Head-to-head test
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus vs Jackery HomePower 3000
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus vs Jackery HomePower 3000: the Explorer is no longer sold, and the HomePower holds 3,072Wh to its 2,043Wh with 600W more output at about two pounds less. Buy the HomePower 3000 unless you'll outgrow a battery that can't be expanded.
Full profiles: Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus → · Jackery HomePower 3000 →
Written by Gunner GustafsonUpdated
Whole-Home Backup Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
Spec deltas
Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 2000 Plus as a standalone unit, so this matchup has one box you can buy and one you can only measure against. The live one is the HomePower 3000, and it would have taken most of the spec sheet anyway: half again as much battery, 600W more continuous output, and a couple of pounds less to carry.
It isn't a clean sweep. The Explorer takes 1,400W of solar input to the HomePower's 1,000W, and it has an expansion port where the HomePower is sealed. Those two are exactly what an Explorer owner gives up by switching, and they're why this page still matters to the people who own one. Jackery names the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 as the Explorer's successor.
For a new buyer, the question has shrunk to one line. If a battery that can never grow covers your longest stretch off the grid, buy the HomePower 3000 and be done. If you already know it won't, neither box here is your answer.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
With the Explorer off sale, that growth path belongs to people who already own one. A shopper can't buy the base unit the port is attached to, which leaves the HomePower as the bigger battery on day one, and leaves exactly one person hurt by the retirement: the buyer whose loads run past 3,072Wh.
Explorer 2000 Plus: no longer sold; Jackery names the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 as its successorExplorer 2000 Plus: 2,043Wh, expandableHomePower 3000: 3,072Wh, no expansion port
Why it mattersIf you'd shortlisted the Explorer for its size, buy the HomePower; if you'd shortlisted it for its port, look at expandable stations instead.
Outages tend to arrive with the same storm that kills your solar harvest, so the energy already in the battery at dawn is the only energy you can count on. That reserve, not the first night, is what separates these two in a real outage.
8-Hour Blackout load: 1,645WhExplorer 2000 Plus: 1,736Wh usable, finishing with 91Wh leftHomePower 3000: 2,611Wh usable, finishing with 966Wh left
Why it mattersAnyone buying for outages that can run past one evening should treat the HomePower's reserve as the deciding spec.
solar input
If the reason to switch is running out of battery, the swap is sideways: an expansion battery on the Explorer you own adds capacity while keeping the faster solar input, and it keeps climbing past the point where the HomePower stops.
Explorer 2000 Plus: 1,400W solar input, expandable up to 12kWh on a single unitA2HomePower 3000: 1,000W solar input, sealed at 3,072WhHomePower 3000: 1,029Wh more capacity and 600W more continuous output than the Explorer
Why it mattersExplorer owners who need more energy should expand what they have; the HomePower is for buyers starting fresh.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: The HomePower wins four of the six loads outright, ties the CPAP night, and falls short alongside the Explorer only on van life.
Four of the six loads go to the HomePower, and none is close enough to argue about. The pattern is plain capacity: after the same flat 15% derate, it brings 2,611Wh to every job against the Explorer's 1,736Wh, and those 875Wh are roughly the difference between finishing a weekend and quitting on Saturday night. The CPAP night is the one row where size buys nothing, so the engine calls it a draw.
Van life is where both run out of road, and they fail for different reasons. The HomePower can't chase that daily draw because it's sealed. The Explorer has the port to chase it, and isn't on sale. For an owner, that row is the argument for expansion batteries. For a shopper, it's the argument for a bigger system from day one.
Runtime: Will It Power Your Gear?
Selected because: Usable energy per charge favors the HomePower, but solar refill favors the Explorer's 1,400W input over the HomePower's 1,000W.
continuous output
The HomePower holds half again as much, but it drinks sun slower. Its solar input tops out at 1,000W against the Explorer's 1,400W, so a full refill at rated input takes about 3 hours (3,072Wh divided by 1,000W) where the Explorer needs about 1.5 (2,043Wh divided by 1,400W). Real panels rarely deliver their rating, which stretches both, but the ratio holds. It's the bigger tank on the narrower pipe.
For a grid-tied backup buyer that barely registers, because the wall does the refilling and the extra capacity carries the night. It registers loudly for an Explorer owner running off panels: switching gives up 400W of input, and on a short winter day that's the difference between a full battery at sundown and a partial one.
Growth Path
Selected because: Expansion was the Explorer's structural edge; with the Explorer no longer sold, it now matters only to existing owners, and the HomePower is sealed at 3,072Wh.
solar input
Expansion was always the Explorer's argument, and a big one: up to 12kWh on a single unit and 24kWh across a paired setA2. The HomePower answers with nothing. It's a sealed box, and 3,072Wh is its ceiling for life. On a live comparison, that would be the whole debate for anyone with growing loads.
