Head-to-head test
BLUETTI AC240P vs DJI Power 2000
The AC240P protects against weather from the outside in (IP65); the Power 2000 protects against failure from the inside out (26 sensors, 21 fuses) — and DJI does it for $640 less, 23.5 lbs lighter, and near-silent.
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
BLUETTI
AC240P
3,528Power Score · Appliance Class
$1,461.99 list · direct from BLUETTI
DJI
Power 2000
4,208Power Score · Appliance Class
$1,299.00 list · direct from DJI
Spec deltas
The Power 2000 costs $1,299 to the AC240P's $1,939 — $640 less — while holding more capacity, 2,048Wh against 1,843Wh, and running quieter doing it: 30dB against 45dB. Both are 2026-era units aimed at serious off-grid and backup use, but they get there by different routes.
The AC240P's protection is external: IP65-sealed, tested by reviewers through a 6-hour rainstorm and constant saltwater spray with the interior staying dry — but only when every port cover is closed. The Power 2000's protection is internal: an eightfold system of flame-retardant materials, 26 temperature sensors, and 21 fuses, with no IP rating claimed at all.
Which one matters depends on where this unit lives. Exposed to real weather, the AC240P's tested shell is the safer bet. Under any roof — garage, van, home — the Power 2000's lower price, lighter weight, and faster charging make it the easier recommendation.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
rated cycles
At $640 less and 500 more lifetime cycles, the Power 2000's cost per lifetime kWh works out to roughly half the AC240P's — $0.16 against $0.30 — while holding slightly more capacity to begin with.
AC240P $1,939 vs Power 2000 $1,299AC240P $0.30 cost per lifetime kWh vs Power 2000 $0.16Power 2000 4,000 cycles vs AC240P 3,500 cycles
Why it mattersOn pure ownership economics, the AC240P has to win elsewhere, because it's losing this argument by a wide margin.
The AC240P's rainstorm-and-saltwater test proves it can sit outside exposedA2, but that protection lapses the moment a cable is plugged in during rainA1. The Power 2000 skips the weatherproofing question entirely and instead hardens against what happens inside the box — a structural approach reviewers call one of the safest builds on the marketB3.
AC240P IP65-rated, held up through a rainstorm and saltwater spray with no water intrusionA2Power 2000 has no IP rating; instead built with 26 temperature sensors, 21 fuses, and flame-retardant materialsB3AC240P's IP65 seal only holds with all port covers closedA1
Why it mattersIf this unit will actually see rain or spray, only the AC240P is rated for it; if it's living under cover, the Power 2000's internal safety case is just as strong an argument, for less money.
weight
45dB against 30dB is a real difference in a shared space, and independent measurement backs it up: reviewers found the Power 2000 stayed among the quietest units they tested even under the heaviest loadsB2. Combined with being 23.5 lbs lighter than the AC240P — nearly a third less to carry — it's the easier unit to live with day to day.
AC240P 45dB noise under load vs Power 2000 30dBPower 2000 reviewers measured it among the quietest units tested, even under heavy loadsB2AC240P weighs 72 lbs vs Power 2000's 48.5 lbs
Why it mattersFor anyone moving this in and out of a vehicle or running it near where they sleep, the Power 2000's weight and noise advantage compounds every single use.
solar input
1,800W of solar input against the AC240P's 1,200W means the Power 2000 pulls in 600W more at once — reviewers clocked a full solar recharge in around 75 minutesB1, fast enough to top off between uses rather than planning around an entire sunny day.
AC240P solar input 1,200W vs Power 2000 solar input 1,800WPower 2000 charges from solar to full in about 75 minutes at that rateB1AC240P capacity 1,843Wh vs Power 2000 2,048Wh
Why it mattersIn a multi-day outage, the Power 2000's faster refill matters more than its 205Wh larger capacity — you're back to full sooner, repeatedly.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: $0.16 vs $0.30 per lifetime kWh is a clear, wide gap.
cost / lifetime kWh
The Power 2000 wins the ownership math clearly: $1,299 against the AC240P's $1,939 is $640 saved on day one, and with 500 more lifetime cycles (4,000 vs 3,500), its cost per lifetime kWh comes out to $0.16 against the AC240P's $0.30 — nearly half.
Warranty-adjusted, the AC240P runs $323 a year of coverage to the Power 2000's $260, even with a year of extra term. There's no value metric here where the AC240P comes out ahead; its case has to be made on build philosophy, not price.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Weight and noise both favor the Power 2000 by a wide margin.
rated cycles
Weight and noise are the two gotchas that separate these clearly. The Power 2000 at 48.5 lbs is 23.5 lbs lighter than the AC240P's 72 — close to a third less to lift — and it runs at 30dB against the AC240P's 45dB under load.
