Head-to-head test
Anker SOLIX F2600 vs BLUETTI AC240P
The F2600 costs $462 less and holds 717Wh more, so whatever case remains for the AC240P has to be made on surge headroom, warranty length, and a seal that's actually been rained on, not on price or capacity.
Written by Gunner GustafsonUpdated
Whole-Home Backup Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
Anker
SOLIX F2600
4,326Power Score · Appliance Class
$999.99 list · direct from Anker
BLUETTI
AC240P
3,528Power Score · Appliance Class
$1,461.99 list · direct from BLUETTI
Spec deltas
The SOLIX F2600 costs $1,000. The AC240P costs $1,462, $462 more for a battery that holds 717Wh less: 1,843Wh against the F2600's 2,560Wh. That's not a close call. Less money and more capacity, in the same box.
Divide price by capacity and the gap widens: 39 cents per watt-hour for the F2600, 79 cents for the AC240P, more than double, before either one gets plugged in. Run the math over each unit's full lifetime and it holds: 13 cents per kilowatt-hour delivered for the F2600 against 23 cents for the AC240P. The AC240P's extra warranty year and 500 additional rated cycles (3,500 against 3,000) are real. They just aren't enough to close a gap this size.
It plays out the same way in daily use. The F2600 covers a typical weekend camping trip at 97% of capacity and an 8-hour blackout at 76%, loads the AC240P can't fully clear, landing at 134% and 105%. Both handle a CPAP overnight without breaking a sweat. What the AC240P still has is a wider surge cushion for hard compressor starts, a weatherproof seal that's been tested wet, and a faster recharge off solar: real reasons to pick it, just none of them about money or size.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
Capacity
A buyer paying more per unit of energy while getting less total energy needs a specific reason beyond the spec sheet to justify it. Raw value doesn't make the AC240P's case, so whatever wins here has to be a capability the F2600 actually lacks.
F2600 costs $1,000 for 2,560Wh, 39 cents per watt-hour of capacity (1000/2560)AC240P costs $1,462 for 1,843Wh, 79 cents per watt-hour of capacity (1462/1843)
Why it mattersDon't default to the AC240P on the assumption that the higher price means it's simply the better unit. Name the capability you need first.
If you're starting a hard-kicking compressor, the F2600's 1.17x cushion is a tighter margin than the AC240P's 1.5x. This is the AC240P's clearest technical win on the page, and it has nothing to do with price.
F2600's 2,800W surge against its 2,400W continuous rating is a 1.17x ratio (2800/2400)AC240P's 3,600W surge against its 2,400W continuous rating is a 1.5x ratio (3600/2400)
Why it mattersBuyers who know they're starting a hard compressor load should weight this over the price gap. Everyone else should let lifetime cost decide.
For someone who leaves a power station exposed on a boat deck or an uncovered job site, that's still a real, field-proven reason to pay moreB2. For someone who plugs it in under a roof or brings it inside during weather, the seal never gets tested and the premium buys nothing.
AC240P's interior stayed dry through a 6-hour rainstorm and repeated saltwater spray in independent testingB2That IP65 rating only holds with every port cover closed; plugging in a cable outdoors compromises the sealB1
Why it mattersOnly buyers with actual outdoor exposure in their use case should let weatherproofing justify the AC240P's price.
solar input
In a multi-day outage where you're topping up off panels every morning, that's a real edge: the AC240P gets back to full sooner, even though there's less full to get back to. It doesn't overturn the scenario math; the F2600 still covers more of a given day's load. But it's a genuine reason the AC240P isn't simply the worse unit.