Retirement settles it differently. An expansion port is only worth something if you can buy the station it's attached to, so for a shopper the Explorer's growth path belongs to a unit that isn't on sale. It's still real for owners, who can keep building on what they have. Everyone else gets a simpler rule: buy the HomePower at the size that covers you today, or, if today's need already brushes its ceiling, buy something that can grow.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: The HomePower stores 1,029Wh more and still weighs about two pounds less, though neither is a light carry.
weight
The HomePower carries 1,029Wh more and still weighs about two pounds less, 59.5 lbs to the Explorer's 61.5. Divide it out and it stores roughly 52Wh per pound against the Explorer's 33, which reviewers credit to its cell-to-body constructionB1.
Don't mistake that for a different lift. Reviewers call the HomePower a one-person carry and the Explorer a two-person job on stairsB1A3, but two pounds can't hold up that distinction; it's framing. Both are a bent-knees, two-hands haul. The Explorer answers with wheels, a handle and an IP65 shellA3A5, more use on a gravel site than in a hallway, while the HomePower's 16.4-inch width slides onto shelves bulkier stations won't fitB1.
Strengths & trade-offs
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Strengths
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-600W) limits appliance compatibility.
Jackery HomePower 3000
Strengths
- +Lighter by 2 lb
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
HomePower 3000
The HomePower 3000 covers the weekend with 511Wh to spare. The Explorer 2000 Plus runs 364Wh short, about 83% of the way through. Only one of them makes it to Sunday, and it's also the only one still on sale.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
HomePower 3000
Both get through the night, but the Explorer arrives with 91Wh left and the HomePower with 966Wh, more than half of a second night. Outages and cloudy skies tend to travel together, so the reserve already in the battery is the one you can count on.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
A CPAP is about 40W for eight hours, so both of these cover the night several times over — capacity isn't the question here. Both happen to list 30dB — the same published figure twice, not a measured tie — so there is nothing in the noise column to separate them either. Only the HomePower 3000 is still sold, so a new purchase here is just the HomePower 3000; the Explorer 2000 Plus is a used-market question.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
HomePower 3000
The HomePower 3000 clears the workday at 35% used, banking 1,701Wh — late work, extra calls, or a second laptop charge without arithmetic. The Explorer 2000 Plus at 52% also finishes, with 826Wh of slack for the unplanned.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
HomePower 3000
Both handle game day; the HomePower 3000 keeps more in reserve (26% used vs 39%). Tailgating is a light load, though, so the number you'll feel is weight: 59.5 lbs for the HomePower 3000 against 61.5 lbs for the Explorer 2000 Plus, from the trunk to the setup spot.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither covers a 4,685Wh day. The HomePower gets 56% of the way and can't go further, because it's sealed. The Explorer gets 37% and is no longer sold, so its expansion port helps only people who already own one. A daily load this size wants a larger system from the start.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: HomePower 3000 runs 12.7h vs 8.5h.
$1,399 list · direct from Jackery
Planning for more than this? Describe your whole setup and get it sized →
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–174.1hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–34.8hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–2.6h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
October 11, 2026
Verdict: the HomePower 3000
Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 2000 Plus, so the HomePower 3000 is the only unit here you can buy new, and it earns the pick on the sheet anyway: 3,072Wh to 2,043Wh, 3,600W of continuous output to 3,000, a 7,200W surge ceiling to 6,000, and about two pounds less to lift. The Explorer kept two genuine edges, 1,400W of solar input to the HomePower's 1,000W and an expansion port the sealed HomePower lacks. Neither changes the call for a new buyer whose needs fit inside 3,072Wh. If yours won't, skip both and shop expandable stations, checking whether Jackery's named successor, the HomePower 2000 Plus v2, fits that bill.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of October 11, 2026. The links below open Jackery's current price.
$1,349.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 28 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Written by Gunner Gustafson, Whole-Home Backup Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated October 11, 2026
Black Friday · 26 days out
Price to beat:HomePower 3000 $1,199
The lowest we have recorded. A Black Friday price above it is a sale this unit has already had.
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, Explorer 2000 Plus rates 4.6/5 (74th percentile of 28 Large-class units), and HomePower 3000 rates 4.6/5 (78th percentile of 28 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
61.5 lbs, and the Live Unit Isn't Much Lighter
The flag lands on the Explorer at 61.5 lbs, and it's fair: that's a bent-knees, two-hands lift out of any trunk. Don't read the HomePower as the easy alternative, though. At 59.5 lbs it's barely two pounds lighter, so plan the same carry for either. The pounds don't separate these two; what they hold does.
The Catch on Our Pick: It Can't Grow
The HomePower 3000 is sealed. Whatever 3,072Wh covers on the day you buy it is what it covers for life, and the only way up is a second station. In a live matchup the Explorer's expansion port would be the answer, but the Explorer isn't sold new, so for a shopper that door is closed. If your loads are headed up, treat this as a reason to shop expandable stations, not a reason to settle.