The AC240P's counter isn't a gotcha the engine flags, because it's a design philosophy rather than a spec gap: a full-unit IP65 rating field-tested in rain and saltwaterA2, against the Power 2000's internal-hardening approach with no IP claim at all. Neither is objectively better — they're solving different problems.
Growth Path
Selected because: Both expand; the Power 2000's higher solar ceiling gives it the edge here too.
solar input
Both units expand with batteries from their respective brands, so growth room isn't exclusive to either. Where they diverge is solar: the Power 2000 accepts up to 1,800W against the AC240P's 1,200W, a 600W ceiling advantage that pays off every time you're relying on the sun to refill.
For an off-grid setup that's likely to add panels over time, that higher solar ceiling means the Power 2000's growth path costs less to build out — you don't hit an input bottleneck as early as you would on the AC240P.
Brand Trust
Selected because: Established BLUETTI ecosystem against a new but well-resourced DJI entrant.
BLUETTI is the established name here — 15-20+ models, an active Reddit community, and an app rated 4.5 out of 5, tied for best in the category. DJI is new to power stations (2024) with just four models and no dedicated owner community yet, but it's leveraging the same global support and repair network built for its drone business.
DJI's advantage isn't track record — it's engineering pedigree. 700+ battery patents from drone R&D and industrial build quality show up directly in the Power 2000's charging speed and safety systemB3B4. BLUETTI's advantage is maturity: a bigger community, a more polished app, and years of real-world data on this exact platform. Newer isn't automatically riskier here, but it is less proven.
Strengths & trade-offs
BLUETTI AC240P
Strengths
- +Longer warranty
Trade-offs
- –Significantly heavier (+23.5 lbs), making it harder to move.
- –Weaker inverter (-600W) limits appliance compatibility.
DJI Power 2000
Strengths
- +Costs $163 less
- +Lighter by 23.5 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 2,100Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Power 2000
The AC240P runs out of juice. It only has 1,567Wh usable, but this scenario needs 1,645Wh. The Power 2000 covers it and still has 6h of phone charging left over.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
Both are wildly overqualified for CPAP. You're using 20% or less. Save your money and buy whichever is cheaper; the extra capacity is completely wasted on a 40W overnight load. Put the savings toward a second battery for multi-night trips.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Either unit
Both power your workstation all day without breaking a sweat. At these utilization levels, prioritize the unit with better USB-C output for direct laptop charging. It's more convenient than using the AC inverter and wastes less energy.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Either unit
Both handle game day easily. Since capacity isn't the deciding factor, consider weight: the lighter unit is easier to load into a truck bed. Also check if either has Bluetooth speaker-level noise. Fan sound matters in social settings.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Power 2000 runs 8.5h vs 7.6h.
$1,299 list · direct from DJI
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–116.1hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–23.2hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–1.7h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the Power 2000
The Power 2000 is the stronger buy for most people: $640 cheaper, more capacity (2,048Wh vs 1,843Wh), quieter by 15dB, faster to charge, and $0.16 per lifetime kWh against the AC240P's $0.30. The AC240P's real advantage is its field-tested IP65 shell — proven through a rainstorm and saltwater spray — which the Power 2000 doesn't match; DJI instead builds in an eightfold internal protection system rather than external weatherproofing. If you need this unit exposed to actual rain or salt spray, that tips toward the AC240P. If it's living under any kind of cover, the Power 2000 wins on nearly every other number.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open BLUETTI's and DJI's current prices.
$1,299.00 list · direct from DJI
or check the AC240P price$1,461.99 list
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): CPAP, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, AC240P rates 4.2/5 (52nd percentile of 24 Everyday-class units), and Power 2000 rates 4.1/5 (50th percentile of 25 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
AC240P: 72 lbs Is a Commitment
At 72 lbs, this is manageable but not fun to carry. That's heavier than a large checked suitcase. Moving it from your car to a campsite requires some effort and flat terrain.
AC240P: 45dB Under Load
45dB is about as loud as a running refrigerator. If you're running a CPAP or sleeping near this unit, the fan noise may be noticeable. Most people find anything above 45dB disruptive for sleep.
UPS Speed: line-interactive (<10ms) vs standby (<20ms)
The Power 2000 switches to battery in 10ms (line-interactive (<10ms)), while the AC240P takes 15ms (standby (<20ms)). Safe for desktop PCs, routers, and CPAP machines. NAS drives are protected. This matters if you're using it as a home UPS for always-on equipment.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Power 2000.
Check Power 2000 price →or check the AC240P priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The Power 2000 wins on both sticker price and long-term value. At $0.16/kWh over its lifetime, it's meaningfully cheaper to own. Clear value winner.
