Head-to-head test
EcoFlow RIVER 2 vs BLUETTI Apex 300
Real-world runtimes, scenario verdicts, and ownership costs compared — which wins for your use case.
Full profiles: EcoFlow RIVER 2 → · BLUETTI Apex 300 →
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
Spec deltas
The EcoFlow RIVER 2 (256Wh) and BLUETTI Apex 300 (2,765Wh) sit in different weight classes. The real question: do your power needs justify the larger unit, or would you be overpaying for capacity that sits unused? These two aren't alternatives to each other. The Apex 300 holds 11× the energy and costs 8× as much, so this comes down to the load you need to cover rather than which unit is better. If the RIVER 2 carries your load, the Apex 300 is capacity you pay for and never use; if it doesn't, no amount of saving makes the RIVER 2 the answer.
What the spec gap means in practice: the Apex 300's 3,840W inverter has the headroom for a window AC, a full-size fridge, and power tools. The RIVER 2's 300W inverter can't run the heaviest of those — a window AC or a high-surge power tool needs more than it can hold, whatever its 600W surge ceiling does at the instant of startup. On stamina, the Apex 300 keeps a fridge alive for roughly 16 hours vs the RIVER 2's 1 hours. The cost? Portability. At 83.8 lbs, the Apex 300 is heavy enough to make you think twice about moving it. The RIVER 2 at 7.8 lbs is something one person can actually carry.
Pick the Apex 300 if your primary use is weekend camping or 8-hour blackout. Go with the RIVER 2 if its specific strengths below line up better with your use. Keep scrolling for the full breakdown. The scenario verdicts below hold a few surprises.
Bench Notes
What each unit does well, where it falls short, and the trade-offs that matter.
EcoFlow RIVER 2
At 300W, this unit is strictly for personal electronics (phones, laptops) and small CPAP machines. Do not expect to run kitchen appliances. At only 7.8 lbs, it is exceptionally portable. You can easily carry it one-handed to a campsite or tailgating party.
Strengths
- +Lighter by 76 lb
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-3,540W) limits appliance compatibility.
- –Sealed capacity — the Apex 300 can add batteries to grow past 256Wh; this one can't.
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 3,000 charge cycles vs the Apex 300's 6,000, so it wears out sooner.
BLUETTI Apex 300
With a massive 3,840W output, the Apex 300 can run high-wattage appliances like space heaters, hair dryers, and electric grills without tripping. Weighing in at 83.8 lbs, this is not a unit you want to carry far. It's best suited as a stationary backup or RV companion.
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 6,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Significantly heavier (+76 lbs), making it harder to move.
- –Very heavy unit that may be difficult for one person to lift.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on seven real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Apex 300
The RIVER 2 doesn't finish — 218Wh usable against the 2,100Wh this needs leaves it 1,882Wh short, about 10% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 250Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Apex 300
The RIVER 2 doesn't finish — 218Wh usable against the 1,645Wh this needs leaves it 1,427Wh short, about 13% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 705Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Apex 300
The RIVER 2 doesn't finish — 218Wh usable against the 320Wh this needs leaves it 102Wh short, about 68% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 2,030Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Apex 300
The RIVER 2 doesn't finish — 218Wh usable against the 910Wh this needs leaves it 692Wh short, about 24% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 1,440Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Apex 300
The RIVER 2 can start the 400W peak but not hold it — 600W of surge gets it going, then the 300W continuous rating takes over. The Apex 300 handles this scenario with 1,680Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the RIVER 2 comes up 4,467Wh short (about 5% covered), the Apex 300 2,335Wh (50%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
SCN-07 · an afternoon · needs 100Wh
Afternoon Off-Grid
Phones and a speaker at the park, beach, or campsite — the small-unit job description
Either unit
This row is here for the RIVER 2's class of job: phones and a speaker, 100Wh across an afternoon. Both cover it — the RIVER 2 finishes at 46% used, and the Apex 300 barely notices it. For this job the Apex 300's extra capacity is dead weight, not headroom; at 7.8 lbs the RIVER 2 is the easier carry, but it is no longer sold, so the Apex 300 is the one to plan around.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger (×2) 30W×2h · Bluetooth Speaker 10W×4h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Apex 300 runs 11.5h vs 1.1h.
$1,699 list · direct from BLUETTI
Planning for more than this? Describe your whole setup and get it sized →
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–156.7hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–31.3hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–2.4h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 10, 2026
Verdict: the Apex 300, on Power Score margin
These two units are closely matched on individual specs, but our Power Score analysis gives the Apex 300 the edge with a composite score of 4,644 vs 1,499.
Today the Apex 300 is $1,499, $200 under its typical $1,699. The verdict weighs typical prices, not today's. Prices checked 16 days ago.
Overall score margin: 1,499 vs 4,644 (−209.8%)
List prices as of July 10, 2026. The links below open BLUETTI's current price.
