Head-to-head test
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX vs Goal Zero Yeti 700
10.4 lbs against 19.3 — the RIVER 3 Max weighs nearly half what the Yeti 700 does, costs $381 less, and still has a growth path the sealed Yeti will never have.
Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated
Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
.webp)
EcoFlow
RIVER 3 MAX
2,472Power Score · Appliance Class
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
Goal Zero
Yeti 700
1,982Power Score · Device Hub
$699.95 list · direct from Goal Zero
Spec deltas
The EcoFlow RIVER 3 Max weighs 10.4 lbs; the Goal Zero Yeti 700 weighs 19.3. That's an 8.9-lb gap between two units built for the same basic job, and the lighter one also costs $380.95 less — $319 against $699.95.
Capacity favors the Yeti, 677Wh against 572Wh, but only by 105Wh, and the RIVER 3 Max is the expandable one of the two — it accepts add-on batteries the sealed Yeti structurally can't. Where the Yeti actually pulls ahead is solar input: 200W against the RIVER 3 Max's 110W, which shows up directly in EcoFlow's own disclosed 7.4-hour solar recharge time.
Neither unit is sized for a real multi-day trip or a serious blackout — both fall well short of that kind of draw. Inside the ceiling both units actually serve, day trips, device charging, an overnight CPAP, the RIVER 3 Max does the job lighter and cheaper, with a real path to more capacity later that the Yeti doesn't have.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
weight
Bring in price: the lighter unit also costs $380.95 less. This isn't a stripped-down-for-portability trade-off; the RIVER 3 Max is both the lighter and the cheaper unit at once.
RIVER 3 Max weighs 10.4 lbsYeti 700 weighs 19.3 lbs
Why it mattersA buyer assuming the heavier, pricier unit must be the more serious pick should check that assumption here — the lighter, cheaper EcoFlow also carries the higher composite score.
Even before any expansion battery gets added, the RIVER 3 Max's base capacity is only 105Wh behind the Yeti's 677Wh — a gap an expansion pack erases immediately and then reverses.
RIVER 3 Max is expandableYeti 700 is a closed system with no expansion path
Why it mattersBuyers unsure whether their power needs will grow get a real hedge with the RIVER 3 Max that the Yeti structurally can't provide.
solar input
That gap shows up directly in EcoFlow's own disclosed number: a 7.4-hour solar recharge time for the RIVER 3 Max, close to a full day of sun to top off from empty. That's the genuine cost of the smaller panel input.
Yeti 700 accepts a 200W solar panelRIVER 3 Max accepts a 110W solar panel
Why it mattersAnyone planning multiple days off-grid with no wall power, relying entirely on solar to refill, should weigh this against everything else favoring the RIVER 3 Max — it's the one spec that could flip the decision back toward the Yeti.
cost / lifetime kWh
Its 3,000-cycle rating against the Yeti's 4,000 doesn't erase that gap — the RIVER 3 Max's much lower price does more work than the Yeti's longer cycle count can claw back.
RIVER 3 Max's lifetime cost is $0.19 per kWhYeti 700's lifetime cost is $0.26 per kWh
Why it mattersA buyer optimizing total cost of ownership, not just today's sticker price, should default to the RIVER 3 Max even accounting for its shorter rated cycle life.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: The RIVER 3 Max wins on cost per kWh despite starting from less capacity — worth explaining plainly.
cost / lifetime kWh
Over a full service life, the Yeti delivers 2,708 kWh against the RIVER 3 Max's 1,716 — more total energy across its longer cycle count, but at $140 per warranty-year against the RIVER 3 Max's $64, a $76 gap that dwarfs anything the extra capacity buys back.
The RIVER 3 Max's cheaper rate holds up across the whole ownership period, not just at the checkout screen — $0.19 per kWh against $0.26. There's no point in owning either unit where the Yeti's premium turns into the better deal.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: An 8.9-lb gap is the single most felt difference between these two units.
weight
8.9 lbs is a real, felt difference — the RIVER 3 Max at 10.4 lbs is grab-and-go with one hand for nearly anyone; the Yeti at 19.3 lbs starts to ask for a deliberate lift. Weighed against each other, the RIVER 3 Max comes in at roughly half the Yeti's weight.
For anyone carrying this in and out of a car, a tent, or up a flight of stairs regularly, that gap compounds over a season in a way the spec sheet alone doesn't capture.
Growth Path
Selected because: The RIVER 3 Max's expansion option against the Yeti's sealed design is a real structural difference.
solar input
The RIVER 3 Max accepts EcoFlow's expansion batteries; the Yeti 700 is sealed at 677Wh for the life of ownership, full stop. That's a genuine structural advantage for the RIVER 3 Max, not a marketing checkbox — it's the difference between buying more capacity later and buying an entirely new unit.