Same Term on Paper, So Register Early
Both carry up to 5 years of cover, and on a Jackery that figure is conditional: 3 years as standard, plus 2 more once you register the unit with Jackery. Register the day it arrives. With identical terms, warranty can't separate these two. The one place it can bite is the Explorer: a leftover or refurbished unit bought now may not come with the full term, so ask the seller what actually applies before you count on five years.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the HomePower 3000.
Check HomePower 3000 price →Ownership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The Explorer 2000 Plus is no longer sold, so there is no price to work its cost per kWh from, and this comparison doesn't quote one. On what you can actually buy today, the HomePower 3000 works out at $0.11/kWh over its rated life. If you already own the Explorer 2000 Plus, the hardware comparison still holds: over its rated life the Explorer 2000 Plus delivers about 8,171 kWh and the HomePower 3000 about 12,288 kWh. One thing to know reading the table: both carry the same 4,000-cycle rating, so the lifetime rows are sticker price and capacity in disguise — the wear horizon is identical and decides nothing here.
Growth path
Explorer 2000 Plus
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,043Wh.
Accepts up to 1,400W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
HomePower 3000
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 3,072Wh — a sealed, complete system rather than a starting point. There's no expansion port, so that figure is the ceiling: check it against your longest unplugged stretch before you buy.
Accepts up to 1,000W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Growth only counts if you can still buy in, and the Explorer 2000 Plus is no longer sold (Jackery points owners to the HomePower 2000 Plus v2). That leaves the HomePower 3000: it is sealed at 3,072Wh, so buy the size that covers you now. The Explorer 2000 Plus's expandability still matters if you already own one, but it isn't a reason to pick it over the HomePower 3000.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Our research found strong review coverage of the Explorer 2000 Plus while it was on sale, and that coverage still describes the hardware owners have todayA0. Reviewers call it dependable, easy to use and relatively quiet even under a 3,000W load, happy to run anything from a CPAP machine to an electric grillA1. Its identity is scale: up to 12kWh on one unit, and a paired setup reaching 6,000W of output and as much as 24kWhA2, all on a tank-like IP65 build with two MPPT solar inputsA5.
The caveats are weight and software. At around 61 to 62 lbs it wants two people on stairs, though the wheels and handle earn their keep on smooth groundA3. The app covers the essentials, with cycle counts and efficiency graphs a data nerd will enjoy, but reviewers say it still needs polish next to rivalsA4.
“Reviewers describe it as dependable, easy to use, and relatively quiet even under a 3000W load, with universal compatibility for powering everything from CPAP machines to electric grills.”
Sources
outdoorgearlab.com · thesolarpit.com · jackery.com · voltagebasics.com · storagereview.com · thesolarlab.com · tipselite3s.com
Jackery HomePower 3000
Coverage of the HomePower 3000 comes from reviewers rather than long-term owner logsB0, and it centers on how much battery fits in the box. It's billed as the lightest and smallest 3kWh station going, carried by one person at around 60 lbs and narrow enough at 16.4 inches to fit spaces that reject rivalsB1. On backup duty, testers kept a standard refrigerator running for nearly two days and a 55-inch TV for around 30 hours, with a grid-to-battery switchover measured under 20 millisecondsB4.
The reliability note is a brand-level one: Jackery holds the lowest rate of reported failures and warranty claims among the major brands in owner communitiesB2. That speaks to the maker rather than this exact model, but it's the right kind of record for a box that sits in a closet waiting for the grid to fail.
“Described as the world's lightest and smallest 3kWh power station thanks to an advanced cell-to-body (CTB) design — one person can carry it at around 60 lbs, and its compact 16.4-inch width fits spaces that reject rivals.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · jackery.com · poweredthrough.com · thesolarlab.com · poweraic.com · tipselite3s.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Standout expandability (up to 24kWh dual), a rugged IP65 build with wheels, and dependable quiet operation are the praise; the heavy weight and an app that needs polish are the caveats. [Explorer 2000 Plus · 3 entries]
- Standout compactness and light weight for a 3kWh unit, Jackery's low failure/warranty-claim record, and dependable LFP home-backup performance are the praise. [HomePower 3000 · 3 entries]
- A1
“Reviewers describe it as dependable, easy to use, and relatively quiet even under a 3000W load, with universal compatibility for powering everything from CPAP machines to electric grills.”
outdoorgearlab.com / thesolarpit.com — Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Massive expandability — each unit's battery expands up to 12kWh, and pairing two units gives 6000W output and up to 24kWh total, ideal for RVs, home backup, or serious off-grid setups.”
jackery.com / thesolarpit.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“Not light at around 61-62 lbs — included wheels and a handle help on smooth surfaces, but it still demands a two-person lift for stairs.”