$1,499.00 · direct from BLUETTI
down from $1,699 · 12% below usual
Last checked 16 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 10, 2026
Black Friday · 38 days out
Price to beat:Apex 300 $1,499
The lowest we have recorded. A Black Friday price above it is a sale this unit has already had.
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): UPS, RV Living, Home Backup, CPAP, Solar Generator, Tailgating, Food Truck, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, RIVER 2 rates 3.9/5 (35th percentile of 24 Personal-class units), and Apex 300 rates 4.9/5 (92nd percentile of 26 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Apex 300: 83.8 lbs Is a Commitment
At 83.8 lbs, this is manageable but not fun to move. That's heavier than a large checked suitcase. How much it costs you depends on whether it rolls — wheels and a telescoping handle change the job completely at this weight, and our spec record doesn't track them, so look at the product photos before you plan on carrying it from the car.
Apex 300: 45dB Published
45dB is about as loud as a running refrigerator. It is BLUETTI's own rating rather than a reading on a shared bench — makers differ on whether they quote a best case or a figure under load, so treat it as a starting point rather than what you would hear at a bedside. For most people, fan noise around 45dB and up is where sleep starts to suffer.
RIVER 2: Fixed Capacity
The RIVER 2 is sealed at 256Wh — fine if that covers you, but it's the ceiling. By contrast the Apex 300 can add expansion batteries, though the first thing it has over the RIVER 2 is its own 2,765Wh base — expansion is the step after that, for the buyer who would outgrow 2,765Wh as well.
Apex 300: Power Lifting to 7,680W
The Apex 300 has BLUETTI's Power Lifting mode, which runs a resistive appliance rated up to 7,680W from its 3,840W inverter. It does that by delivering less power than the appliance asks for, not more than the inverter has: the heater still works, it just heats more slowly. Two things follow. BLUETTI scopes the mode to purely resistive loads — a heater, a kettle, an incandescent lamp — so it does nothing for a fridge compressor, a pump or a power tool, and this record publishes no surge figure at all, so read the mode as a resistive-load feature rather than as starting ability. And it is not a reason to size down, because running a load that big from 2,765Wh is a short session either way. Genuinely useful if a heater or a kettle is why you're buying; beside the point otherwise. The RIVER 2 publishes no equivalent.
UPS Switchover: ≤10ms vs ≤30ms
Both list a UPS mode, at different rated speeds. The Apex 300 is rated ≤10ms — quick enough on paper that desktop PCs and routers should ride through, treating that as the rating it is. The RIVER 2 is rated ≤30ms — a transfer this long is one many desktops will NOT ride through, so plan on reboots for sensitive gear. If a computer with unsaved work is the thing being protected, the stated class is worth the attention; nothing here is a lab result.
Warranty: No Difference
Both units carry the same 5-year warranty, so coverage isn't a tiebreaker here. The Apex 300's figure is a maximum rather than a guarantee — it depends on buying direct from BLUETTI or registering the unit, since reseller purchases carry a shorter term.
Battery Lifespan in Real Years
The Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 3,000. In real life: at daily use, that's 16.4 vs 8.2 years. At weekend use (twice a week), it's 58 vs 29 years. One caution reading years across different sizes: a cycle is 2,765Wh on the Apex 300 and 256Wh on the RIVER 2, so count lifetime energy — roughly 16,589 kWh against 768 kWh over the rated life. After hitting the cycle limit, the battery doesn't die — it drops to ~80% of original capacity, which is still very usable.
RIVER 2: Noise Level Not Disclosed
The Apex 300 publishes its noise level (45dB); the RIVER 2 doesn't publish one. That isn't evidence the RIVER 2 is louder — it means there's no figure to hold it to, and no way to compare the two on this without hearing them. If you're buying for a bedroom, a CPAP, or an apartment, treat the Apex 300's 45dB as the only published number on the table — a spec-sheet figure, not a measurement — and look for hands-on reports of the RIVER 2 before deciding.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Apex 300.
Check Apex 300 price →Ownership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The RIVER 2 is no longer sold, so there is no price to work its cost per kWh from, and this comparison doesn't quote one. On what you can actually buy today, the Apex 300 works out at $0.10/kWh over its rated life. If you already own the RIVER 2, the hardware comparison still holds: over its rated life the RIVER 2 delivers about 768 kWh and the Apex 300 about 16,589 kWh.
Brand trust
EcoFlow
Ecosystem
Largest in portable power — 12-15 models across DELTA Pro, DELTA 3, and RIVER 3 series, plus solar panels and smart home panels
Support
US-based phone/email/chat support (1-800-368-8604). Experiences are polarized — many report hassle-free prepaid-label replacements, but others report long waits and refurbished units sent for new claims. Pro tip: buying from Costco or Amazon gives you a stronger return safety net.
