256Wh
230Wh
Output
300W
matched
300W
Weight
7.8 lb
matched
7.8 lb
Typical price
No longer sold
No longer sold
Cost / Wh
—
—
Cycle life
3,000
matched
3,000
Solar input
110W
matched
110W
01

Both of these have left EcoFlow's store. What EcoFlow sells in the RIVER 2's place is the RIVER 2 240, the same unit with a slightly smaller battery. The RIVER 3 230 survives only as marketplace listings, and the smallest RIVER 3 EcoFlow still stocks is the RIVER 3 PLUS. Nothing on this page can be bought new from the maker, so the verdict is a tie and the useful question is which successor.

If you own one, or you've found stock, the comparison still holds, and it's closer than the generation gap suggests. Same 300W inverter with 600W surge, same 7.8 lbs, same 110W solar input, same 3,000-cycle rating, same socket count. Set them side by side on a desk and you're comparing fine print.

The fine print splits two ways. The RIVER 2 holds 256Wh to the RIVER 3 230's 230, about 11% more. The RIVER 3 230 answers with a 100W USB-C port against 60W, a UPS transfer rated ≤20ms against ≤30ms, and a published noise ceiling where the RIVER 2 publishes nothing. Neither edge is big enough to justify trading one for the other.

02

What the Numbers Reveal

Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.

F1

Capacity

The one scenario where that shows is the CPAP night, and it shows as when you run out, not whether: the RIVER 2 gets about 68% of the way through, the RIVER 3 230 about 61%, and neither sees morning. Extra battery that doesn't finish the job is a later alarm, not a different outcome.

both: 300W output, 600W surge, 7.8 lbs, 110W solar input, 3,000 cyclesRIVER 2 256Wh vs RIVER 3 230 230Whusable after the flat 85% derate: 218Wh vs 196WhCPAP Overnight needs 320Wh: RIVER 2 covers about 68%, RIVER 3 230 about 61%

Why it mattersAn owner of either unit has no capacity reason to trade for the other.

F2

Both of those are desk specs. A laptop that wants more than 60W charges slowly or barely holds steady on the RIVER 2's port, and a ≤30ms transfer is the class many desktop power supplies won't ride through, where ≤20ms is fine on paper for routers and most electronics. The RIVER 3 230's advantages all show up at a desk, not at a campsite.

USB-C: 60W on the RIVER 2 vs 100W on the RIVER 3 230UPS transfer ceiling: ≤30ms on the RIVER 2 vs ≤20ms on the RIVER 3 230identical socket counts: 2 AC, 1 car outlet, 2 USB-A, 1 USB-C

Why it mattersIf your RIVER 2 is guarding a computer or feeding a hungry laptop, that's where its age shows, and the fix is a current unit rather than a second-hand twin.

F3

The bedside is exactly where both units run dry before dawn. Quiet is a nice tiebreak for a nightstand phone charger and a moot one for a CPAP plan, because the right CPAP answer is a bigger battery, not a quieter small one.

RIVER 3 230 publishes 30 dB as a ceiling reached at high charge or discharge rates; the RIVER 2 publishes no figurea comparison review says the RIVER 2 runs noticeably louder under loadA1B1neither covers a full 320Wh CPAP night

Why it mattersCPAP users should skip both rather than pick the quieter one.

F4

So the choice this page used to settle no longer exists in EcoFlow's store. At this size, EcoFlow sells one thing, the RIVER 2 240. The RIVER 3 platform now starts a step larger, with the RIVER 3 PLUS.

RIVER 2 retired; successor RIVER 2 240, the same unit with a slightly smaller batteryRIVER 3 230 retired; successor RIVER 3 PLUS, the smallest RIVER 3 EcoFlow still sells and a size upthe RIVER 2's only hardware lead over the RIVER 3 230 is capacity, 256Wh vs 230Wh

Why it mattersWant this size new from EcoFlow: the RIVER 2 240. Want the newer platform and can carry more: the RIVER 3 PLUS.

The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.

What the Specs Don't Tell You

Selected because: The UPS class and the noise disclosure are where these two near-twins actually differ.

On a pair this alike, none of the cards is about weight or capacity; the differences hide in the ratings. The UPS class is the one with consequences: ≤20ms on the RIVER 3 230 and ≤30ms on the RIVER 2, both ceilings rather than measurements. Behind a router or modem, either does the job. Behind a desktop with unsaved work, the RIVER 2's class is the one that may reboot it. The difference the cards don't flag sits on the same desk: a 100W USB-C port on the RIVER 3 230 against 60W, which a bigger laptop actually feels.

