Head-to-head test
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 vs BLUETTI Apex 300
Real-world runtimes, scenario verdicts, and ownership costs compared — which wins for your use case.
Full profiles: Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 → · BLUETTI Apex 300 →
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
$529.99 · direct from Anker
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
$1,499.00 · direct from BLUETTI
down from $1,699 · 12% below usual
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Spec deltas
The Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 (1,024Wh) and BLUETTI Apex 300 (2,765Wh) sit in different weight classes. The real question: do your power needs justify the larger unit, or would you be overpaying for capacity that sits unused? The Apex 300 has a slight edge, but the margin is close enough that your use case should break the tie.
What the spec gap means in practice: the Apex 300's 3,840W inverter has the headroom for a window AC, a full-size fridge, and power tools. The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's 2,000W inverter still runs most single appliances; the Apex 300's real edge is surge headroom for the biggest motor starts and stacking several heavy loads at once. On stamina, the Apex 300 keeps a fridge alive for roughly 16 hours vs the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's 6 hours. The cost? Portability. At 83.8 lbs, the Apex 300 is heavy enough to make you think twice about moving it. The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 at 24.9 lbs is something one person can actually carry.
Pick the Apex 300 if your primary use is weekend camping or 8-hour blackout. Go with the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 if you primarily need it for cpap overnight. Most buyers stop at the sticker price and miss this: over a full lifespan the Apex 300 works out to about $0.1/kWh against the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's $0.13, a gap that compounds in the Apex 300's favor the more you cycle it. Keep scrolling for the full breakdown. The scenario verdicts below hold a few surprises.
Bench Notes
What each unit does well, where it falls short, and the trade-offs that matter.
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2
The 2,000W inverter handles most daily devices like laptops, blenders, and TVs, but will struggle with heating elements that require over 1500W. At only 24.9 lbs, it is exceptionally portable. You can easily carry it one-handed to a campsite or tailgating party. A standout feature is the value proposition: at roughly $0.52 per watt-hour, it's one of the most cost-effective options on the market.
Strengths
- +Costs $1,169 less
- +Lighter by 58.9 lb
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-1,840W) limits appliance compatibility.
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 4,000 charge cycles vs the Apex 300's 6,000, so it wears out sooner.
BLUETTI Apex 300
With a massive 3,840W output (and 7,680W surge), the Apex 300 can run high-wattage appliances like space heaters, hair dryers, and electric grills without tripping. Weighing in at 83.8 lbs, this is not a unit you want to carry far. It's best suited as a stationary backup or RV companion.
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 6,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$1,169) than the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2.
- –Significantly heavier (+58.9 lbs), making it harder to move.
- –Very heavy unit that may be difficult for one person to lift.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Apex 300
The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 doesn't finish — 870Wh usable against the 2,100Wh this needs leaves it 1,230Wh short, about 41% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 250Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Apex 300
The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 doesn't finish — 870Wh usable against the 1,645Wh this needs leaves it 775Wh short, about 53% of the scenario covered. The Apex 300 covers it with 705Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
SOLIX C1000 Gen 2
A CPAP is about 40W for eight hours, so both of these cover the night several times over — capacity isn't the question here, and the percentages are a formality. What matters is the box next to your pillow, and the only published difference is a rating: the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is rated 35dB against the Apex 300's 45dB. Each is the maker's own published rating, and the makers do not measure the same way, some quoting a best case and some a figure under load, so neither number describes a 40W draw and the two are not really comparable. Treat them as a reason to look for hands-on reports before either one goes next to a bed, not as a difference you can count on hearing.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Apex 300
The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 comes up just short — it needs 910Wh and has 870Wh usable, a 40Wh gap (its nameplate 1,024Wh actually clears this — the flat 15% conversion allowance is what tips it under). Trim that much — one small appliance's worth across the day — and it finishes. The Apex 300 covers it outright with 1,440Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Apex 300
Both handle game day; the Apex 300 keeps more in reserve (29% used vs 77%). Tailgating is a light load, though, so the number you'll feel is weight: 24.9 lbs for the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 against 83.8 lbs for the Apex 300, from the trunk to the setup spot.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 comes up 3,815Wh short (about 19% covered), the Apex 300 2,335Wh (50%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Apex 300 runs 11.5h vs 4.2h.