Community
Largest community in the space — Reddit r/Ecoflow_community (~31K members), multiple Facebook groups, and an official community forum
App experience
Rated 4.6/5 iOS (~8,400 ratings) · 4.2/5 Android (~17,000 ratings)
Unique strength
Fastest-charging technology (X-Stream), deepest product ecosystem, and most active innovation cadence. At the top of the range sit two whole-home paths: the TITAN line, one 5 kWh unit that grows to 30 kWh, and the DELTA Pro Ultra platform, which stacks batteries and inverters further — flagship paths, not line-wide features.
Worth knowing
Tested subscription paywalls for advanced app features in early 2025 before community backlash paused the plan. No parts or service offered out of warranty.
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship portable (Apex 300, 2764.8Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
Among the best capacity-to-price ratios available — several Elite and Apex units are the lowest $/Wh in the catalog. Widest product diversity including industry-firsts like sodium-ion cold-weather units and dual solar+alternator vehicle hubs. LFP across the rest of the range, though rated cycle life spans 2,500 (EB3A) to 6,000, and it varies WITHIN the Elite range rather than tracking it — the Elite 300 and Elite 200 V2 are rated 6,000 while the Elite 30 V2, Elite 10 Mini, Elite 320 and Elite 400 are rated 3,000+ and the Elite 100 V2 4,000+, so check the specific model. Dual-voltage (120V/240V) in flagships.
Worth knowing
Customer support inconsistency is the #1 risk factor. Older/discontinued units may become unrepairable — no spare parts policy for some models. Some reports of erratic communication from support agents.
Analyst note
EcoFlow positions itself as a mid-to-premium brand with stronger support infrastructure, while BLUETTI competes on value. The question is whether the EcoFlow ecosystem and support premium is worth it for your use case.
Growth path
RIVER 2
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 256Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 110W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Apex 300
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,765Wh.
Accepts up to 2,400W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Growth only counts if you can still buy in, and the RIVER 2 is no longer sold (EcoFlow points owners to the RIVER 2 240). That leaves the Apex 300: it starts at 2,765Wh and takes BLUETTI expansion batteries, so the ceiling moves if your needs do. The RIVER 2's fixed 256Wh still matters if you already own one, but it isn't a reason to pick it over the Apex 300.
What Owners Actually Report
Drawn from 50 comments on independent review channels — not from retailer reviews, which skew to the first week of ownership. Each line is our summary of one commenter's claim, linked to the original. We record what they said, including where it contradicts the spec sheet.
EcoFlow RIVER 2
37 claims from 27 comments · 30 from owners · 11 with figures
- Runtime
- 10 · 38% negative
- Price & value
- 5 · 20% negative
- Solar input
- 3 · 3% negative
- App & firmware
- 3 · 39% negative
- Durability
- 2 · 100% negative
What owners complain about
Used as a DC UPS it averaged well over 10W to deliver 5W to a cable modem.
Idle drainmeasuredowner6 agreedsource →
Display reads 0W output until roughly 15W is drawn; a 2W night light shows nothing.
App & firmwaremeasuredowner2 agreedsource →
His River 2 and Glacier both died blinking and non-functional just after warranty expired.
Durabilityowner4 agreedsource →
What owners praise
RIVER 2 pulled 120W from a 100W third-party panel over four days in a van.
Solar inputmeasuredowner15 agreedsource →
Ran router, PoE switch, NAS, modem and a NUC through two outages, cameras up about 2 hours.
Runtimemeasuredowner4 agreedsource →
River 2 plus a 100W panel is exactly the emergency-only setup he wanted and works great.
Price & valueowner31 agreedsource →
BLUETTI Apex 300
36 claims from 23 comments · 18 from owners · 6 with figures
- Price & value
- 10 · 8% negative
- Solar input
- 6 · 53% negative
- Inverter & surge
- 2 · 0% negative
- Build quality
- 2 · 0% negative
- Runtime
- 2 · 100% negative
What owners complain about
TV, router, Tablo and Firestick drain it from 100% in 7-9 hours; runtime figures are lies.
Runtimemeasuredownersource →
Dropping to a 60V PV max is a deal killer versus the 150V per string they run on the AC300.
Solar inputowner1 agreedsource →
App is portrait-only.
App & firmwareownersource →
What owners praise
Two paralleled units give 7,680W and run dryer, 2-ton AC or oven plus fridges and sump pump.
Inverter & surgemeasuredowner5 agreedsource →
$2,600 for two units plus $659 for the Hub A1 was worth the extra over the Anker.
Price & valuemeasuredowner5 agreedsource →
Three Apex 300s with a Hub A1 give him 18kW solar input and 12kW output.
