Head-to-head test
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX vs BLUETTI AC50B
For about $40 more than the AC50B, the RIVER 3 Max out-capacities it, out-values it per watt-hour, and out-expands it - its one real concession is a solar input so small its 572Wh battery takes nearly a full day to refill from the sun alone.
Full profiles: EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX → · BLUETTI AC50B →
Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated
Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
.webp)
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
$399.00 · direct from BLUETTI
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Spec deltas
$40 separates the RIVER 3 Max ($439) from the AC50B ($399), and that $40 buys 124 more watt-hours - 572Wh against 448Wh - at a lower cost per watt-hour to boot.
That's the unusual part of this matchup: BLUETTI's AC50B is normally the value pick against EcoFlow, but here the RIVER 3 Max undercuts it on cost per Wh ($0.56 vs $0.67) and cost per lifetime kWh ($0.19 vs $0.22) at the same time.
The AC50B keeps two real advantages - it's 4.4 lbs lighter, and its 200W solar input refills far faster than the RIVER 3 Max's 110W. Everywhere else, the bigger, newer unit is ahead for barely more money.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
Capacity
That advantage holds over the full ownership window too: $0.19 per lifetime kWh against the AC50B's $0.22. Unlike the AC50B's other matchups, it has no price edge to fall back on here at all.
RIVER 3 Max: $439 for 572Wh ($0.56/Wh)AC50B: $399 for 448Wh ($0.67/Wh)
Why it mattersWhatever reason there is to pick the AC50B in this pairing, it isn't cost - that argument belongs to the RIVER 3 Max.
solar input
Filling that bigger 572Wh battery from the sun alone takes about 7.4 hours, most of a good solar day, while the AC50B's smaller battery paired with its larger 200W input refills meaningfully faster.
RIVER 3 Max: 110W solar input, 572Wh capacityAC50B: 200W solar input, 448Wh capacity
Why it mattersFor pure off-grid solar reliance with no wall outlet for days, the AC50B's faster refill can matter more than its smaller capacity; for anyone charging mainly from an outlet or a car, the gap is irrelevant.
That reserve is the buffer for the next night if there's no time for a full recharge in between - a string of cloudy days, or back-to-back trips.
RIVER 3 Max uses about 66% of capacity on a CPAP overnight loadAC50B uses about 84% of capacity on the same load
Why it mattersFor repeated nightly CPAP use without a guaranteed daily full recharge, the RIVER 3 Max's extra headroom is worth more than the solar tradeoff costs it.
The AC50B's case here has narrowed to two things: it's the lighter unit, and it refills faster from the sun. Everything else favors the newer, bigger unit for barely more money.
RIVER 3 Max: expandable, 2.0x surge ratio, 10ms switchoverAC50B: closed system, 1.4x surge ratio, 20ms switchover
Why it mattersUnless portability or solar-charging speed is the deciding factor, the RIVER 3 Max is the more future-proof buy.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: the rare case where the AC50B loses the value argument outright
cost / lifetime kWh
Nineteen cents a kilowatt-hour against twenty-two - the RIVER 3 Max is cheaper to own here despite costing $40 more upfront, because $0.56 per watt-hour beats the AC50B's $0.67 at checkout and that gap compounds across the battery's life. Both carry an identical 5-year warranty, so that isn't where this gets decided.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: CPAP Overnight shows a real headroom gap even though both units technically pass
CPAP Overnight is where the capacity gap actually shows up, even though both units pass. The RIVER 3 Max uses about 66% of its capacity for the night; the AC50B uses about 84%. Every other scenario here - weekend camping, a full blackout, van life - is out of reach for both regardless, so this is the one load worth weighing.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: solar recharge time is RIVER 3 Max's one real concession, worth surfacing plainly
The one place the RIVER 3 Max gives something back is solar: its 110W input is barely half the AC50B's 200W, so its bigger 572Wh battery takes about 7.4 hours to refill from the sun alone. Everywhere else it's ahead - a 2.0x surge ratio against 1.4x, a 10ms switchover against 20ms, and a real expansion path against none.
Growth Path
Selected because: RIVER 3 Max has both the bigger base and the expansion path
solar input
For once there's no size-versus-flexibility trade to make: the RIVER 3 Max already carries the bigger base (572Wh vs 448Wh) and adds a real expansion path on top. The AC50B has neither the bigger battery nor anywhere to grow - it simply loses this column outright.
