Head-to-head test
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX vs BLUETTI Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
572Wh for $319 against 403Wh for $599 — the RIVER 3 MAX has more capacity, half the weight, and a quieter fan than the Pioneer; the Pioneer only pulls ahead on solar ceiling and warranty length.
Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated
Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
.webp)
EcoFlow
RIVER 3 MAX
2,472Power Score · Appliance Class
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
BLUETTI
Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
1,626Power Score · Device Hub
$599.00 list · direct from BLUETTI
Spec deltas
The RIVER 3 MAX costs $319 and holds 572Wh. The Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 costs $599 and holds 403Wh. That's more capacity for less money, and it isn't a rounding error — it's a $280 gap running in the wrong direction for the more expensive unit.
It's also lighter: 10.4 lbs against 20.06, close to half. Usually more capacity costs more weight; here the cheaper, bigger-tank unit is also the one you can carry with one hand.
The Pioneer doesn't lose everywhere. Its 200W solar ceiling nearly doubles the RIVER 3 MAX's 110W, and its IP65 rating is a documented step up from the RIVER 3 platform's IP54. Neither closes a $280 gap on its own, but both are real reasons a specific buyer might still pick it.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
Capacity
Amortized over each unit's full life it's still not close: $0.19 per lifetime kWh for the RIVER 3 MAX against $0.50 for the Pioneer. There's no scenario where paying more for the Pioneer buys more capacity; it's simultaneously smaller and pricier.
RIVER 3 MAX costs $319 for 572Wh at $0.56/WhPioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 costs $599 for 403Wh at $1.49/Wh
Why it mattersBuyers weighing these on 'get what you pay for' logic should know that logic doesn't apply here — the RIVER 3 MAX wins both axes at once.
That extra weight on the Pioneer isn't buying runtime. It's buying an IP65 rating against the RIVER 3 platform's IP54B1A2 — real ruggedness, but a different purchase than 'more power station.'
RIVER 3 MAX weighs 10.4 lbs and holds 572WhPioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 weighs 20.06 lbs and holds 403Wh
Why it mattersBuyers who need genuine weather or job-site durability are paying for something the capacity number doesn't show; buyers who don't are just carrying more weight for less power.
solar input
Recharge speed is a survival spec during a real outage, not a convenience one — 7.4 hours of strong sun to refill from empty is the whole day, while the Pioneer's smaller tank and bigger panel ceiling fill faster.
RIVER 3 MAX solar input is 110W against a 572Wh tankPioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 solar input is 200W against a 403Wh tanka full solar recharge on the RIVER 3 MAX takes about 7.4 hours
Why it mattersBuyers planning genuine off-grid solar recharging, not just topping off from a wall outlet, should weigh the Pioneer's faster refill against its smaller capacity.
Add in the noise gap — 30dB on the RIVER 3 MAX against 45dB on the Pioneer — and the cheaper unit is both the one with spare capacity for a bad night and the quieter box to sleep next to.
CPAP Overnight needs 320WhRIVER 3 MAX uses 66% of its capacity to cover itPioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 uses 93% of its capacity to cover it
Why it mattersCPAP buyers should default to the RIVER 3 MAX unless a specific reason (ruggedness, faster solar) points the other way.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: A $280 price gap running the opposite direction from capacity is the headline number.
cost / lifetime kWh
Nineteen cents against fifty. That gap holds whether you look at the sticker price, the per-Wh cost ($0.56 vs $1.49), or the cost spread across every cycle either unit is rated for.
Per warranty-year it's $64 against $100 — the Pioneer's extra year of coverage (six against five) doesn't come close to erasing an $18 gap per year of ownership, let alone the $280 up front.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: Half the weight for more capacity is the physical proof behind the price gap.
weight
10.4 lbs is a one-hand grab off the passenger seat. 20.06 lbs is a two-hand lift, and it's carrying 169Wh less for the privilege.
That extra weight isn't wasted — it corresponds to a real, documented IP65 rating against the RIVER 3 platform's IP54B1A2. If the unit is living somewhere it'll actually get rained on or dusted, that's a fair trade. If it's living in a closet between trips, it's just extra mass.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: CPAP Overnight is where the capacity and noise gap both show up in one job.