$1,699 list · direct from BLUETTI
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–156.7hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–31.3hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–2.4h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 10, 2026
Verdict: the Apex 300, on Power Score margin
These two units are closely matched on individual specs, but our Power Score analysis gives the Apex 300 the edge with a composite score of 4,796 vs 3,235.
Today the Apex 300 is $1,499, $200 under its typical $1,699. The verdict weighs typical prices, not today's. Prices checked 1 day ago.
Overall score margin: 3,235 vs 4,796 (−48.3%)
List prices as of July 10, 2026. The links below open Anker's and BLUETTI's current prices.
$1,499.00 · direct from BLUETTI
down from $1,699 · 12% below usual
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 price$529.99 list
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 10, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): CPAP, Tailgating, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 rates 4.9/5 (96th percentile of 27 Everyday-class units), and Apex 300 rates 5.0/5 (99th percentile of 26 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Apex 300: 83.8 lbs Is a Commitment
At 83.8 lbs, this is manageable but not fun to move. That's heavier than a large checked suitcase. How much it costs you depends on whether it rolls — wheels and a telescoping handle change the job completely at this weight, and our spec record doesn't track them, so look at the product photos before you plan on carrying it from the car.
Apex 300: 45dB Published
45dB is about as loud as a running refrigerator. The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is rated 35dB — lower, but published by a different maker measuring its own way, so the two figures are not a like-for-like gap. For most people, fan noise around 45dB and up is where sleep starts to suffer.
Surge Power: Inverter Quality Indicator
The Apex 300 has a 2× surge-to-continuous ratio vs the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's 1.5×, and the higher absolute ceiling with it — 7,680W against 3,000W. At 2× it clears the 2× rule of thumb for absorbing motor startups — fridges, AC compressors and power tools briefly draw 2-3× their rated wattage. What decides whether a given motor starts is the ceiling, not the ratio: the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 still surges to 3,000W, so check the startup draw of the heaviest thing you plan to run against that figure rather than assuming it trips.
Warranty: No Difference
Both units carry the same 5-year warranty, so coverage isn't a tiebreaker here. The Apex 300's figure is a maximum rather than a guarantee — it depends on buying direct from BLUETTI or registering the unit, since reseller purchases carry a shorter term. Worth saying because the per-dollar framing can suggest otherwise: the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 works out at 9.4 years of cover per $1,000 spent against the Apex 300's 2.9, but that spread is the price gap, not the terms.
Battery Lifespan in Real Years
The Apex 300 is rated for 6,000 cycles vs 4,000. In real life: at daily use, that's 16.4 vs 11 years. At weekend use (twice a week), it's 58 vs 38 years. One caution reading years across different sizes: a cycle is 2,765Wh on the Apex 300 and 1,024Wh on the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2, so count lifetime energy — roughly 16,589 kWh against 4,096 kWh over the rated life. After hitting the cycle limit, the battery doesn't die — it drops to ~80% of original capacity, which is still very usable.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Apex 300.
Check Apex 300 price →or check the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is cheaper to buy, but the Apex 300 is cheaper to own. At $0.1/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.13/kWh, the Apex 300's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years.
Brand trust
Anker
Ecosystem
7-8 SOLIX portable power stations across C-series (compact) and F-series (flagship), plus the X1 home energy system
Support
US-based support. Historically known for incredible no-hassle replacements, but recent reports describe AI-driven support agents giving generic responses and complex return logistics for heavy units (hazmat shipping). The Anker brand reputation is still strong, but SOLIX-specific support quality is trending down.
Community
Moderate — active Reddit (r/Anker, r/AnkerSOLIXCommunity) and growing. Benefits from Anker's massive consumer electronics brand awareness.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS (~1,100 ratings) · 4.3/5 Android
Unique strength
Parent brand trust from Anker's consumer electronics dominance. InfiniPower technology for long cycle life. Strong $/Wh value in the mid-size and larger units — the S2000, F2600 and C1000 are among the better buys per watt-hour in the catalog.
Worth knowing
Support quality appears to be declining from its historically excellent level. Firmware updates have removed features without warning. Expansion ecosystem is smaller than EcoFlow's.
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship portable (Apex 300, 2764.8Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
Among the best capacity-to-price ratios available — several Elite and Apex units are the lowest $/Wh in the catalog. Widest product diversity including industry-firsts like sodium-ion cold-weather units and dual solar+alternator vehicle hubs. LFP across the rest of the range, though rated cycle life spans 2,500 (EB3A) to 6,000, and it varies WITHIN the Elite range rather than tracking it — the Elite 300 and Elite 200 V2 are rated 6,000 while the Elite 30 V2, Elite 10 Mini, Elite 320 and Elite 400 are rated 3,000+ and the Elite 100 V2 4,000+, so check the specific model. Dual-voltage (120V/240V) in flagships.