F2600's 2,560Wh capacity divided by its 1,000W max solar input is about 2.5 hours for a full charge at max rate (2560/1000)AC240P's 1,843Wh capacity divided by its 1,200W max solar input is about 1.5 hours at max rate (1843/1200)
Why it mattersBuyers recharging mainly off solar in short daylight windows should weigh refill speed, not just total capacity, before writing off the AC240P.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: Cost per lifetime kWh is now a blowout, not a close call, and it's the clearest number on the page.
cost / lifetime kWh
13 cents per lifetime kilowatt-hour against 23. The F2600 is the cheaper unit to own by nearly half, and that's before counting its $462 lower purchase price. The AC240P's extra warranty year and higher rated cycle count are real, but they don't close a gap this size. Even spread across a longer life, its smaller, pricier battery still costs more for every kilowatt-hour it delivers.
Cost per warranty year tells the same story from a different angle: $200 a year for the F2600 against $244 for the AC240P. Neither is what you'd call cheap in isolation. Only one of them is cheaper.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: Real-world loads show exactly where the F2600's capacity edge turns into the AC240P falling short outright.
The F2600 covers weekend camping at 97% of capacity and an 8-hour blackout at 76%. The AC240P can't fully clear either one, landing at 134% and 105% of what it holds. Those aren't close misses; that's the battery running out before the job's done. Remote workday and tailgate party go the same direction, though more narrowly: both units can technically handle each load, the F2600 just does it with more room to spare, 42% and 31% of capacity against the AC240P's 58% and 43%.
CPAP overnight is a real tie. Both land comfortably under a quarter of capacity used. Van-life daily power draw is a tie in the other direction: at 215% and 299% of what each unit holds, neither one is sized for full-time rig living.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Surge headroom, noise disclosure, and UPS speed are the AC240P's genuine remaining strengths.
rated cycles
The AC240P's surge ceiling is the honest standout here: 3,600W against a 2,400W continuous rating is a 1.5x cushion, versus the F2600's 1.17x (2,800W over 2,400W). Compressor loads kick 2-3x their running draw at startup, so that extra headroom is a real, physical advantage, not a spec-sheet flex.
Noise cuts the other way on information, not necessarily on volume: the AC240P publishes 45dB under load, while the F2600 doesn't publish a number at all. A moderate published figure beats no figure for anyone planning around fan noise, including CPAP buyers weighing whether a unit two feet from their pillow will wake them. UPS switchover favors the AC240P too, 15ms against 20ms, though both land well inside the range where sensitive electronics won't notice the difference.
Growth Path
Selected because: Both expand; worth flagging that only the F2600 documents a specific ceiling.
solar input
Both expand, so expandability itself isn't the deciding factor. The difference is how well each documents where it goes. The F2600's BP2600 module scales it to a specific, published 4,608WhA2. The AC240P's expansion is described as reaching a large multi-kWh bank, without the same concrete ceiling in the recordB4.
If you want to know the exact number you're growing into before you buy, the F2600 gives you one. If you just want to know you're not locked out later, both qualify.
Brand Trust
Selected because: Cross-brand pair; support and app quality differ enough to matter.
Anker's support is US-based, though recent reports describe more generic, AI-driven handling on returns for heavy units, a real step down from the brand's historically strong reputation. BLUETTI's app is tied for the best-rated in the category after a well-received redesign, but its support remains the more inconsistent of the two, running on email with timezone delays.
Neither brand wins cleanly on service. What's changed is that the AC240P no longer has price or capacity to fall back on if support lets you down. Its case now rests entirely on what it does better as a product, not what it costs.
Strengths & trade-offs
Anker SOLIX F2600
Strengths
- +Costs $462 less
- +Lighter by 1.5 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
BLUETTI AC240P
Strengths
- +Longer warranty
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$462) than the SOLIX F2600.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
SOLIX F2600
A typical 2,100Wh weekend load is 97% of the F2600's capacity, tight but doable. The AC240P needs 134% of what it holds, so it runs out before the weekend does.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
SOLIX F2600
Same story at outage scale: the F2600 covers the load at 76% of capacity, the AC240P falls short at 105%. It doesn't quite make it through the night.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
Both units handle this easily, using 15% and 20% of capacity respectively. This is the one load where capacity isn't the deciding factor for either unit.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
SOLIX F2600
Both can run a remote workday, but the F2600 does it with more room to spare, 42% of capacity used against the AC240P's 58%.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
SOLIX F2600
Both cover a tailgate's power draw, the F2600 more comfortably at 31% of capacity against the AC240P's 43%.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither is built for this. Full-time rig living needs about 4,685Wh a day, more than double what either unit holds, at 215% and 299% of capacity respectively.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: SOLIX F2600 runs 10.6h vs 7.6h.