Read the noise card carefully. EcoFlow publishes 30 dB for the RIVER 3 230 as a maximum, reached when it charges or discharges hard, so a light load runs below it; the RIVER 2 publishes nothing. The comparison coverage we have says the RIVER 2 runs louder under loadA1A3, which is a reviewer's account, not a meter reading. The warranty card is a wash at 5 years apiece.

Runtime: Will It Power Your Gear?

Selected because: The RIVER 2's extra 26Wh is its only hardware lead, and this is where it shows.

The RIVER 2's extra battery shrinks to 22Wh once the flat 85% derate applies: 218 usable against 196. On the 100Wh afternoon load the engine models, that's the difference between finishing with 118Wh in reserve and finishing with 96. Both are leftovers you'd struggle to notice.

Everything else that governs runtime is shared: the same 300W inverter, the same 110W solar ceiling, the same 3,000-cycle rating. Refilling either from empty at that 110W ceiling takes a bit over two hours of strong sun by the arithmetic alone, before real panel losses stretch it. Capacity is not a reason to swap one for the other.

Your Life, Your Pick

Selected because: Six of seven scenarios overrun both units, which settles what either one is for.

Six of seven scenarios come back neither, and most aren't close: a camping weekend wants 2,100Wh, roughly ten times what either delivers. The row worth reading is CPAP Overnight, where the RIVER 2 covers about 68% of the night and the RIVER 3 230 about 61%. Both run out before morning. The RIVER 2 just runs out later.

Afternoon Off-Grid is the job these were built for, and both pass: 46% used on the RIVER 2, 51% on the RIVER 3 230. Tailgate fails on a different spec entirely, a 400W peak that beats both 300W inverters before capacity gets a vote. Read the table as a size verdict on both units, not a contest between them.

Growth Path

Selected because: Neither expands and neither is sold new by EcoFlow, so growing means choosing a successor.

Neither expands, which was fine when these were sold as sealed grab-and-go boxes. Now there's no new unit to grow into on either side, so the growth question becomes which successor. The RIVER 2 240 is the RIVER 2 with a slightly smaller battery. The RIVER 3 PLUS is a size up and takes an extra battery.

That makes the obvious upgrade from a RIVER 2 a sideways step: its like-for-like replacement holds less, not more. If you've outgrown either of these, the path runs through the RIVER 3 PLUS or a larger station altogether.

Strengths & trade-offs

EcoFlow RIVER 2

Strengths

  • +Larger battery capacity

Trade-offs

  • –No major technical downsides compared to rival.

EcoFlow RIVER 3 230

Strengths

  • Solid all-rounder with standard specs.

Trade-offs

  • –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
03

Will It Power Your Gear?

Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.

Scenario verdicts

We ran the math on seven real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.

SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh

Weekend Camping

Two nights off-grid with essential comfort

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the RIVER 2 comes up 1,882Wh short (about 10% covered), the RIVER 3 230 1,905Wh (9%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Camping power station guide →

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h

SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh

8-Hour Blackout

Keep the essentials running through a night without power

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 1,645Wh: the RIVER 2 comes up 1,427Wh short (about 13% covered), the RIVER 3 230 1,450Wh (12%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Emergency blackout power guide →

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h

SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh

CPAP Overnight

Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case

Neither unit

Neither finishes the night. The RIVER 2 covers about 68% of it and the RIVER 3 230 about 61%, so the extra battery moves when the alarm goes off, not whether. Plan on a larger station for CPAP rather than choosing between these.

CPAP battery backup guide →

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  CPAP Machine 40W×8h

SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh

Remote Workday

Full work day off-grid without power anxiety

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 910Wh: the RIVER 2 comes up 692Wh short (about 24% covered), the RIVER 3 230 715Wh (22%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h

SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh

Tailgate Party

Game day power for the crew

Neither unit

Neither unit can hold the 400W peak this scenario needs — the RIVER 2 on its 300W continuous rating, the RIVER 3 230 on its 300W, so capacity never gets a say. This is the wrong size of unit for the job rather than a close call.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h

SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh

Van Life Daily

A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the RIVER 2 comes up 4,467Wh short (about 5% covered), the RIVER 3 230 4,490Wh (4%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h

SCN-07 · an afternoon · needs 100Wh

Afternoon Off-Grid

Phones and a speaker at the park, beach, or campsite — the small-unit job description

Either unit

Both handle it with room to spare: 46% used on the RIVER 2, 51% on the RIVER 3 230. They weigh the same, so the tiebreak is the port you plug into. A laptop that wants more than 60W charges faster from the RIVER 3 230's 100W USB-C.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Phone Charger (×2) 30W×2h · Bluetooth Speaker 10W×4h

The Load Test

RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD

None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.