It's also an advantage you don't have to use immediately. The RIVER 3 Max is the better buy today on price and weight alone; the expansion path is a bonus on top, not the reason to choose it.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: CPAP Overnight is the one scenario both units clear, and it narrowly favors the Yeti.
CPAP Overnight is the one scenario where both units genuinely work, and it's close: the Yeti uses 56% of its tank, the RIVER 3 Max 66%. Both finish the night with capacity to spare, but the Yeti has a bit more room if the night runs long.
Everything larger defeats both units badly. Weekend Camping needs roughly 2,100Wh — neither unit gets remotely close on its own. That's exactly the scenario where the RIVER 3 Max's expansion path matters most; the Yeti has no equivalent answer.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Solar recharge speed is the RIVER 3 Max's one honest weakness, and it's worth surfacing next to everything in its favor.
rated cycles
The honest weakness in the RIVER 3 Max's case is solar: its 110W panel input against the Yeti's 200W means a disclosed 7.4-hour recharge from empty, roughly twice as long as the Yeti needs to refill from the same sun. For anyone genuinely off-grid and depending on solar, that's worth weighing seriously.
Everything else in this section favors the RIVER 3 Max or ties. Both carry an identical 5-year warranty. The Yeti's 4,000-cycle rating beats the RIVER 3 Max's 3,000, a real but modest edge. And the Yeti's spec sheet lists no noise rating at all, while EcoFlow states 30dB — one more place the cheaper unit is the more transparent one.
Strengths & trade-offs
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Strengths
- +Costs $381 less
- +Lighter by 8.9 lb
Trade-offs
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 3,000 charge cycles vs the Yeti 700's 4,000, so it wears out sooner.
Goal Zero Yeti 700
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 4,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$381) than the RIVER 3 MAX.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 2,100Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 1,645Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Yeti 700
Both units handle a CPAP overnight with capacity to spare — the Yeti finishes using 56% of its tank, the RIVER 3 Max 66%. It's close enough to call a near-tie on power; if you're also weighing weight and price, the RIVER 3 Max's advantages there still hold for this scenario.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 910Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 670Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Yeti 700 runs 2.8h vs 2.4h.
$699.95 list · direct from Goal Zero
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–38.4hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–7.7hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limits¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the RIVER 3 MAX
Take the RIVER 3 Max. It weighs 8.9 lbs less than the Yeti 700, costs $380.95 less, and its lifetime cost comes in at $0.19 per kWh against the Yeti's $0.26 despite starting 105Wh smaller. It's also expandable, a real growth path the sealed Yeti can't match at any price. The Yeti's honest counter-case is real: it accepts a 200W solar panel against the RIVER 3 Max's 110W, meaning it refills roughly twice as fast from the same sun — the RIVER 3 Max's own disclosed solar recharge time is 7.4 hours. For anyone leaning on solar off-grid for days at a time, that's the one spec worth pausing on. Everyone else should take the lighter, cheaper unit.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open EcoFlow's and Goal Zero's current prices.
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
or check the Yeti 700 price$699.95 list
Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): Solar Generator.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 3 MAX rates 4.7/5 (83rd percentile of 19 Compact-class units), and Yeti 700 rates 3.6/5 (17th percentile of 19 Compact-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
The RIVER 3 Max Takes 7.4 Hours on Solar
Its 110W panel input against the Yeti 700's 200W means roughly twice the wait to refill from empty using the sun alone. Everything else favors the RIVER 3 Max in this matchup — this is the one honest exception, and it matters most for multi-day off-grid trips.
The Yeti 700 Can't Grow Past 677Wh
It's a sealed system for the life of ownership. The RIVER 3 Max's expansion path is the real structural advantage on its side of this comparison — a way to add capacity later instead of buying a second unit.
Surge Power: Inverter Quality Indicator
The RIVER 3 MAX has a 2× surge-to-continuous ratio vs the Yeti 700's 1.7×. A higher ratio (≥2×) means the inverter handles motor startup surges better. That's critical for fridges, AC compressors, and power tools that briefly draw 2-3× their rated wattage. The Yeti 700 may trip when starting these appliances even though its continuous wattage looks sufficient.
Identical 5-Year Warranty on Both
Coverage length isn't a differentiator here — both units carry the same 5-year term regardless of price or capacity.