CPAP Overnight is the one scenario with a clear winner: the RIVER 3 MAX covers a 320Wh night using two-thirds of its tank, the Pioneer using nearly all of its. Every other modeled scenario — Weekend Camping, an 8-Hour Blackout, a Remote Workday, a Tailgate Party, Van Life Daily — outruns both units by a wide enough margin that the gap between them barely matters next to how outmatched they both are.
That's the honest scope of this pair: light-duty and overnight jobs, not multi-day off-grid living. Within that scope, the RIVER 3 MAX's extra capacity and quieter fan make it the easier one to sleep next to.
Growth Path
Selected because: Both expand, but the Pioneer's solar ceiling gives it the real growth edge — an honest catch worth surfacing.
solar input
Both units accept add-on batteries, so neither locks you into today's capacity — that part is a wash. Where they actually diverge is solar: the Pioneer's 200W ceiling against the RIVER 3 MAX's 110W means a bigger future panel setup fills it faster.
That's the one structural edge working against our own pick here: if the plan is genuinely growing an off-grid solar setup rather than just adding batteries, the Pioneer's higher solar ceiling is worth the trade even though it starts smaller and costs more.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Solar recharge time, noise, switchover speed, and warranty are the concrete tiebreakers.
A full solar recharge on the RIVER 3 MAX takes about 7.4 hours from empty — most of a good sun day, a direct result of pairing a bigger tank with the smaller 110W panel ceiling. The Pioneer's smaller tank and bigger panel close that gap.
Everything else favors the RIVER 3 MAX: quieter under load (30dB against 45dB) and a faster switchover (under 10ms against under 20ms). The Pioneer's one clean win outside solar is warranty length — six years against five.
Strengths & trade-offs
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Strengths
- +Costs $280 less
- +Lighter by 9.7 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
BLUETTI Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
Strengths
- +Longer warranty
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$280) than the RIVER 3 MAX.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit is close to sized for a full weekend — both fall well short of the load. The RIVER 3 MAX's larger tank still leaves it further from the finish line than the gap in price would suggest; treat this pair as an overnight or day-trip tool, not a multi-day one.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 1,645Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
RIVER 3 MAX
The RIVER 3 MAX wins clearly: it covers a CPAP night using about two-thirds of its tank, the Pioneer nearly all of its, and it's the quieter box to sleep beside.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 910Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 670Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: RIVER 3 MAX runs 2.4h vs 1.7h.
$319 list · direct from EcoFlow
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–32.4hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–6.5hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limits¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the RIVER 3 MAX
Take the RIVER 3 MAX. At $319 it holds 169Wh more than the $599 Pioneer, weighs about half as much (10.4 lbs vs 20.06), runs 15dB quieter, and costs $0.19 per lifetime kWh against the Pioneer's $0.50. The Pioneer's real edges — a 200W solar ceiling against 110W, one extra warranty year, and a tested IP65 rating against the RIVER 3 platform's IP54 — matter only if fast off-grid solar recharging or real weather exposure specifically decides it for you.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open EcoFlow's and BLUETTI's current prices.
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
or check the Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 price$599.00 list
Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): Solar Generator.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 3 MAX rates 4.7/5 (83rd percentile of 19 Compact-class units), and Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 rates 3.9/5 (38th percentile of 22 Personal-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60: 45dB Under Load
45dB under load against the RIVER 3 MAX's sub-30dB. The RIVER 3 MAX is the one you can sleep next to without noticing.
RIVER 3 MAX: Solar Recharge Takes 7.4h
A bigger 572Wh tank paired with a smaller 110W panel ceiling means a full solar refill eats most of a daylight window. The Pioneer's smaller tank and bigger 200W ceiling fill faster.
UPS Speed: line-interactive (<10ms) vs standby (<20ms)
The RIVER 3 MAX switches over in under 10ms; the Pioneer in under 20ms. Both are fast enough for most electronics, but the RIVER 3 MAX's margin is the better one for anything sensitive to a power blink.
Warranty Value Comparison
Six years on the Pioneer against five on the RIVER 3 MAX, but priced per year of coverage it's $100 against $64 — the extra year doesn't offset the higher sticker price.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the RIVER 3 MAX.
Check RIVER 3 MAX price →or check the Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The RIVER 3 MAX wins on both sticker price and long-term value. At $0.19/kWh over its lifetime, it's meaningfully cheaper to own. Clear value winner.