$999.99 list · direct from Anker
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–145.1hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–29hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–2.2h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 26, 2026
Verdict: the SOLIX F2600
The F2600 wins on every number that used to be close. It's $462 cheaper, holds 717Wh more capacity, and costs 13 cents per lifetime kWh against the AC240P's 23. It also takes every scenario where the two differ: weekend camping, an 8-hour blackout, remote workday, and tailgate party, while both handle CPAP overnight and neither covers van-life daily use. The AC240P's remaining case is real but narrow: a wider surge cushion for hard compressor starts, a longer warranty, and IP65 sealing that's held up in independent rain and saltwater testing. Buy the F2600 unless you can name the specific job, a hard-starting compressor or genuine outdoor exposure, that the AC240P's extra dollars are buying.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 26, 2026. The links below open Anker's and BLUETTI's current prices.
$999.99 list · direct from Anker
or check the AC240P price$1,461.99 list
Written by Gunner Gustafson, Whole-Home Backup Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 26, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, SOLIX F2600 rates 4.0/5 (42nd percentile of 25 Large-class units), and AC240P rates 4.2/5 (52nd percentile of 24 Everyday-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Weight Reality Check
70.5 lbs against 72 lbs, a 1.5-lb difference that won't change how you lift either one. Both are a two-hands, bent-knees job out of a trunk.
AC240P Publishes 45dB Under Load
A measured number, even a moderate one, beats no number at all. Buyers planning around fan noise, CPAP users especially, have a concrete figure to check against the AC240P and nothing published for the F2600.
AC240P's Surge Cushion Is Wider
3,600W surge against a 2,400W continuous rating gives the AC240P a 1.5x ratio; the F2600's 2,800W surge is 1.17x. Compressor loads spike 2-3x their running draw at startup, so that extra headroom is a real advantage for hard-starting appliances, the clearest technical win the AC240P has.
Both Switch Fast Enough to Matter Less Than You'd Think
15ms for the AC240P against 20ms for the F2600. The AC240P is nominally quicker, but both land well inside the range where sensitive electronics won't notice the gap.
F2600's Noise Level Isn't Published
There's no measured dB figure to weigh against the AC240P's documented 45dB under load, an information gap, not necessarily a loudness problem.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the SOLIX F2600.
Check SOLIX F2600 price →or check the AC240P priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The SOLIX F2600 wins on both sticker price and long-term value. At $0.13/kWh over its lifetime, it's meaningfully cheaper to own. Clear value winner.
Delivers each lifetime kWh for $0.10 less — check the SOLIX F2600 price →
Brand trust
Anker
Ecosystem
7-8 SOLIX portable power stations across C-series (compact) and F-series (flagship), plus the X1 home energy system
Support
US-based support. Historically known for incredible no-hassle replacements, but recent reports describe AI-driven support agents giving generic responses and complex return logistics for heavy units (hazmat shipping). The Anker brand reputation is still strong, but SOLIX-specific support quality is trending down.
Community
Moderate — active Reddit (r/Anker, r/AnkerSOLIXCommunity) and growing. Benefits from Anker's massive consumer electronics brand awareness.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS (~1,100 ratings) · 4.3/5 Android
Unique strength
Anker's SOLIX line draws on the parent brand's consumer-electronics scale, and the F2600's expansion ceiling is a specific, documented number rather than a vague promise.
Worth knowing
SOLIX-specific support has reportedly trended toward more generic, AI-driven handling, especially on return logistics for heavy units, a step down from Anker's historically strong reputation.