Essentials

Comfort & Convenience

High-Draw Appliances

Test duration

8h

Continuous draw

205W

Projected runtime

RIVER 21.1h
dead in 1.1h — before your 8h window ends
RIVER 3 2301h
dead in 1h — before your 8h window ends

For this load: RIVER 2 runs 1.1h vs 1h.

Planning for more than this? Describe your whole setup and get it sized →

Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology

Runtime by appliance

Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹

Essentials

The basics you need runningscale 0–14.5h
ApplianceRIVER 2RIVER 3 230
CPAP Machine40W draw
RIVER 2: 5.4h0 full nights
RIVER 3 230: 4.9h0 full nights
Phone Charger15W draw
RIVER 2: 14.5h
RIVER 3 230: 13h
Router + Modem20W draw
RIVER 2: 10.9h
RIVER 3 230: 9.8h
Starlink75W draw
RIVER 2: 2.9h
RIVER 3 230: 2.6h
LED Lights (4 bulbs)40W draw
RIVER 2: 5.4h
RIVER 3 230: 4.9h
Laptop (Working)60W draw
RIVER 2: 3.6h
RIVER 3 230: 3.3h

Comfort & Convenience

Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–2.9h
ApplianceRIVER 2RIVER 3 230
Box Fan75W draw
RIVER 2: 2.9h
RIVER 3 230: 2.6h
LED TV (55")80W draw
RIVER 2: 2.7h
RIVER 3 230: 2.4h
Mini-Fridge150W draw
RIVER 2: 1.5h
RIVER 3 230: 1.3h
Electric Blanket200W draw
RIVER 2: 1.1h0 full nights
RIVER 3 230: 1h0 full nights

High-Draw Appliances

These reveal the real limits
ApplianceRIVER 2RIVER 3 230
Coffee Maker1000W draw
RIVER 2: — exceeds output
RIVER 3 230: — exceeds output
Microwave1200W draw
RIVER 2: — exceeds output
RIVER 3 230: — exceeds output
Space Heater1500W draw
RIVER 2: — exceeds output
RIVER 3 230: — exceeds output

¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.

Conclusion

October 11, 2026

Verdict: the RIVER 3 230

Both units have left EcoFlow's store, so there is no live unit here to recommend and the honest call is a tie. As hardware they barely separate: the same 300W inverter, 7.8 lbs, 110W solar input and 3,000-cycle rating, split only by the RIVER 2's extra 26Wh against the RIVER 3 230's 100W USB-C port and ≤20ms UPS class. If you own either, keep it; nothing on the other side is worth a swap. If you're buying new, EcoFlow's like-for-like small unit is the RIVER 2 240, and the RIVER 3 platform now starts a size up with the RIVER 3 PLUS.

■■■■■■□□□□6/10

Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.

Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated October 11, 2026

04

Measured Data

Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.

Benchmark scores

RIVER 2RIVER 3 230
Overall Power Score
1,499
1,581
CPAPSleep Therapy Reliability
1,888
2,448
TailgatingOutlets & Portability
1,722
1,747
Apartment BalconyCompact Solar Living
1,776
1,877
CampingLightweight & Versatile
1,696
1,788

Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): UPS.

Full specifications

RIVER 2
No longer sold
RIVER 3 230
No longer sold
Capacity (Wh)
256
230
Output (W)
300
300
Surge Peak
600W
600W
AC Outlets
2
2
240V Outlets
0
0
30A RV Outlets
0
0

ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →

Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →
How these numbers are produced

Numeric verification

Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.

Owner claims

Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.

Runtime model

Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.

Power Score

Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.

See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →

Class ranking (the star rating)

Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 2 rates 3.9/5 (38th percentile of 25 Personal-class units), and RIVER 3 230 rates 4.4/5 (63rd percentile of 25 Personal-class units).

How the class ranking is computed →

Test Notes & Caveats

Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.

[NOTE]

UPS Transfer: ≤20ms vs ≤30ms

Both list a UPS mode, and both figures are ceilings, not measurements. The RIVER 3 230's ≤20ms class is fine on paper for routers, modems and most electronics. The RIVER 2's ≤30ms class is one many desktop power supplies won't ride through, so if it's guarding a computer with unsaved work, plan for a possible reboot.

[NOTE]

Warranty: Same Five Years

Both carry a 5-year term on our record, so cover doesn't separate them. Neither is stocked by EcoFlow any more, so if you're buying leftover or marketplace stock, confirm the seller passes on the maker's warranty before you count on it.