The Yeti 700 Is Rated for 1,000 More Cycles
4,000 against the RIVER 3 Max's 3,000 — a real, modest edge for daily use. It doesn't overcome the RIVER 3 Max's much lower price in the lifetime-cost math, but it's a genuine point in the Yeti's column.
No Published Noise Rating for the Yeti 700
EcoFlow states 30dB for the RIVER 3 Max. Goal Zero's spec sheet for the Yeti 700 lists nothing. One more place where the cheaper, lighter unit is also the more transparent one.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the RIVER 3 MAX.
Check RIVER 3 MAX price →or check the Yeti 700 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The RIVER 3 MAX wins on both sticker price and long-term value. At $0.19/kWh over its lifetime, it's meaningfully cheaper to own. Clear value winner.
Brand trust
EcoFlow
Ecosystem
Largest in portable power — 12-15 models across DELTA Pro, DELTA 3, and RIVER 3 series, plus solar panels and smart home panels
Support
US-based phone/email/chat support (1-800-368-8604). Experiences are polarized — many report hassle-free prepaid-label replacements, but others report long waits and refurbished units sent for new claims. Pro tip: buying from Costco or Amazon gives you a stronger return safety net.
Community
Largest community in the space — Reddit r/Ecoflow_community (~31K members), multiple Facebook groups, and an official community forum
App experience
Rated 4.6/5 iOS (~8,400 ratings) · 4.2/5 Android (~17,000 ratings)
Unique strength
Fastest-charging technology (X-Stream), deepest product ecosystem, and most active innovation cadence. Supports up to 180kWh modular expansion with DELTA Pro Ultra X.
Worth knowing
The Oct 2025 DELTA Max 2000 recall (overheating/fire risk, 6 incidents) is worth noting. Also tested subscription paywalls for advanced app features in early 2025 before community backlash paused the plan. No parts or service offered out of warranty.
Goal Zero
Ecosystem
Focused — 5-6 active portable power station models across Yeti and Yeti Pro series, plus Alta coolers, Nomad/Ranger solar panels, and vehicle integration kits
Support
US-based company (Salt Lake City, owned by NRG Energy). Historically considered premium support, but 2025-2026 reports describe long wait times, unresponsive email communication, and tickets going unaddressed for weeks. The "premium support justifies premium pricing" argument is weakening.
Community
Small but loyal — strong following in overlanding and preparedness communities. Official community forums were recently shuttered, frustrating long-time users.
App experience
Rated 4.4/5 iOS (~1,200 ratings) but recent reviews skew negative — recurring connectivity issues, crashes, and stability problems.
Unique strength
Pioneer of the portable power market — strongest brand heritage. US-based company with ruggedized, weather-resistant designs (IPX4). Integrated "Yeti-Ready" ecosystem with coolers, lights, and vehicle kits.
Worth knowing
Widely acknowledged as the most expensive brand (lowest Wh per dollar). Support quality has declined from its "premium" standard. Perceived as competitively stagnant vs. faster-innovating Chinese competitors. Reliability reports on newer models are concerning.
Analyst note
EcoFlow and Goal Zero are close competitors. Both have established support channels and growing ecosystems. Compare their specific warranty terms and community size for your peace of mind.
Growth path
RIVER 3 MAX
EXPANDABLESupports EcoFlow expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 572Wh.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are EcoFlow-specific. You're investing in the EcoFlow ecosystem.
Yeti 700
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 677Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Don't read the RIVER 3 MAX's expandability as a straight win here: it starts at 572Wh, below the Yeti 700's 677Wh, so a first expansion battery largely buys back capacity the Yeti 700 already includes. It only pulls ahead if you'd grow past 677Wh — short of that, the Yeti 700's larger fixed capacity is the simpler value.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
The RIVER 3 Max sits at the top of EcoFlow's RIVER 3 line, and reviewers consistently call the platform out for sub-30dB, whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggednessA2. Its LiFePO4 cells are rated past 3,000 cycles to 80%, which reviewers translate into roughly a decade of everyday useA3.
The recurring praise across coverage is quality engineering paired with genuine portability — reviewers position it for people who need real power without needing to run a whole house off itA4. That's a fair description of where this unit actually wins in this comparison: the everyday, carry-it-around case, not the disaster-prep one.
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
Sources
powerstationadvisor.com · ecoflow.com · backuppowerhub.com · amazon.com · portablepowernerd.com
Goal Zero Yeti 700
Reviewer coverage on the Yeti 700 is upfront about what kind of unit this is — lightweight and simple, ideal for a quick camping trip or topping off devices, rather than the most powerful or capable option in its classB3. Against a unit that's both lighter and cheaper, that read holds up throughout this matchup.
