Head-to-head test
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 vs Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Same battery, different bodies — 5.2Wh and zero cycles apart — so this comes down to which one can actually start what you plug into it.
Written by Gunner GustafsonUpdated
Whole-Home Backup Tester, Station Arena Test Desk

Anker
SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
4,157Power Score · Appliance Class
$999.99 list · direct from Anker

Jackery
Explorer 2000 Plus
4,407Power Score · Appliance Class
$899.00 list · direct from Jackery
Spec deltas
These two hold nearly identical capacity — 2,048Wh for the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2, 2,042.8Wh for the Explorer 2000 Plus, a 5.2Wh gap that's a rounding error. Both are rated for 4,000 cycles and carry a 5-year warranty.
The Explorer 2000 Plus now costs $899 against the SOLIX's $999.99 — so the cheaper unit is also the more powerful one. The SOLIX weighs 41.7 lbs against the Explorer's 61.5, a real 19.8-lb advantage, but that portability is now the main thing its extra ~$100 buys. On output the Explorer leads outright: 3,000W continuous and a 6,000W surge against the SOLIX's 2,400W and 4,000W.
Reviewers call the Explorer 2000 Plus dependable and quiet even under a full 3,000W load, with genuinely useful expandability for RVs and off-grid setupsB1B2. It's also not light — testers say it still demands a two-person lift for stairs despite the included wheelsB3.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
Capacity
Every scenario reflects that: Weekend Camping, CPAP Overnight, Remote Workday, and Van Life Daily all land within a single percentage point of each other for both units. The real gap isn't capacity — it's about $100, and it now runs the Jackery's way.
SOLIX holds 2,048Wh, Explorer 2000 Plus holds 2,042.8Wh (5.2Wh apart)Both rated 4,000 cycles, both carry a 5-year warranty
Why it mattersAnyone shopping on watt-hours alone should stop comparing these two and start comparing their bank accounts.
continuous output
As a ratio of surge to continuous rating, that's 2.0x for the Explorer against 1.7x for the SOLIX — the wider margin that actually decides whether a compressor's startup spike trips the inverter or doesn't.
SOLIX outputs 2,400W continuous / 4,000W surgeExplorer 2000 Plus outputs 3,000W continuous / 6,000W surge (600W more continuous, 2,000W more surge)
Why it mattersAnyone running power tools or starting a hard compressor load off-grid should weight this over the identical capacity number both units share.
For a router, modem, or CPAP, 10ms is generally imperceptible; 20ms starts to be the range where some equipment blinks or reboots.
SOLIX switches to battery backup in 10msExplorer 2000 Plus switches in 20ms
Why it mattersBuyers using this specifically as a UPS should lean SOLIX; buyers who mainly care about running big loads off-grid won't notice the gap.
solar input
Owners confirm both sides of that trade directly: dual MPPT inputs up to roughly 1,200-1,400WB5, and a unit that still demands a two-person lift for stairs despite its wheels and handleB3.
Explorer 2000 Plus accepts up to 1,200W of solar vs SOLIX's 800W (400W more)Explorer 2000 Plus weighs 61.5 lbs vs SOLIX's 41.7 lbs (19.8 lbs more)
Why it mattersIf this is living in a van or truck bed and staying put, the solar ceiling wins the argument; if it's getting carried anywhere by hand, the weight does.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: Capacity is a near-dead heat here — worth showing plainly before moving to what actually differs.
Every scenario here is close enough to call a coin flip. Weekend Camping needs 2,100Wh and both units land at 121% of their own capacity — neither covers it. CPAP Overnight, Remote Workday, and Tailgate Party split by a single percentage point at most (18% vs 18%, 52% vs 52%, 38% vs 39%), and Van Life Daily sits at 269% vs 270% of what's needed — also a shared no. The capacity story here is a dead heat; the decision lives in the gotchas below.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Surge ratio and UPS switchover are the two specs that actually separate these units.
The Explorer 2000 Plus runs 600W more continuously and surges 2,000W higher — 6,000W against 4,000W, a 2.0x surge-to-rated ratio versus the SOLIX's 1.7x. That's genuine headroom for hard compressor starts or running two big loads at once. The SOLIX answers with a faster UPS switchover, 10ms against 20ms, better suited to protecting sensitive electronics through a blip than to running power tools through a blackout.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: Same lifetime energy delivered, so the entire cost gap is pure price difference.
cost / lifetime kWh
$0.11 per lifetime kWh for the Explorer 2000 Plus against $0.12 for the SOLIX — both units deliver essentially the same total lifetime energy on the same 4,000 cycles, so the entire gap is the ~$100 price difference, not anything about durability, and it now runs the Jackery's way. Cost per warranty year: $180 for the Explorer against $200 for the SOLIX.