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship (Apex 300, 3072Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
BLUETTI's app is tied for the best-rated in the category after a well-received redesign, and the AC240P carries an IP65 rating for dust and water resistance that the F2600 doesn't have at all.
Worth knowing
BLUETTI support remains the more inconsistent of the two brands, with email-based, timezone-delayed handling that some owners describe as a runaround.
Analyst note
Neither brand wins cleanly on service. What's changed is that the AC240P no longer has price or capacity to fall back on. Its case now rests entirely on what it does as a product, not on brand reputation or the sticker.
Growth path
SOLIX F2600
EXPANDABLESupports Anker expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,560Wh.
Accepts up to 1,000W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Generous port selection supports complex multi-device setups.
Expansion batteries are Anker-specific. You're investing in the Anker ecosystem.
AC240P
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 1,843Wh.
Accepts up to 1,200W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, so neither locks you out of growth — decide on capacity, price, and the rest, not the expansion checkbox.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
Anker SOLIX F2600
The F2600's HyperFlash charging reaches 0-80% in about 78 minutesA1, and its expansion path is a documented one: the BP2600 module scales it to 4,608Wh over Anker's link cableA2. It runs on InfiniPower LFP cells rated for 3,000 cycles behind a 5-year warranty, and reviewers credit it specifically for outage performance and ease of use, not just spec-sheet numbersA4. Owners separately praise the inverter's headroom, quiet running, and a straightforward app; the one recurring gripe is that the expansion cable itself could be routed more cleanlyA3.
“Packs 2,560Wh into the same footprint as the F2000, with HyperFlash fast charging reaching 0-80% in about 78 minutes.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · ankersolix.com · homedepot.com · outboundpower.com · samsclub.com · batteryskills.com · thesolarlab.com
BLUETTI AC240P
The AC240P's field record centers on its IP65 durability holding up outside the spec sheet: reviewers left it through a six-hour rainstorm and ran it on a sailboat through constant saltwater spray, and the interior stayed dry both timesB2. The real caveat is that the rating only applies with port covers closed; plug in a cable outdoors and the seal is compromised, so it isn't weatherproof mid-use in the strictest senseB1. It's the higher-capacity version of BLUETTI's rugged AC240 platform, adding 307Wh over the base model with more visible orange brandingB3, and it carries fast charging plus a large expansion ceiling as part of the same packageB4.
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, but the protection applies only when all port covers are closed; using it with cables plugged in compromises the rating, and it shouldn't be used in the rain that way.”
Sources
storagereview.com · backuppowerhub.com · makeuseof.com · techradar.com · fstoppers.com · bluettipower.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Fast HyperFlash charging, quiet operation, a good app, expandability, and a 5-year warranty are the standout praise for this 2,560Wh unit. [SOLIX F2600 · 3 entries]
- IP65 ruggedness proven in rain and saltwater, big expandability, and fast charging are the praise; the caveat is that water resistance only holds with port covers closed. [AC240P · 3 entries]
- A1
“Packs 2,560Wh into the same footprint as the F2000, with HyperFlash fast charging reaching 0-80% in about 78 minutes.”
backuppowerhub.com / ankersolix.com — SOLIX F2600 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Expandable via the BP2600 battery module, scaling total capacity to 4,608Wh through Anker's proprietary link cable.”
homedepot.com / outboundpower.com — SOLIX F2600 / BP2600 · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“Owners praise ample inverter power, quiet operation, and a user-friendly app; some suggest the cable design could be more space-efficient.”
samsclub.com / batteryskills.com — SOLIX F2600 owner reviews · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“InfiniPower LFP rated for 3,000 cycles with a 5-year warranty; well-received for power-outage performance and ease of use.”
backuppowerhub.com / thesolarlab.com — SOLIX F2600 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, but the protection applies only when all port covers are closed; using it with cables plugged in compromises the rating, and it shouldn't be used in the rain that way.”