Brand Trust
Selected because: cross-brand pair where EcoFlow beats BLUETTI's own value positioning
This is the rare matchup where an EcoFlow unit beats BLUETTI's own value positioning - the RIVER 3 Max costs less per watt-hour and per lifetime kWh than the AC50B, and it comes with EcoFlow's larger expansion ecosystem on top. BLUETTI's reputation for the best capacity-to-price ratio in the category doesn't hold up against this specific EcoFlow model.
Strengths & trade-offs
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Strengths
- +Lighter by 4.4 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
BLUETTI AC50B
Strengths
- +Costs $40 less
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Sealed capacity — the RIVER 3 MAX can add batteries to grow past 448Wh; this one can't.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the RIVER 3 MAX comes up 1,614Wh short (about 23% covered), the AC50B 1,719Wh (18%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 1,645Wh: the RIVER 3 MAX comes up 1,159Wh short (about 30% covered), the AC50B 1,264Wh (23%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
RIVER 3 MAX
Both units get through the night, but the RIVER 3 Max finishes with roughly a third of its capacity still in reserve against the AC50B's one-sixth. That reserve is the buffer for a string of cloudy days or back-to-back nights without a full recharge.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 910Wh: the RIVER 3 MAX comes up 424Wh short (about 53% covered), the AC50B 529Wh (42%). Treat this as partial cover — enough for the essentials in it, not the whole list.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 670Wh: the RIVER 3 MAX comes up 184Wh short (about 72% covered), the AC50B 289Wh (57%). Either gets you most of the way, so this is a scenario you plan around rather than one you should rule them out for.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the RIVER 3 MAX comes up 4,199Wh short (about 10% covered), the AC50B 4,304Wh (8%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: RIVER 3 MAX runs 2.4h vs 1.9h.
$439 list · direct from EcoFlow
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–32.4hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–6.5hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limits¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Take the RIVER 3 Max. It costs $0.56 per watt-hour against the AC50B's $0.67, and $0.19 per lifetime kWh against $0.22 - it's simply the better deal, not just the bigger battery. It also expands and switches over faster. Its honest weakness: EcoFlow cut its solar input to 110W, nearly half the AC50B's 200W, so refilling that bigger battery from the sun alone takes about 7.4 hours. If you charge from a wall outlet or a car, that never matters. If you're relying on sun alone for days at a stretch, it does.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open EcoFlow's and BLUETTI's current prices.
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the AC50B price$399.00 list
Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): Solar Generator, Tailgating.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 3 MAX rates 4.3/5 (58th percentile of 20 Compact-class units), and AC50B rates 4.6/5 (76th percentile of 22 Personal-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
AC50B: 45dB Published
45dB is about as loud as a running refrigerator. The RIVER 3 MAX is rated 30dB, and the two are not the same kind of figure: the RIVER 3 MAX's is a MAXIMUM under heavy charge and discharge, while the AC50B's is its maker's best case — so the gap between them may be larger or smaller than it looks, not simply smaller. For most people, fan noise around 45dB and up is where sleep starts to suffer.
The Family's Biggest Battery, Smallest Solar Intake
The RIVER 3 Max cuts solar input to 110W - nearly half of what the AC50B accepts - so filling its bigger 572Wh battery from the sun alone takes about 7.4 hours, nearly a full day. If you're charging from a wall outlet or a car, this doesn't matter. If you're relying on sun alone for days at a time, it does.
No Trade-Off This Time
The RIVER 3 Max scales past 572Wh with an add-on battery; the AC50B is fixed at 448Wh forever. Combined with its lower cost per lifetime kWh, expansion is one more column where the AC50B simply doesn't compete in this matchup.
AC50B: Power Lifting to 1,000W
The AC50B has BLUETTI's Power Lifting mode, which runs a resistive appliance rated up to 1,000W from its 700W inverter. It does that by delivering less power than the appliance asks for, not more than the inverter has: the heater still works, it just heats more slowly. Two things follow. BLUETTI scopes the mode to purely resistive loads — a heater, a kettle, an incandescent lamp — so it does nothing for a fridge compressor, a pump or a power tool, and this record publishes no surge figure at all, so read the mode as a resistive-load feature rather than as starting ability. And it is not a reason to size down, because running a load that big from 448Wh is a short session either way. Genuinely useful if a heater or a kettle is why you're buying; beside the point otherwise. The RIVER 3 MAX publishes no equivalent.