Growth Path
Selected because: The Explorer 2000 Plus's higher solar ceiling is a real edge worth naming on its own.
solar input
Both support expansion batteries, but the Explorer 2000 Plus's 1,200W solar input against the SOLIX's 800W means it refills a growing setup faster as panels are added — the one real edge in this section, and it comes with 19.8 extra pounds attached.
Strengths & trade-offs
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Strengths
- +Lighter by 19.8 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-600W) limits appliance compatibility.
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Strengths
- +Costs $101 less
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Significantly heavier (+19.8 lbs), making it harder to move.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 2,100Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Either unit
Both survive the blackout with similar margin. Since the capacity difference doesn't matter here, focus on which unit has UPS mode — seamless switchover protects your router and PC from the split-second power gap.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
Both are wildly overqualified for CPAP. You're using 18% or less. Save your money and buy whichever is cheaper; the extra capacity is completely wasted on a 40W overnight load. Put the savings toward a second battery for multi-night trips.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Either unit
Both power your workstation all day without breaking a sweat. At these utilization levels, prioritize the unit with better USB-C output for direct laptop charging. It's more convenient than using the AC inverter and wastes less energy.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Either unit
Both handle game day easily. Since capacity isn't the deciding factor, consider weight: the lighter unit is easier to load into a truck bed. Also check if either has Bluetooth speaker-level noise. Fan sound matters in social settings.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
Dead heat — both run this 205W load for roughly 8.5h. Pick on price, weight, or ports.
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–116.1hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–23.2hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–1.7h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the Explorer 2000 Plus
Take the Explorer 2000 Plus. With the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 now at $999.99 against the Explorer's $899, the value case has flipped: the Jackery is about $100 cheaper for essentially the same energy — 2,042.8Wh vs 2,048Wh, both 4,000 cycles, both 5 years — and it's the more capable unit on top of that, with a 3,000W inverter and 6,000W surge (a 2.0x ratio) against the SOLIX's 2,400W and 4,000W (1.7x), plus 1,200W of solar input against 800W. The SOLIX keeps two genuine edges — it weighs 19.8 lbs less and switches to battery in 10ms against the Explorer's 20ms — so it's still the pick if you carry it by hand often or lean on it as a UPS for sensitive electronics. For most buyers, though, the cheaper and stronger unit is the Jackery.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open Anker's and Jackery's current prices.
$899.00 list · direct from Jackery
or check the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 price$999.99 list
Written by Gunner Gustafson, Whole-Home Backup Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): CPAP, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 rates 4.1/5 (46th percentile of 25 Large-class units), and Explorer 2000 Plus rates 4.5/5 (71st percentile of 25 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Explorer 2000 Plus: 61.5 lbs Is a Commitment
At 61.5 lbs, this is manageable but not fun to carry. That's heavier than a large checked suitcase. Moving it from your car to a campsite requires some effort and flat terrain.
The Explorer's Real Edge
6,000W of surge on a 3,000W continuous rating is a 2.0x ratio, against 4,000W on 2,400W, or 1.7x, for the SOLIX. That headroom is the honest reason to pick the heavier, pricier unit if you're starting hard motor loads.
10ms vs 20ms: A UPS-Specific Gap
The SOLIX switches to battery in 10ms against the Explorer 2000 Plus's 20ms. Both qualify as UPS-capable, but the SOLIX leaves less of a gap for sensitive electronics to notice a grid drop.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Explorer 2000 Plus.
Check Explorer 2000 Plus price →or check the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
Both units have similar long-term ownership costs ($0.12/kWh vs $0.11/kWh). The price difference is what you see on the sticker — neither is a hidden bargain or rip-off.
Brand trust
Anker
Ecosystem
7-8 SOLIX portable power stations across C-series (compact) and F-series (flagship), plus the X1 home energy system
Support
US-based support. Historically known for incredible no-hassle replacements, but recent reports describe AI-driven support agents giving generic responses and complex return logistics for heavy units (hazmat shipping). The Anker brand reputation is still strong, but SOLIX-specific support quality is trending down.
Community
Moderate — active Reddit (r/Anker, r/AnkerSOLIXCommunity) and growing. Benefits from Anker's massive consumer electronics brand awareness.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS (~1,100 ratings) · 4.3/5 Android
Unique strength
Anker's Gen 2 SOLIX pricing undercuts most direct competitors at the same capacity by a wide margin.