outdoorgearlab.com / voltagebasics.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [mixed]
- A4
“The app nails the essentials with pro-level insights like cycle counts and efficiency graphs, but it lacks some of the bells and whistles of rivals and still needs polishing.”
storagereview.com / thesolarlab.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [mixed]
- A5
“Strong solar with two MPPT inputs (up to ~1,200-1,400W), plus a tank-like build with IP65 dust and water resistance on key ports.”
storagereview.com / tipselite3s.com — Explorer 2000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“Described as the world's lightest and smallest 3kWh power station thanks to an advanced cell-to-body (CTB) design — one person can carry it at around 60 lbs, and its compact 16.4-inch width fits spaces that reject rivals.”
backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com — HomePower 3000 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Jackery maintains the lowest rate of reported failures and warranty claims among the major brands in owner communities.”
poweredthrough.com / backuppowerhub.com — Jackery reliability · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Solid home backup — kept a standard refrigerator running for nearly two days and a 55-inch TV for around 30 hours, with a grid-to-battery UPS switchover measured under 20 milliseconds.”
backuppowerhub.com / tipselite3s.com — HomePower 3000 review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled October 11, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the Explorer 2000 Plus if you…
- →You already own an Explorer 2000 Plus and it covers your loads. Nothing on this page is a reason to replace it; the HomePower's extra capacity would cost you 400W of solar input and an expansion port you already have.
- →You own one and keep running dry. Grow the station you have through its expansion port, which reaches up to 12kWh on a single unitA2, rather than buying a sealed box that tops out at 3,072Wh.
Buy the HomePower 3000 if you…
- →You'd shortlisted the Explorer for its size, not its port, and found it gone. The HomePower holds 1,029Wh more and starts bigger loads on its 7,200W surge, so the retirement costs you nothing.
- →You're buying for blackouts. The HomePower ends an 8-hour outage with more than half of a second night still in the battery, its switchover is rated at 20ms or less, and testers kept a standard fridge running for nearly two days on oneB4.
- →You camp for the weekend and refuse to ration on Saturday night. The HomePower clears a 2,100Wh weekend with 511Wh left, the trip the Explorer falls short on.
If neither fits
Close this tab if you plan to grow past a sealed 3,072Wh: the HomePower can't follow you and the Explorer can't be bought new, so shop expandable stations and check whether Jackery's successor, the HomePower 2000 Plus v2, fits. The same goes for a van-life daily draw of 4,685Wh, which leaves even the HomePower 2,074Wh short. And if all you're backing up is a CPAP, 320Wh a night is 12% of the HomePower's usable charge; a much smaller station does that job and is easier to carry to the bedroom.
The Bottom Line
The Explorer 2000 Plus has left Jackery's range, and the HomePower 3000 is the better box on the sheet regardless: half again as much usable energy, more continuous output and surge, and slightly less weight. Its two concessions are real, a slower solar input and a battery that can never grow, and they make up the whole case against it.
So if a sealed battery covers your longest night without the grid, stop shopping and buy the HomePower 3000. If it won't, that's not a reason to hunt down a leftover Explorer. It's a reason to shop for an expandable station, and to check whether Jackery's named successor, the HomePower 2000 Plus v2, fits that bill.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus discontinued?
Yes. Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 2000 Plus as a standalone unit, and it names the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 as the successor in that line. The Explorer's specs still hold for anyone who owns one, but a new purchase from this pair means the HomePower 3000.
Is the HomePower 3000 better than the Explorer 2000 Plus?
On most of the sheet, yes: 3,072Wh to 2,043Wh, 3,600W of continuous output to 3,000, a 7,200W surge to 6,000, and about two pounds lighter. The Explorer is ahead in two places, 1,400W of solar input to 1,000W and an expansion port the HomePower doesn't have. If you need neither, the HomePower is the stronger box.
Can you add batteries to the Jackery HomePower 3000?
No. It's sealed at 3,072Wh, so that's the most it will ever hold, and outgrowing it means buying a second station. If you expect your loads to climb, shop for an expandable unit instead.
Will the HomePower 3000 keep a fridge running in a power outage?
Yes, with room to spare. In testing it kept a standard refrigerator running for nearly two days, with a grid-to-battery switchover measured under 20 milliseconds. Its rated switchover is 20ms or less, and on our 8-hour blackout load it finishes with 966Wh still in the battery.
I own an Explorer 2000 Plus. Should I switch to the HomePower 3000?
Not as a straight swap. You'd gain 1,029Wh, 600W of continuous output and two pounds off the carry, and give up 400W of solar input plus the expansion port. If you're running out of capacity, a battery added to the Explorer you already own grows it past anything the sealed HomePower can reach.
Where to buy
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
No longer sold
Jackery HomePower 3000Pick
$1,349.00
$1,349.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 28 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.