Brand trust
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship (Apex 300, 3072Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
The most mature ecosystem here — 15-20+ models, an active Reddit community, and a top-rated app after a recent redesign.
Worth knowing
Support quality is inconsistent and can involve China-timezone delays; buying direct from BLUETTI's own site tends to produce smoother outcomes.
DJI
Ecosystem
New entrant (2024) — 4 power station models: Power 500, Power 1000 V2, Power 1000 Mini, Power 2000
Support
Leveraging DJI's established global support and repair center network from the drone business. Generally positive reputation inherited from drone operations, but limited power-station-specific track record.
Community
No dedicated power station community yet. Discussions happen within r/dji (~250K members, mostly drone users). Very small power-specific presence on Facebook and forums.
App experience
Rated 3.5/5 iOS and Android (DJI Home app ratings reflect entire DJI ecosystem including drones/cameras, not power-station-specific). Users report the on-device screen is more reliable than the app.
Unique strength
Battery and safety engineering carried over from 700+ drone patents, showing up directly in charging speed and the Power 2000's fused, sensor-heavy build.
Worth knowing
DJI is genuinely new to power stations, with no dedicated owner community yet and only about two years of track record in the category.
Analyst note
BLUETTI has the deeper power-station history and the more active community; DJI brings engineering pedigree from a much larger, well-funded parent company. Neither support experience is a known weak point the way it can be for other brands in this space — DJI leans on its established drone repair network, and BLUETTI's is serviceable if inconsistent.
Growth path
AC240P
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 1,843Wh.
Accepts up to 1,200W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Power 2000
EXPANDABLESupports DJI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,048Wh.
Accepts up to 1,800W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Generous port selection supports complex multi-device setups.
Expansion batteries are DJI-specific. You're investing in the DJI ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, but the Power 2000's higher solar ceiling (1,800W vs 1,200W) gives it the stronger off-grid growth path — more panels can feed a bigger bank as it grows.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
BLUETTI AC240P
The AC240P's IP65 seal has one hard rule reviewers flag: it only holds with every port cover closed. Use it in the rain with a cable plugged in and the rating is compromisedA1. Reviewers found that limitation matters less in practice than it sounds — left outside through a 6-hour rainstorm with covers closed, water beaded off and the interior stayed bone dry, and on a sailboat under constant saltwater spray it showed no moisture intrusion after a wipe-downA2.
It's positioned as the higher-capacity variant of BLUETTI's AC240 platform, adding 307Wh over the standard model with distinctive orange brandingA3, and reviewers call it the premium end of BLUETTI's lineup for its fast charging and expansion into a large multi-kWh bankA4.
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, but the protection applies only when all port covers are closed; using it with cables plugged in compromises the rating, and it shouldn't be used in the rain that way.”
Sources
storagereview.com · backuppowerhub.com · makeuseof.com · techradar.com · fstoppers.com · bluettipower.com
DJI Power 2000
Reviewers clocked the Power 2000 among the fastest-charging units tested — a full wall charge in around 90 minutes, with some measuring closer to an hour, and a full solar charge in about 75 minutes at its 1,800W ceilingB1. It's also one of the quietest tested, staying near-silent even under the heaviest loadsB2.
Its safety build draws heavily on DJI's drone background: flame-retardant materials, a nano-coated battery management system, 26 temperature sensors, 21 fuses, and a chassis rated to support a one-ton static loadB3. Reviewers who pushed it hard report it ran everything thrown at it and handled surges consistently, with deep integration for existing DJI drone owners as a bonusB4.
“Among the fastest-charging tested — a full wall charge in about 90 minutes (reviewers measured even faster, roughly an hour), and up to 1,800W of solar input for a full solar charge in about 75 minutes.”
Sources
bobvila.com · t3.com · thesolarlab.com · campingsolar.us · protoolreviews.com · greenerideal.com · dronexl.co
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- IP65 ruggedness proven in rain and saltwater, big expandability, and fast charging are the praise; the caveat is that water resistance only holds with port covers closed. [AC240P · 3 entries]
- Standout fast charging (wall and 1800W solar), near-silent operation, and an unusually robust safety-focused build are the consistent praise. [Power 2000 · 3 entries]
- A1
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, but the protection applies only when all port covers are closed; using it with cables plugged in compromises the rating, and it shouldn't be used in the rain that way.”
storagereview.com / backuppowerhub.com — BLUETTI AC240/AC240P review · 2026 · [mixed]
- A2
“Real-world weatherproofing held up — left outside in a 6-hour rainstorm, water beaded off and the interior stayed bone dry; used on a sailboat with constant saltwater spray, no moisture intrusion after wiping down the exterior.”