Delivers each lifetime kWh for $0.31 less — check the RIVER 3 MAX price →
Brand trust
EcoFlow
Ecosystem
Largest in portable power — 12-15 models across DELTA Pro, DELTA 3, and RIVER 3 series, plus solar panels and smart home panels
Support
US-based phone/email/chat support (1-800-368-8604). Experiences are polarized — many report hassle-free prepaid-label replacements, but others report long waits and refurbished units sent for new claims. Pro tip: buying from Costco or Amazon gives you a stronger return safety net.
Community
Largest community in the space — Reddit r/Ecoflow_community (~31K members), multiple Facebook groups, and an official community forum
App experience
Rated 4.6/5 iOS (~8,400 ratings) · 4.2/5 Android (~17,000 ratings)
Unique strength
Fastest-charging technology (X-Stream), deepest product ecosystem, and most active innovation cadence. Supports up to 180kWh modular expansion with DELTA Pro Ultra X.
Worth knowing
The Oct 2025 DELTA Max 2000 recall (overheating/fire risk, 6 incidents) is worth noting. Also tested subscription paywalls for advanced app features in early 2025 before community backlash paused the plan. No parts or service offered out of warranty.
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship (Apex 300, 3072Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
Among the best capacity-to-price ratios available — several Elite and Apex units are the lowest $/Wh in the catalog. Widest product diversity including industry-firsts like sodium-ion cold-weather units and dual solar+alternator vehicle hubs. Full LFP standardization across lineup (3,500-6,000+ cycles). Dual-voltage (120V/240V) in flagships.
Worth knowing
Customer support inconsistency is the #1 risk factor. Older/discontinued units may become unrepairable — no spare parts policy for some models. Some reports of erratic communication from support agents.
Analyst note
EcoFlow's support network, community, and app ratings are all larger or higher-rated than BLUETTI's on paper. None of that changes what's actually in the box: at $319 with 572Wh, the RIVER 3 MAX undercuts the Pioneer on price and capacity alike, and brand size doesn't buy back a $280 gap.
Growth path
RIVER 3 MAX
EXPANDABLESupports EcoFlow expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 572Wh.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are EcoFlow-specific. You're investing in the EcoFlow ecosystem.
Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 403Wh.
Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, but the Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60's higher solar ceiling (200W vs 110W) gives it the stronger off-grid growth path — more panels can feed a bigger bank as it grows.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAX
Coverage of the RIVER 3 MAX leans on the shared RIVER 3 platform more than on this specific 572Wh configuration, but the throughline is consistent: reviewers praise the family for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggednessA2, with genuine portability for anyone who doesn't need to power a whole houseA4.
The 3,000-cycle LiFePO4 chemistry is described as good for roughly a decade of everyday useA3, matching the spec sheet. Model-specific field data for this exact capacity point is thinner than platform-level commentary — treat the quiet, rugged reputation as inherited from the RIVER 3 line rather than independently verified at 572Wh specifically.
“Offers up to 858Wh of LFP battery storage — the largest capacity in the RIVER 3 line — as a compact, portable unit.”
Sources
powerstationadvisor.com · ecoflow.com · backuppowerhub.com · amazon.com · portablepowernerd.com
BLUETTI Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
The Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60's IP65 water- and dust-resistance is a genuine step up on paper from the RIVER 3 platform's IP54B1A2 — protected against low-pressure water jets, not just dust, though still not fully waterproof. Reviewers describe it as the 'Goldilocks' of BLUETTI's lineup: enough durability and capacity for the price without paying flagship moneyB4.
It also expands to a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteriesB3 and turbo-charges to full in about an hourB2 — both capabilities the RIVER 3 MAX shares, so neither is an exclusive Pioneer advantage. Field coverage of this exact 403Wh configuration remains thinner than for the higher-capacity AC60P.
“Same IP65 water- and dust-resistant rating (protected from dust and low-pressure water jets, but not fully waterproof) and LiFePO4 chemistry as the AC60P.”