Where the Yeti does earn real praise is ruggedness: an IPX4 water-resistance rating and tolerance for temperature extremes, described as genuinely built for outdoor abuseB2. That's paired with a 6th-generation LiFePO4 pack rated past 4,000 cycles, good for more than a decade of daily use by the same accountB1.
“A 6th-generation 677Wh compact power station on upgraded LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 4,000+ cycles — daily use for over 10 years.”
Sources
goalzero.com · amazon.com · campingsolar.us · outdoorgearlab.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Largest RIVER 3 capacity (up to 858Wh), quiet IP54 build, and 3,000-cycle LFP are the standout points. [RIVER 3 MAX · 3 entries]
- Modern LFP (4,000+ cycles), IPX4 ruggedness, and light, simple portability are the highlights; modest power and capacity. [Yeti 700 · 3 entries]
- A2
“Built on the same RIVER 3 platform reviewers praise for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggedness.”
backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 3,000+ cycles to 80% — roughly a decade of everyday use.”
backuppowerhub.com / amazon.com — RIVER 3 line · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Reviewers value the RIVER 3 family for quality engineering and genuine portability for those who don't need to power a whole house.”
portablepowernerd.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“A 6th-generation 677Wh compact power station on upgraded LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 4,000+ cycles — daily use for over 10 years.”
goalzero.com / amazon.com — Yeti 700 · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Carries an IPX4 water-resistance rating and can handle extreme temperatures — a rugged, outdoor-ready design.”
goalzero.com / campingsolar.us — Yeti 700 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Ideal for quick camping trips and device charging — not the most powerful or capable, but lightweight and simple, appealing to portability-focused users.”
outdoorgearlab.com — Yeti 700 review · 2026 · [mixed]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX if you…
- →You want the lighter, cheaper unit for everyday carry and don't need a multi-day off-grid solar setup.
- →You want a real path to more capacity later without replacing the whole unit.
Buy the Yeti 700 if you…
- →You're relying on solar to recharge off-grid for multiple days and want the faster 200W panel input over the RIVER 3 Max's 110W.
- →You want the extra 105Wh of capacity built in now and don't need an expansion path later.
If neither fits
If your real need is a weekend camping trip (roughly 2,100Wh) or an 8-hour blackout (roughly 1,645Wh), neither unit gets remotely close on its own — both fall short by several times their usable capacity. The RIVER 3 Max's expansion path is the honest answer here; a single unexpanded unit of either kind isn't.
The Bottom Line
The RIVER 3 Max weighs nearly half what the Yeti 700 does, costs $380.95 less, and still comes out cheaper per lifetime kWh despite a smaller base battery — and it's the one of the two that can actually grow past its starting capacity.
Take the RIVER 3 Max unless multi-day off-grid solar charging is a real part of your plan, in which case the Yeti's faster 200W panel input is the one spec worth paying for. For everyone else, the lighter and cheaper unit is also the better long-term buy.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
What's the real difference between the RIVER 3 Max and the Yeti 700?
Mostly weight and price. The RIVER 3 Max weighs 10.4 lbs and costs $319; the Yeti 700 weighs 19.3 lbs and costs $699.95. The Yeti holds 105Wh more capacity and accepts a faster 200W solar panel against the RIVER 3 Max's 110W. The RIVER 3 Max is expandable; the Yeti is a sealed, closed system.
Is the Yeti 700's extra capacity worth $381?
Not on the numbers alone — the gap is only 105Wh, and the RIVER 3 Max's lifetime cost per kWh ($0.19) still beats the Yeti's ($0.26) despite that smaller base. The Yeti's real case is its faster solar input and closed-system reliability, not raw capacity.
How long does the RIVER 3 Max take to recharge from solar?
About 7.4 hours from empty, based on its 110W panel input. The Yeti 700's 200W input covers the same job roughly twice as fast. For anyone depending entirely on solar over a multi-day trip, that gap is worth factoring in.
Does either of these support battery expansion?
Only the RIVER 3 Max. It accepts EcoFlow's add-on batteries and can grow past its 572Wh base. The Yeti 700 is a sealed unit for the life of ownership — if you outgrow 677Wh, the only option is a new unit.
Which one should I actually buy?
The RIVER 3 Max, for most buyers — lighter, cheaper, expandable, and still cheaper per lifetime kWh despite less starting capacity. Take the Yeti 700 only if you're genuinely relying on solar off-grid for multiple days and need its faster 200W panel input.
Where to buy
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAXPick
$319.00
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
Goal Zero Yeti 700
$699.95
$699.95 list · direct from Goal Zero
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.