Worth knowing
Support quality is reportedly trending down from Anker's historically excellent standard.
Jackery
Ecosystem
12-15+ models across Explorer (portable) and HomePower (home backup) series, plus SolarSaga panel ecosystem and innovative form factors
Support
US-based support but widely criticized. Reddit reports describe slow/dismissive responses, scripted AI agents, strict receipt requirements for warranty claims, and refurbished replacements for clearly defective units. Strongly recommended: buy from Costco or Amazon for return protection.
Community
Smallest community of the major brands — Reddit r/Jackery has ~2,000 members. YouTube presence is solid due to brand recognition.
App experience
Rated 2.3-3.3/5 iOS and Android — the weakest app experience of the major brands. Multiple confusing apps (Jackery app vs Jackery Home) and mandatory login even offline.
Unique strength
Widest retail distribution and highest brand recognition in the category — the dependable, proven choice.
Worth knowing
Jackery's app is broadly considered the weakest in the category, split across two confusing apps with mandatory login even offline, even though owners of this specific unit describe its version as handling the essentials reasonably well.
Analyst note
Jackery's overall app reputation is the weakest among major brands, though this specific unit's reviews are milder than that reputation suggests. Anker still has the better app and the lighter, UPS-faster unit — but it no longer holds the price or per-watt-hour edge here, both of which have crossed to the cheaper Explorer 2000 Plus.
Growth path
SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
EXPANDABLESupports Anker expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,048Wh.
Accepts up to 800W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Generous port selection supports complex multi-device setups.
Expansion batteries are Anker-specific. You're investing in the Anker ecosystem.
Explorer 2000 Plus
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,043Wh.
Accepts up to 1,200W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, but the Explorer 2000 Plus's higher solar ceiling (1,200W vs 800W) gives it the stronger off-grid growth path — more panels can feed a bigger bank as it grows.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
Notebookcheck called the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 a convincing performance with few points of criticism — one of the more attractive 2kWh power stations on the marketA4. Its app draws similar praise, giving owners a clean way to monitor charging and use over Bluetooth or Wi-FiA3, a detail worth flagging next to Jackery's own app reputation, which trails the category overall.
Reviewers also describe it as genuinely simple to live with — no firmware downloads, no odd voltage drops, just plug in and go, with rapid charging and a premium-feeling buildA2 — and quiet even pushed to full output, the fans staying a subdued, easily-backgrounded whirrA1. This coverage leans on hands-on reviews rather than a mature owner forum; no six-month-plus field reports have surfaced yet, so treat it as early but consistent.
“Even at full power it's far quieter than any other powerful Anker station tested — the fans never rise above a subdued, easily-backgrounded whirr, working largely silently and only occasionally reaching a pleasantly quiet ~35 dB at 1 m under high load.”
Sources
notebookcheck.net · thesolarlab.com · trustedreviews.com · androidguys.com
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Reviewers describe the Explorer 2000 Plus as dependable and easy to use, relatively quiet even under a full 3,000W load, with universal compatibility from CPAP machines to electric grillsB1. Its expandability is the standout: each unit's battery can grow to a much larger bank, and pairing two units unlocks 6,000W of combined output, aimed squarely at RVs, home backup, and serious off-grid setupsB2.
It's not light — around 61 lbs, and reviewers note that despite the included wheels and handle, it still demands a two-person lift for stairsB3. The app nails the essentials, with pro-level insights like cycle counts and efficiency graphs, but reviewers say it lacks some of the polish rivals haveB4. Solar input is a genuine strength: dual MPPT inputs accepting roughly 1,200 to 1,400W, paired with an IP65-rated build on key portsB5.
“Reviewers describe it as dependable, easy to use, and relatively quiet even under a 3000W load, with universal compatibility for powering everything from CPAP machines to electric grills.”
Sources
outdoorgearlab.com · thesolarpit.com · jackery.com · voltagebasics.com · storagereview.com · thesolarlab.com · tipselite3s.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Reviewers consistently praise quiet operation, fast charging, premium build, and no-fuss plug-and-play simplicity. [SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 · 3 entries]
- Standout expandability (up to 24kWh dual), a rugged IP65 build with wheels, and dependable quiet operation are the praise; the heavy weight and an app that needs polish are the caveats. [Explorer 2000 Plus · 3 entries]
- A1
“Even at full power it's far quieter than any other powerful Anker station tested — the fans never rise above a subdued, easily-backgrounded whirr, working largely silently and only occasionally reaching a pleasantly quiet ~35 dB at 1 m under high load.”