UPS Switchover: ≤10ms vs ≤20ms
Both list a UPS mode, at different rated speeds. The RIVER 3 MAX is rated ≤10ms — quick enough on paper that desktop PCs and routers should ride through, treating that as the rating it is. The AC50B is rated ≤20ms — fine on paper for routers and most electronics; the fussiest PC power supplies sit right at this line. If a computer with unsaved work is the thing being protected, the stated class is worth the attention; nothing here is a lab result.
Warranty: No Difference
Both units carry the same 5-year warranty, so coverage isn't a tiebreaker here. The AC50B's figure is a maximum rather than a guarantee — it depends on buying direct from BLUETTI or registering the unit, since reseller purchases carry a shorter term.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the RIVER 3 MAX.
Check RIVER 3 MAX price →or check the AC50B priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The AC50B is cheaper to buy, but the RIVER 3 MAX is cheaper to own. At $0.26/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.3/kWh, the RIVER 3 MAX's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years. One thing to know reading the table: both carry the same 3,000-cycle rating, so the lifetime rows are sticker price and capacity in disguise — the wear horizon is identical and decides nothing here.
Brand trust
EcoFlow
Ecosystem
Largest in portable power — 12-15 models across DELTA Pro, DELTA 3, and RIVER 3 series, plus solar panels and smart home panels
Support
US-based phone/email/chat support (1-800-368-8604). Experiences are polarized — many report hassle-free prepaid-label replacements, but others report long waits and refurbished units sent for new claims. Pro tip: buying from Costco or Amazon gives you a stronger return safety net.
Community
Largest community in the space — Reddit r/Ecoflow_community (~31K members), multiple Facebook groups, and an official community forum
App experience
Rated 4.6/5 iOS (~8,400 ratings) · 4.2/5 Android (~17,000 ratings)
Unique strength
The deepest expansion ecosystem in the category and the fastest charging technology (X-Stream) across the RIVER 3 to DELTA Pro lineup.
Worth knowing
The October 2025 DELTA Max 2000 recall over overheating risk and an abandoned early-2025 attempt at app-feature paywalls are both worth knowing, even though neither touches the RIVER 3 line directly.
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship portable (Apex 300, 2764.8Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
Best capacity-to-price ratio in the category overall - though in this specific matchup, the RIVER 3 Max actually undercuts it on cost per watt-hour.
Worth knowing
Support is the inconsistent part of the deal, heavily email-based with delays; buying direct from BLUETTI's own site tends to produce smoother outcomes than third-party retailers.
Analyst note
This is the rare pairing where an EcoFlow unit beats BLUETTI's own value pricing outright - the RIVER 3 Max costs less per watt-hour and per lifetime kWh than the AC50B, with EcoFlow's larger ecosystem and expansion path on top. BLUETTI's usual value edge doesn't hold up against this specific model.
Growth path
RIVER 3 MAX
EXPANDABLESupports EcoFlow expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 572Wh.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are EcoFlow-specific. You're investing in the EcoFlow ecosystem.
AC50B
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 448Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
The AC50B is sealed at 448Wh, which is fine if that covers you. The RIVER 3 MAX starts at 572Wh and can grow beyond it with EcoFlow expansion batteries — though at this size expansion means longer runtimes on the same loads, not a path to home backup. More hours, not more house.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Reviewers consistently describe the RIVER 3 Max as the largest-capacity model in EcoFlow's RIVER 3 line, built on the same platform praised for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggednessA1A2. Its LiFePO4 cells are rated for 3,000+ cycles to 80% capacity - roughly a decade of everyday useA3. The RIVER 3 family generally draws praise for quality engineering and genuine portability for buyers who don't need to power a whole houseA4.