Worth knowing
Customer support inconsistency is the #1 risk factor. Older/discontinued units may become unrepairable — no spare parts policy for some models. Some reports of erratic communication from support agents.
Analyst note
Anker and BLUETTI are close competitors. Both have established support channels and growing ecosystems. Compare their specific warranty terms and community size for your peace of mind.
Growth path
SOLIX C1000 Gen 2
EXPANDABLESupports Anker expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 1,024Wh.
Accepts up to 600W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Generous port selection supports complex multi-device setups.
Expansion batteries are Anker-specific. You're investing in the Anker ecosystem.
Apex 300
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,765Wh.
Accepts up to 2,400W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Generous port selection supports complex multi-device setups.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, but the Apex 300's higher solar ceiling (2,400W vs 600W) gives it the stronger off-grid growth path — more panels can feed a bigger bank as it grows.
What Owners Actually Report
Drawn from 37 comments on independent review channels — not from retailer reviews, which skew to the first week of ownership. Each line is our summary of one commenter's claim, linked to the original. We record what they said, including where it contradicts the spec sheet.
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2
22 claims from 14 comments · 18 from owners · 6 with figures
- Price & value
- 4 · 0% negative
- Runtime
- 3 · 15% negative
- UPS switchover
- 2 · 0% negative
- Inverter & surge
- 1 · 0% negative
- Solar input
- 1 · 0% negative
What owners complain about
Gen 2 loses the gen 1's ability to add an expansion battery.
Expandability23 agreedsource →
Same app failure as his other brands: paired devices go missing on later launches.
App & firmwareowner2 agreedsource →
Can only pull 100W from the C1000 Gen 2's 12V ports and cannot confirm how XT60i sensing works.
Otherownersource →
What owners praise
Two units keep his gas furnace, three fridge/freezers and network alive for 5+ hours.
Runtimemeasuredowner15 agreedsource →
Anker 1000 gen 2's edge is a 2000W inverter, also at 25 pounds.
Inverter & surgemeasuredowner8 agreedsource →
Got the C1000 gen 2 on sale for $379 plus a $219 200W panel.
Price & valuemeasuredowner6 agreedsource →
BLUETTI Apex 300
36 claims from 23 comments · 18 from owners · 6 with figures
- Price & value
- 10 · 8% negative
- Solar input
- 6 · 53% negative
- Inverter & surge
- 2 · 0% negative
- Build quality
- 2 · 0% negative
- Runtime
- 2 · 100% negative
What owners complain about
TV, router, Tablo and Firestick drain it from 100% in 7-9 hours; runtime figures are lies.
Runtimemeasuredownersource →
Dropping to a 60V PV max is a deal killer versus the 150V per string they run on the AC300.
Solar inputowner1 agreedsource →
App is portrait-only.
App & firmwareownersource →
What owners praise
Two paralleled units give 7,680W and run dryer, 2-ton AC or oven plus fridges and sump pump.
Inverter & surgemeasuredowner5 agreedsource →
$2,600 for two units plus $659 for the Hub A1 was worth the extra over the Anker.
Price & valuemeasuredowner5 agreedsource →
Three Apex 300s with a Hub A1 give him 18kW solar input and 12kW output.
Solar inputmeasuredownerafter 1 months10 agreedsource →
Claims are weighted by how specific they are, whether the commenter owns the unit, and how many readers agreed. Comments that mention a product under a rival's review count for more, because the commenter had no reason to be there. This is what buyers report, not our test results — for measurements we ran ourselves, see the methodology.
The Bottom Line
The full picture comes down to this. The Apex 300 edges ahead on our overall analysis, but the margin is narrow enough that your specific use case should drive the decision. Review the scenario verdicts above — if the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 wins in the scenarios that match your life, it's the right choice regardless of aggregate scores.
If neither the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 nor the Apex 300 feels like the right fit, your power needs probably sit outside what these two target. Use our comparison tool above to explore alternatives that better match your specific wattage and runtime requirements. Prices on portable power stations fluctuate frequently. Both Anker and BLUETTI discount regularly, so check the current price before committing. Prime Day and Black Friday pricing typically drops 20-30%.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Apex 300 worth $1,169 more than the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2?