Solar inputmeasuredownerafter 1 months10 agreedsource →
Claims are weighted by how specific they are, whether the commenter owns the unit, and how many readers agreed. Comments that mention a product under a rival's review count for more, because the commenter had no reason to be there. This is what buyers report, not our test results — for measurements we ran ourselves, see the methodology.
The Bottom Line
The full picture comes down to this. The Apex 300 edges ahead on our overall analysis, but the margin is narrow enough that your specific use case should drive the decision. Review the scenario verdicts above — if the RIVER 2 wins in the scenarios that match your life, it's the right choice regardless of aggregate scores.
If neither the RIVER 2 nor the Apex 300 feels like the right fit, your power needs probably sit outside what these two target. Use our comparison tool above to explore alternatives that better match your specific wattage and runtime requirements. Prices on portable power stations fluctuate frequently. Both EcoFlow and BLUETTI discount regularly, so check the current price before committing. Prime Day and Black Friday pricing typically drops 20-30%.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
How does the 2,508.8Wh capacity difference actually affect daily use?
The Apex 300's 2,764.8Wh battery keeps a mini-fridge running for roughly 16 hours vs the RIVER 2's 1 hours. Where it really matters: during an 8-hour blackout running your fridge, router, lights, AND charging your phone simultaneously (about 1,645Wh total), the Apex 300 handles it while the RIVER 2 runs dry. What specs don't mention: runtime drops 20-30% in cold weather (below 32°F/0°C) as battery chemistry slows down. The Apex 300's extra capacity provides a critical cold-weather buffer. For occasional phone and laptop charging, both are overkill. This gap only matters for sustained, multi-appliance use.
Can I actually carry the Apex 300, or is the RIVER 2 the only portable option?
The RIVER 2 at 7.8 lbs is genuinely grab-and-go. Toss it in a backpack, carry it one-handed to a picnic, take it on a boat. The Apex 300 at 83.8 lbs is a different story. It's like carrying a large suitcase full of books. If you're setting up and breaking down camp frequently, this weight difference will exhaust you by day two.
How fast can each unit recharge from solar panels in real conditions?
On paper, the Apex 300 accepts 2,400W vs the RIVER 2's 110W of solar input. What the spec sheet won't tell you: solar panels typically deliver only 60-80% of their rated output due to panel angle, cloud cover, and temperature. In realistic conditions, expect full recharge in about 1.6 hours for the Apex 300 and 3.3 hours for the RIVER 2. That gap widens on cloudy days, when the Apex 300's higher input ceiling captures more of whatever sunlight is available. One more thing: summer gives you ~7 productive solar hours per day. Winter drops to ~4. If solar is your primary recharge method, the Apex 300's advantage is substantial.
"6,000 vs 3,000 cycles" — what does that actually mean for me?
In real years: the Apex 300 (6,000 cycles) lasts 16.4 years at daily use, 58 years at weekend use (twice a week), or 250 years at twice-monthly camping trips. The RIVER 2 (3,000 cycles): 8.2 years daily, 29 years weekends, or 125 years twice-monthly. What most people miss: hitting the cycle limit doesn't kill your battery. Capacity drops to about 80%. Your 2,764.8Wh unit becomes a ~2,212Wh unit. Still very usable. For weekend users, both batteries will outlast the warranty by years.
What if I need more capacity than the RIVER 2's 256Wh later?
The RIVER 2 is sealed at 256Wh, so if you expect your needs to climb, the Apex 300 is the more future-proof pick: it starts at 2,764.8Wh and adds BLUETTI-compatible batteries without replacing the base unit. That said, "not expandable" isn't a flaw on its own — if 256Wh comfortably covers your loads, the RIVER 2 is a complete unit, not a downgrade.
Is EcoFlow or BLUETTI more reliable for long-term ownership?
Both brands have strengths and trade-offs. EcoFlow: Mixed. 2-5 years depending on model (DELTA Pro Ultra line gets 10 years). Some users report smooth claims; others report runarounds. Register your product to extend coverage. BLUETTI: 2-6 years depending on model (up to 10 years on home backup systems). Response times vary significantly. Some reports of units being deemed unrepairable with no parts available for older models. One piece of advice from the power station community: regardless of brand, buy from Costco or Amazon. Their return policies provide a safety net that manufacturer warranties alone can't match, especially for a product you'll rely on in emergencies. Both brands use LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries in their current lineup, the most proven chemistry for longevity and safety.
Bottom line: should I buy the RIVER 2 or the Apex 300?
We'd buy the Apex 300. The RIVER 2 is no longer sold, so there is no price to weigh it against; the comparison on this page still helps if you own one.
Brand matchup
EcoFlow vs BLUETTI: measured across every matchup →Where to buy
EcoFlow RIVER 2
Left EcoFlow's store
BLUETTI Apex 300Pick
$1,499.00
$1,499.00 · direct from BLUETTI
down from $1,699 · 12% below usual
Last checked 16 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.