notebookcheck.net / thesolarlab.com — Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Really simple to use — no need to download firmware or deal with weird voltage drops; you just turn it on, plug in, and go. Rapid charging and premium build.”
trustedreviews.com / thesolarlab.com — Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“The Anker Solix app is a good way to monitor the station during charging and use over Bluetooth or Wi-Fi; reviewers appreciated the monitoring functionality.”
androidguys.com — Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Delivers a convincing performance with few points of criticism — undoubtedly one of the most attractive 2 kWh power stations on the market.”
notebookcheck.net — Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“Reviewers describe it as dependable, easy to use, and relatively quiet even under a 3000W load, with universal compatibility for powering everything from CPAP machines to electric grills.”
outdoorgearlab.com / thesolarpit.com — Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Massive expandability — each unit's battery expands up to 12kWh, and pairing two units gives 6000W output and up to 24kWh total, ideal for RVs, home backup, or serious off-grid setups.”
jackery.com / thesolarpit.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Not light at around 61-62 lbs — included wheels and a handle help on smooth surfaces, but it still demands a two-person lift for stairs.”
outdoorgearlab.com / voltagebasics.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [mixed]
- B4
“The app nails the essentials with pro-level insights like cycle counts and efficiency graphs, but it lacks some of the bells and whistles of rivals and still needs polishing.”
storagereview.com / thesolarlab.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [mixed]
- B5
“Strong solar with two MPPT inputs (up to ~1,200-1,400W), plus a tank-like build with IP65 dust and water resistance on key ports.”
storagereview.com / tipselite3s.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2 if you…
- →Buyers who carry the unit by hand often — the SOLIX weighs 19.8 lbs less (41.7 against 61.5), the main thing its ~$100 premium now buys.
- →Anyone using this as a UPS for sensitive electronics, where the 10ms switchover beats the Explorer's 20ms.
Buy the Explorer 2000 Plus if you…
- →Most buyers: it's now about $100 cheaper than the SOLIX for the same ~2,042.8Wh, and it's the stronger unit too — 3,000W continuous, a 2.0x surge ratio, and 1,200W of solar input.
- →Buyers running power tools, large compressors, or multiple big appliances at once, where 600W more continuous output and a 6,000W surge actually matter.
If neither fits
Full weekend camping trips and daily van life both outrun this class regardless of which one you pick — both land at 121% of a typical weekend's 2,100Wh need and around 270% of a 4,685Wh van-life day. Look at a larger-capacity unit for either use case.
The Bottom Line
These are nearly the same battery — 2,048Wh against 2,042.8Wh, both on 4,000 cycles, both quiet at 30dB — but the prices have crossed: the Explorer 2000 Plus is now about $100 cheaper at $899 against the SOLIX's $999.99, and it carries the stronger inverter and solar ceiling on top.
Buy the Explorer 2000 Plus unless weight or UPS speed is the deciding factor — it's the cheaper unit and the more capable one. Buy the SOLIX if you carry it by hand often, since it weighs 19.8 lbs less, or if you need its faster 10ms UPS switchover for sensitive electronics.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus really the same capacity as the SOLIX C2000 Gen 2?
Essentially, yes — 2,042.8Wh against 2,048Wh, a 5.2Wh gap that's a rounding error. Both are rated for 4,000 cycles and carry a 5-year warranty, so this comparison isn't really about capacity at all.
The Explorer 2000 Plus is now cheaper than the SOLIX — is it also the better unit?
At $899 against the SOLIX's $999.99 it's about $100 less, and yes — it also carries more inverter headroom (600W more continuous output, a 2.0x surge ratio against the SOLIX's 1.7x) and a higher 1,200W solar ceiling against 800W. The SOLIX's remaining advantages are its lighter 41.7-lb weight and its faster 10ms UPS switchover.
Which one is better for running power tools or a compressor fridge?
The Explorer 2000 Plus. Its 6,000W surge on a 3,000W continuous rating gives it more headroom for a hard motor start than the SOLIX's 4,000W surge on 2,400W continuous.
Which one is quieter?
Neither wins outright — both measure 30dB under load, one of the few specs here where they're genuinely identical rather than just close.
Which one is better as a UPS?
The SOLIX, on switchover speed — it transfers to battery in 10ms against the Explorer 2000 Plus's 20ms, a meaningful gap for protecting sensitive electronics through a blip.
Where to buy

Anker SOLIX C2000 Gen 2
$999.99
$999.99 list · direct from Anker

Jackery Explorer 2000 PlusPick
$899.00
$899.00 list · direct from Jackery
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.