storagereview.com / backuppowerhub.com — BLUETTI AC240/AC240P review · 2026 · [mixed]
- B2
“Real-world weatherproofing held up — left outside in a 6-hour rainstorm, water beaded off and the interior stayed bone dry; used on a sailboat with constant saltwater spray, no moisture intrusion after wiping down the exterior.”
makeuseof.com / techradar.com — AC240/AC240P review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“The 1,843Wh AC240P is the higher-capacity option, adding 307Wh over the standard AC240, with distinctive orange IP65 branding; a solid choice if you need the extra capacity and prefer the more visible design.”
techradar.com / fstoppers.com — AC240P review · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Premium end of BLUETTI's lineup; LFP battery, a fast charge reaching most of full quickly, and expandable to a very large multi-kWh bank.”
bluettipower.com / techradar.com — AC240P specifications · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 26, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the SOLIX F2600 if you…
- →Anyone comparing on price, capacity, or lifetime cost per kWh: the F2600 wins all three outright, by a wider margin than it used to.
- →Buyers who want a specific, documented expansion ceiling (4,608WhA2) instead of a vaguer 'large bank' promise.
Buy the AC240P if you…
- →Anyone starting a hard-kicking compressor load, a fridge, an AC, a well pump, where the AC240P's 1.5x surge cushion has real headroom the F2600's 1.17x doesn't match.
- →Anyone who leaves a power station truly exposed outdoors, a boat, an uncovered job site, where IP65 sealing tested in real rain and saltwaterB2 is worth paying more for.
- →Buyers who want the extra warranty year, the extra rated cycles, or the faster solar recharge, and are willing to pay more per kWh for them.
If neither fits
Van-life daily power draw runs about 4,685Wh. Both units land well over 200% of that, so neither is sized for full-time rig living. That buyer needs a larger fixed or multi-battery system.
The Bottom Line
The numbers used to be close enough that this came down to taste. They aren't anymore: the F2600 is $462 cheaper, holds 717Wh more, and costs 13 cents per lifetime kilowatt-hour against the AC240P's 23. It also takes weekend camping, the 8-hour blackout, remote workday, and tailgate party outright.
The AC240P's case is real, just narrower than it was: a wider surge cushion for hard compressor starts, a longer warranty, and a seal that's actually been rained onB2. If you can name that specific reason, buy the AC240P. If you can't, the F2600 is the easy call now, not just the likely one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the BLUETTI AC240P still worth the extra money over the SOLIX F2600?
Only for a specific reason: its wider surge cushion for hard compressor starts, its proven IP65 weatherproofing, or its longer warranty and higher cycle count. On price, capacity, and lifetime cost per kWh, the F2600 wins outright, and that gap is now bigger than it used to be.
Which one is cheaper to own over its lifetime?
The F2600, by a wide margin: 13 cents per lifetime kilowatt-hour against the AC240P's 23 cents, on top of a $462 lower purchase price. The AC240P's extra warranty year and higher cycle count don't close that gap.
Can either unit handle a weekend camping trip?
The F2600 can, using 97% of its capacity for a typical 2,100Wh weekend load. The AC240P can't; it would need 134% of what it holds, meaning it runs out before the trip does.
Which one recharges faster from solar?
The AC240P does, on paper. Its smaller 1,843Wh battery paired with a 1,200W max solar input works out to about 1.5 hours for a full charge at max rate, against the F2600's roughly 2.5 hours (2,560Wh over a 1,000W input). It just has less capacity to refill in the first place.
Does the AC240P's weatherproofing hold up while it's actually in use?
Mostly, but with a real caveat: the IP65 rating only applies with all port covers closed, so plugging in a cable outdoors technically compromises the seal. In independent testing, though, units running through active rain and sea spray still came through with no moisture intrusion.
Where to buy
Anker SOLIX F2600Pick
$999.99
$999.99 list · direct from Anker
BLUETTI AC240P
$1,461.99
$1,461.99 list · direct from BLUETTI
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.