[NOTE]

RIVER 2: No Published Noise Figure

EcoFlow publishes 30 dB for the RIVER 3 230 and nothing for the RIVER 2. Read that 30 dB the right way round: EcoFlow's RIVER figure is a ceiling, reached when the unit charges or discharges hard, so a light bedside load sits below it. The RIVER 2's blank isn't proof it's louder; it's a spec you can't hold it to.

05

Ownership Analysis

What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.

Lifetime value

RIVER 2RIVER 3 230

│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.

RIVER 2
RIVER 3 230
Purchase price
No longer sold
No longer sold
Lifetime energy delivered
768 kWh
690 kWh
Cost per lifetime kWh
—
—
Cost per warranty year
—
—
Battery lifespan
8.2yr daily · 28.8yr weekends · 57.7yr weekly
8.2yr daily · 28.8yr weekends · 57.7yr weekly

Analyst note

Neither is sold new any more, so there is no price left to work a cost per kWh from, and what either costs you now depends on the used market. The hardware comparison still holds: over its rated life the RIVER 2 delivers about 768 kWh and the RIVER 3 230 about 690 kWh. One thing to know reading the table: both carry the same 3,000-cycle rating, so the lifetime rows are sticker price and capacity in disguise — the wear horizon is identical and decides nothing here.

Growth path

RIVER 2

FIXED CAPACITY

Fixed at 256Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.

Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.

RIVER 3 230

FIXED CAPACITY

Fixed at 230Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.

Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.

RIVER 2RIVER 3 230

Analyst note

Neither of these is sold new any more, so there is no growth path to buy into on either side. If you already own one: the RIVER 2 is fixed at 256Wh and the RIVER 3 230 is fixed at 230Wh. As a purchase decision, expandability isn't the question here.

06

What Owners Report

Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.

EcoFlow RIVER 2

The research on the RIVER 2 is mostly comparative, drawn from review sites and EcoFlow's own materials rather than owner forumsA0. What it agrees on: the RIVER 2 shares the RIVER 3's core platform, with LiFePO4 cells, a 300W inverter and roughly 60-minute fast charging, and it earned its reputation as a proven budget unitA2.

The knock is refinement. Its spec sheet carries no noise rating, and one comparison review cites owner reports that it runs noticeably louder under load than the RIVER 3A1. The same site calls it a reasonable indoor buy that lacks the newer unit's waterproofing, faster UPS and quieter runningA3.

“Shares the same core platform as the RIVER 3 — 300W output, LiFePO4 chemistry, and roughly 60-minute fast charging — and remains a popular, proven budget small-format unit.”
— ecoflow.com / versus.com — RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3, 2026

Sources

backuppowerhub.com · ecoflow.com · versus.com

EcoFlow RIVER 3 230

Field data on this exact variant is thin: most coverage is of the RIVER 3 line broadly, so what follows is line-level and only directional for a 230Wh unitB0. The line's headline is quiet, under 30 dB by EcoFlow's figure, which reviewers single out as one of the biggest steps up from the RIVER 2B1.

Reviewers also credit the RIVER 3 with IP54 waterproofing, a faster UPS transfer and a 2x runtime mode the RIVER 2 lacksB2, and recommended it over the RIVER 2 for camping, van life and home UPS useB3. That verdict was written while both were on sale; today it compares two units EcoFlow no longer stocksB0.

“The RIVER 3 operates under 30 dB — EcoFlow calls it 'whisper quiet,' quieter than a library — one of the most significant upgrades over the louder RIVER 2.”
— backuppowerhub.com / ecoflow.com — RIVER 3 review, 2026

Sources

backuppowerhub.com · ecoflow.com · rv.com

Sources & Research Notes

Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.

Recurring owner themes

  • The RIVER 2 is the older, cheaper unit on the same core platform — reasonable for budget indoor use but louder and less refined than the RIVER 3. [RIVER 2 · 2 entries]
  • The RIVER 3 line's upgrades — sub-30 dB noise, IP54 waterproofing, faster UPS, more compact build — make it the recommended pick over the RIVER 2 for most uses. [RIVER 3 230 · 3 entries]
  • A1

    “The RIVER 2's spec data doesn't include a specific dB rating, and owner reports suggest it's noticeably louder under load than the newer RIVER 3.”

    backuppowerhub.com — EcoFlow RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3 · 2026 · [negative]

  • A2

    “Shares the same core platform as the RIVER 3 — 300W output, LiFePO4 chemistry, and roughly 60-minute fast charging — and remains a popular, proven budget small-format unit.”

    ecoflow.com / versus.com — RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3 · 2026 · [positive]