The short answer: yes, if you'll actually use the extra capability. The Apex 300 costs $1,169 more, but that premium buys you 1,740.8Wh more battery capacity (that's 10 extra hours of running a mini-fridge); 1,840W higher AC output (opening the door to more demanding appliances); a longer-lasting battery rated for 6,000 cycles — that's 16 years at daily use; 1,800W faster solar charging for quicker off-grid recovery. On a cost-per-watt-hour basis, you're paying $0.61/Wh vs $0.52/Wh. Factor in cycle life and the math flips: the Apex 300 costs $0.10/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.13/kWh. The "expensive" unit is actually cheaper to own. For regular use, we'd pay the premium.
How does the 1,740.8Wh capacity difference actually affect daily use?
The Apex 300's 2,764.8Wh battery keeps a mini-fridge running for roughly 16 hours vs the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's 6 hours. Where it really matters: during an 8-hour blackout running your fridge, router, lights, AND charging your phone simultaneously (about 1,645Wh total), the Apex 300 handles it while the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 runs dry. What specs don't mention: runtime drops 20-30% in cold weather (below 32°F/0°C) as battery chemistry slows down. The Apex 300's extra capacity provides a critical cold-weather buffer. For occasional phone and laptop charging, both are overkill. This gap only matters for sustained, multi-appliance use.
Can I actually carry the Apex 300, or is the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 the only portable option?
At 24.9 lbs, the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is manageable for one person over short distances: parking lot to campsite, trunk to tailgate. The Apex 300 at 83.8 lbs? You'll want a buddy, a wagon, or wheels. For reference, 83.8 lbs is about the weight of a bag of concrete. If your use case involves any carrying, the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 wins decisively.
How fast can each unit recharge from solar panels in real conditions?
On paper, the Apex 300 accepts 2,400W vs the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2's 600W of solar input. What the spec sheet won't tell you: solar panels typically deliver only 60-80% of their rated output due to panel angle, cloud cover, and temperature. In realistic conditions, expect full recharge in about 1.6 hours for the Apex 300 and 2.4 hours for the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2. That gap widens on cloudy days, when the Apex 300's higher input ceiling captures more of whatever sunlight is available. One more thing: summer gives you ~7 productive solar hours per day. Winter drops to ~4. If solar is your primary recharge method, the Apex 300's advantage is substantial.
"6,000 vs 4,000 cycles" — what does that actually mean for me?
In real years: the Apex 300 (6,000 cycles) lasts 16.4 years at daily use, 58 years at weekend use (twice a week), or 250 years at twice-monthly camping trips. The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 (4,000 cycles): 11.0 years daily, 38 years weekends, or 167 years twice-monthly. What most people miss: hitting the cycle limit doesn't kill your battery. Capacity drops to about 80%. Your 2,764.8Wh unit becomes a ~2,212Wh unit. Still very usable. For weekend users, both batteries will outlast the warranty by years.
Is Anker or BLUETTI more reliable for long-term ownership?
Both brands have strengths and trade-offs. Anker: 5-year warranty standard on portable stations, 10-year on home energy systems. Historically very reliable, though some recent firmware updates have altered product functionality without notice or rollback option. BLUETTI: 2-6 years depending on model (up to 10 years on home backup systems). Response times vary significantly. Some reports of units being deemed unrepairable with no parts available for older models. One piece of advice from the power station community: regardless of brand, buy from Costco or Amazon. Their return policies provide a safety net that manufacturer warranties alone can't match, especially for a product you'll rely on in emergencies. Both brands use LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries in their current lineup, the most proven chemistry for longevity and safety.
Bottom line: should I buy the SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 or the Apex 300?
We'd pay the premium for the Apex 300. Yes, it costs more. The capability jump is real: you're stepping into a tier that handles appliances the base model can't start. The SOLIX C1000 Gen 2 is still solid if budget is the priority, but the Apex 300 will leave you less likely to wish you'd "gone bigger" six months from now. That regret costs more than the price difference.
Where to buy
Anker SOLIX C1000 Gen 2
$529.99
$529.99 · direct from Anker
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
BLUETTI Apex 300Pick
$1,499.00
$1,499.00 · direct from BLUETTI
down from $1,699 · 12% below usual
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.