Sources
bluettipower.com · thriftyclik.com · joshwp.com · trustedreviews.com · gearjunkie.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Largest RIVER 3 capacity (up to 858Wh), quiet IP54 build, and 3,000-cycle LFP are the standout points. [RIVER 3 MAX · 3 entries]
- Same IP65 ruggedness, Turbo charging, and expandability as the AC60P at a lower price and smaller base capacity. [Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 · 3 entries]
- A2
“Built on the same RIVER 3 platform reviewers praise for sub-30dB whisper-quiet operation and IP54 ruggedness.”
backuppowerhub.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“LiFePO4 chemistry rated for 3,000+ cycles to 80% — roughly a decade of everyday use.”
backuppowerhub.com / amazon.com — RIVER 3 line · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Reviewers value the RIVER 3 family for quality engineering and genuine portability for those who don't need to power a whole house.”
portablepowernerd.com — RIVER 3 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“Same IP65 water- and dust-resistant rating (protected from dust and low-pressure water jets, but not fully waterproof) and LiFePO4 chemistry as the AC60P.”
bluettipower.com / thriftyclik.com — AC60 review · 2026 · [mixed]
- B2
“Turbocharging to a full charge in about one hour.”
bluettipower.com / joshwp.com — AC60 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Expandable from its 403Wh base to a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteries.”
bluettipower.com / trustedreviews.com — AC60 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“The standard 403Wh AC60 at a lower price; owners praise its IP65 durability and compact design, calling it the 'Goldilocks' of portable charging.”
gearjunkie.com / bluettipower.com — Pioneer 50 (AC60) review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the RIVER 3 MAX if you…
- →Buyers who want the most capacity per dollar and per pound — 572Wh at 10.4 lbs beats the Pioneer on both counts.
- →CPAP sleepers who want spare capacity and a quieter box: it covers an overnight run using two-thirds of its tank against the Pioneer's near-full drain.
Buy the Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 if you…
- →Buyers who need real weather or dust exposure handled — the IP65 ratingB1 is a documented step up from the RIVER 3 platform's IP54A2.
- →Buyers building a genuine off-grid solar setup where the 200W panel ceiling against 110W means a materially faster refill.
- →Anyone who values the extra warranty year (six against five) enough to pay for it directly.
If neither fits
Anyone planning a full weekend campout or an 8-hour blackout should skip both — those loads run into the thousands of watt-hours, well beyond what either unit's tank covers. Look at a 1,000Wh-plus station instead.
The Bottom Line
Take the RIVER 3 MAX. It holds 169Wh more than the Pioneer for $280 less, weighs about half as much, and runs 15dB quieter — $0.19 per lifetime kWh against $0.50.
The Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 earns its price in two narrow lanes: a 200W solar ceiling for buyers actually building an off-grid panel setup, and a documented IP65 rating for anyone who needs real weather durability. Outside those two cases, the cheaper unit is also the bigger, lighter, quieter one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60 worth $280 more than the RIVER 3 MAX?
Not on capacity or price — the RIVER 3 MAX has 169Wh more for $280 less. The Pioneer only pulls ahead on its 200W solar ceiling, one extra warranty year, and a documented IP65 rating against the RIVER 3 platform's IP54.
Which one is better for a CPAP machine?
The RIVER 3 MAX. It covers an 8-hour, roughly 320Wh CPAP night using about two-thirds of its capacity, while the Pioneer uses nearly all of its. The RIVER 3 MAX also runs 15dB quieter under load.
Which one is more durable in bad weather?
The Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60, on paper. It carries a documented IP65 rating — protected against dust and low-pressure water jets, though not fully waterproof — against the RIVER 3 platform's IP54. That durability is part of why it weighs almost twice as much.
Can I add solar panels and batteries to either one later?
Both accept expansion batteries, so neither locks you into today's capacity. The real difference is solar input: the Pioneer's 200W ceiling nearly doubles the RIVER 3 MAX's 110W, so it fills faster from a bigger future panel setup.
Why is the cheaper unit also the bigger one?
The RIVER 3 MAX simply packs more capacity per dollar and per pound than the Pioneer does — $0.56 per Wh against $1.49. The Pioneer's price is going toward its IP65 rating, higher solar ceiling, and an extra warranty year, not toward raw capacity.
Where to buy
EcoFlow RIVER 3 MAXPick
$319.00
$319.00 list · direct from EcoFlow
BLUETTI Pioneer 50 BLUETTI AC60
$599.00
$599.00 list · direct from BLUETTI
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.