makeuseof.com / techradar.com — AC240/AC240P review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“The 1,843Wh AC240P is the higher-capacity option, adding 307Wh over the standard AC240, with distinctive orange IP65 branding; a solid choice if you need the extra capacity and prefer the more visible design.”
techradar.com / fstoppers.com — AC240P review · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Premium end of BLUETTI's lineup; LFP battery, a fast charge reaching most of full quickly, and expandable to a very large multi-kWh bank.”
bluettipower.com / techradar.com — AC240P specifications · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“Among the fastest-charging tested — a full wall charge in about 90 minutes (reviewers measured even faster, roughly an hour), and up to 1,800W of solar input for a full solar charge in about 75 minutes.”
bobvila.com / t3.com — DJI Power 2000 review · 2025-2026 · [positive]
- B2
“One of the quietest power stations tested — only about 29 dB at 5 feet when the fan kicked in, virtually silent, and it stayed among the quietest units even under the heaviest loads.”
bobvila.com / thesolarlab.com — DJI Power 2000 review · 2025-2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Built with an eightfold protection system — flame-retardant materials, a nano-coated BMS, 26 temperature sensors, 21 fuses, and structural reinforcement rated to support a one-ton static load — positioning it as one of the safest, most robust units on the market.”
campingsolar.us / protoolreviews.com — DJI Power 2000 review · 2025-2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Ran everything reviewers threw at it, handled surges consistently, and recharged incredibly fast, especially from solar; deep integration for DJI drone users is a unique advantage.”
greenerideal.com / dronexl.co — DJI Power 2000 review · 2025-2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the AC240P if you…
- →This unit will see actual rain or saltwater spray — the AC240P's IP65 rating is field-tested for exactly thatA2.
- →You're already inside BLUETTI's ecosystem and want its more mature app and community.
- →You want the field-proven track record of a platform reviewers have tested for years, not a two-year-old entrant.
Buy the Power 2000 if you…
- →You want the better price and ownership math — $640 less and roughly half the cost per lifetime kWh.
- →Weight and noise matter for how you'll use it day to day — 23.5 lbs lighter and 15dB quieter than the AC240P.
- →You want the fastest recharge here — up to 1,800W of solar input against the AC240P's 1,200WB1.
If neither fits
Both fall short of a full weekend of camping (2,100Wh) on their own — 134% for the AC240P, 121% for the Power 2000 — and further short on a van-life day at 269-299%. For loads that size, plan on expansion batteries or solar input regardless of which you pick.
The Bottom Line
The Power 2000 wins on nearly every number that matters for typical use: $640 less, more capacity, 15dB quieter, 23.5 lbs lighter, and roughly half the cost per lifetime kWh. For most buyers under any kind of roof, it's the stronger pick.
The AC240P's case is specific and real: a field-tested IP65 shell proven through a rainstorm and saltwater sprayA2, for buyers who need this unit genuinely exposed to weather. Outside that use case, the Power 2000 does more for less.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
BLUETTI AC240P or DJI Power 2000 — which should I buy?
For most buyers, the Power 2000: it's $640 cheaper, holds more capacity (2,048Wh vs 1,843Wh), runs 15dB quieter, and costs roughly half as much per lifetime kWh. The AC240P's case is narrower but real — a field-tested IP65 rating for genuine rain or saltwater exposure, which the Power 2000 doesn't claim.
Is the DJI Power 2000 as rugged as the AC240P?
Differently, not less. The AC240P is IP65-sealed and reviewers verified it through a rainstorm and constant saltwater spray. The Power 2000 carries no IP rating; instead it's built with 26 temperature sensors, 21 fuses, flame-retardant materials, and a chassis rated for a one-ton static load. One protects against weather, the other against internal failure — pick based on where the unit will actually live.
Which one charges faster?
The Power 2000, clearly. It accepts up to 1,800W of solar against the AC240P's 1,200W, and reviewers measured a full solar recharge in about 75 minutes and a wall charge around 90 minutes. That 600W solar advantage matters most in a multi-day outage, where refilling faster beats holding slightly less capacity.
Which is quieter and easier to carry?
The Power 2000 on both counts — 30dB against the AC240P's 45dB under load, and 48.5 lbs against 72, a 23.5-lb gap. Reviewers independently measured it among the quietest units tested even under heavy loads.
Can either be expanded with extra batteries?
Yes, both are expandable with batteries from their respective brands. The difference is solar ceiling: the Power 2000 accepts up to 1,800W against the AC240P's 1,200W, so as an off-grid setup grows, the Power 2000 hits its input bottleneck later.
Where to buy
BLUETTI AC240P
$1,461.99
$1,461.99 list · direct from BLUETTI
DJI Power 2000Pick
$1,299.00
$1,299.00 list · direct from DJI
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.