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
Sources
powerstationadvisor.com · ecoflow.com · backuppowerhub.com · amazon.com · portablepowernerd.com
BLUETTI AC50B
At 14.8 lbs, the AC50B is meaningfully lighter than BLUETTI's own AC70 (21.4 lbs) - reviewers call it genuinely portable, sub-15-lb territoryB2. It pairs that with a 700W inverter (1,000W under Power Lifting) and a 2,500+ cycle LiFePO4 rating owners describe as good for years of regular useB1. Standard AC charging takes about 3 hours, dropping to 1.25 hours with the optional 480W Turbo chargerB3.
“A 448Wh LiFePO4 battery with 700W output (1,000W Power Lifting), rated for 2,500+ cycles to 80% — years of reliable use.”
Sources
amazon.com · backuppowerhub.com · the-gadgeteer.com · t3.com · bluettipower.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Largest RIVER 3 capacity (up to 858Wh), quiet IP54 build, and 3,000-cycle LFP are the standout points. [RIVER 3 MAX · 3 entries]
- Affordable, genuinely portable LFP unit with 700W output, 2,500+ cycles, fast Turbo charging, and B80 expandability. [AC50B · 3 entries]
- A1
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
powerstationadvisor.com / ecoflow.com — RIVER 3 line review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Built on the same RIVER 3 platform reviewers praise for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggedness.”
backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 3,000+ cycles to 80% — roughly a decade of everyday use.”
backuppowerhub.com / amazon.com — RIVER 3 line · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Reviewers value the RIVER 3 family for quality engineering and genuine portability for those who don't need to power a whole house.”
portablepowernerd.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“A 448Wh LiFePO4 battery with 700W output (1,000W Power Lifting), rated for 2,500+ cycles to 80% — years of reliable use.”
amazon.com / backuppowerhub.com — AC50B review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“At 14.8 lbs it's meaningfully lighter than the AC70 (21.4 lbs) — a genuinely portable sub-15-lb unit with a long-cycle battery and 700W output at an easy-to-justify price.”
backuppowerhub.com / the-gadgeteer.com — AC50B review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Standard AC charging is about 3 hours, dropping to 1.25 hours with the optional 480W Turbo charger; 0-80% in 45 minutes.”
amazon.com / t3.com — AC50B review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX if you…
- →Someone who wants the bigger battery, a real expansion path, and faster switchover for about the same money, and who charges mainly from a wall outlet or a car rather than the sun alone.
Buy the AC50B if you…
- →Someone charging primarily off-grid from solar who wants a faster refill on a smaller battery, or anyone who wants the lightest, cheapest-at-checkout unit and doesn't need to grow the system.
If neither fits
Anyone trying to power a full weekend campsite or ride out a multi-day blackout - both units fall far short of that load (Weekend Camping needs roughly 2,100Wh); a larger station is the right category instead.
The Bottom Line
Take the RIVER 3 Max. For about $40 more than the AC50B, it delivers more capacity, a lower cost per watt-hour and per lifetime kWh, a real expansion path, and a faster switchover. The AC50B only pulls ahead on weight and solar recharge speed, and neither is enough to close the rest of the gap.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the RIVER 3 Max or the AC50B the better value?
The RIVER 3 Max, on both counts - it costs $0.56 per watt-hour against the AC50B's $0.67, and $0.19 per lifetime kWh against $0.22, despite a sticker price only $40 higher.
Which charges faster from solar?
The AC50B. Its 200W solar input is nearly double the RIVER 3 Max's 110W, so despite carrying less capacity to fill, it refills faster off the sun alone - the RIVER 3 Max takes about 7.4 hours to recharge its bigger 572Wh battery from solar.
Can the RIVER 3 Max be expanded later?
Yes - it supports EcoFlow add-on batteries past its 572Wh base. The AC50B is a closed system with no expansion option at all.
Which one is lighter?
The RIVER 3 Max, at 10.4 lbs against the AC50B's 14.8 lbs - about 4.4 lbs less to carry.
Can either run a CPAP through the night?
Yes, both clear a roughly 320Wh overnight CPAP load, but the RIVER 3 Max finishes with more in reserve - it uses about 66% of its capacity against the AC50B's 84%.
Brand matchup
EcoFlow vs BLUETTI: measured across every matchup →Where to buy
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAXPick
$499.00
$499.00 · direct from EcoFlow
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
BLUETTI AC50B
$399.00
$399.00 · direct from BLUETTI
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.