  • A3

    “For strictly indoor use where every dollar counts, the RIVER 2 is still a reasonable choice — but it lacks the RIVER 3's refinements like waterproofing, faster UPS, and quieter operation.”

    backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3 recommendation · 2026 · [mixed]

  • B1

    “The RIVER 3 operates under 30 dB — EcoFlow calls it 'whisper quiet,' quieter than a library — one of the most significant upgrades over the louder RIVER 2.”

    backuppowerhub.com / ecoflow.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]

  • B2

    “Over the RIVER 2, the RIVER 3 adds IP54 waterproofing, a faster UPS switchover, a 2x runtime mode, quieter operation, and a more compact form factor.”

    backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 2 vs RIVER 3 · 2026 · [positive]

  • B3

    “Recommended as the better buy for most in 2026 — for camping, van life, or home UPS backup, where durability and noise matter, the data consistently favors the RIVER 3.”

    backuppowerhub.com / rv.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]

Research compiled October 11, 2026.

07

Who Should Buy Which

Buy the RIVER 2 if you…

  • →You already own a RIVER 2 and use it for phones and laptops: keep it. The RIVER 3 230 holds less and matches it on output, weight and solar input, so there's nothing worth trading toward.
  • →You want the RIVER 2's exact layout new from EcoFlow: that's the RIVER 2 240, the same unit with a slightly smaller battery.

Buy the RIVER 3 230 if you…

  • →You own a RIVER 3 230 and charge a laptop that wants more than 60W, or guard a computer through outages: keep it. The 100W USB-C port and the ≤20ms UPS class are the two things here the RIVER 2 can't match.
  • →You want the RIVER 3 platform new from EcoFlow and can carry a bigger box: the RIVER 3 PLUS is the smallest RIVER 3 still sold.

If neither fits

If you're shopping for CPAP nights, blackouts or a campsite, close this tab. Even the RIVER 2 covers only about two-thirds of a CPAP night, and an 8-hour blackout wants 1,645Wh, more than seven times what it can deliver. Look at stations several sizes up. And if all you charge is phones, a power bank does that job without carrying an AC inverter around.

08

The Bottom Line

Call it a tie, because neither can be bought from EcoFlow any more. As spec sheets they're near-twins: same inverter, same weight, same sockets. The RIVER 2's extra battery buys a later shortfall on a CPAP night, and the RIVER 3 230's faster USB-C and tighter UPS class only matter at a desk.

If you own either, keep it; nothing on the other side earns a swap. If you're buying new, pick between successors: the RIVER 2 240 for this exact size, the RIVER 3 PLUS if you'll carry a bigger box for the newer platform.

09

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.

Are the EcoFlow RIVER 2 and RIVER 3 230 discontinued?

Yes. Both have left EcoFlow's own store. EcoFlow now sells the RIVER 2 240 in the RIVER 2's place, the same unit with a slightly smaller battery, and the smallest RIVER 3 it still stocks is the RIVER 3 PLUS. The RIVER 3 230 survives only as marketplace listings we don't track.

What's the difference between the RIVER 2 and the RIVER 3 230?

Less than the names suggest. Both put out 300W with a 600W surge, weigh 7.8 lbs, take 110W of solar and are rated for 3,000 cycles. The RIVER 2 holds 256Wh to the RIVER 3 230's 230Wh; the RIVER 3 230 has a 100W USB-C port to the RIVER 2's 60W, a ≤20ms UPS rating to ≤30ms, and a published noise figure the RIVER 2 lacks.

Can the RIVER 2 or RIVER 3 230 run a CPAP all night?

No. The CPAP night we model takes 320Wh, and after the flat 85% derate the RIVER 2 delivers about 218Wh and the RIVER 3 230 about 196Wh. That covers roughly 68% and 61% of the night. For full nights you need a much larger station.

Should I replace my RIVER 2 with a RIVER 3 230?

Not for capacity: you'd give up 26Wh and gain nothing in output, weight or solar input. The case for the swap is the 100W USB-C port and the tighter UPS rating. Since the RIVER 3 230 has also left EcoFlow's store, a swap now means the RIVER 3 PLUS, a bigger unit, rather than a like-for-like replacement.

Which is quieter, the RIVER 2 or the RIVER 3 230?

Probably the RIVER 3 230, though no meter on this page settles it. EcoFlow publishes 30 dB for it as a ceiling at high charge or discharge rates and publishes nothing for the RIVER 2. Comparison reviews say the RIVER 2 runs louder under load.

Where to buy

RIVER 2

EcoFlow RIVER 2

Left EcoFlow's store

RIVER 3 230

EcoFlow RIVER 3 230

Left EcoFlow's store

Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.