Head-to-head test
Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2 vs Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus
Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2 vs Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus: the same 6,000-cycle rating and expansion path on both, but the 3600 Plus holds 3,584Wh against 2,048Wh and takes 1,000W of solar against 800W. Buy the 3600 Plus if your heaviest load is a camping weekend, which needs 121% of the smaller unit's usable capacity.
Full profiles: Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2 β Β· Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus β
Written by Gunner GustafsonUpdated
Whole-Home Backup Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
Spec deltas
Jackery didn't build two different power stations here. It built one battery platform stretched two ways: the HomePower 3600 Plus carries 1,536Wh more usable capacity than the 2000 Plus v2, for $830 more money, and otherwise the two share a brand, a 6,000-cycle rating, and the same expansion-battery ecosystem.
For most of the loads on this page, that extra capacity earns its keep. The 2000 Plus v2 can't finish a weekend of camping appliances, and it clears an 8-hour blackout with almost nothing left in reserve. The 3600 Plus clears both with real margin to spare, which is what $830 ought to buy.
Not every load cares, though. A CPAP burns through a sliver of either battery, and a remote workday leaves both with plenty to spare. Buy the bigger unit for the scenarios that actually need it, not because the bigger number feels safer.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first β the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
77.2 lbs is a two-person, watch-your-back lift out of a trunk or up a step. 41.45 lbs is still something one person carries without thinking about it. Since the two units are otherwise the same battery platform, the weight jump is the most physical, daily-life expression of what that extra capacity actually costs.
HomePower 2000 Plus v2 weighs 41.45 lbs; HomePower 3600 Plus weighs 77.2 lbsThe 3600 Plus carries 1,536Wh more usable capacityBoth share the same 6,000-cycle rating and 5-year warranty
Why it mattersAnyone moving the unit often β in and out of a garage, up porch stairs, between a house and a shed β should weigh the lift as seriously as the runtime before paying $830 more for it.
Typical price
That $0.08-vs-$0.09 gap only pays off if you'll genuinely put a decade-plus of hard, repeated cycling on the unit. Priced against just the 5-year warranty both units share, the math flips: the 2000 Plus v2 costs $210 a year to own, the 3600 Plus $324, because that number is really just the sticker price divided by five.
2000 Plus v2 costs $1,069 at $0.09 per lifetime kWh; 3600 Plus costs $1,899 at $0.08 per lifetime kWhBoth are rated for 6,000 cyclesCost per warranty year is $210 for the 2000 Plus v2 versus $324 for the 3600 Plus
Why it mattersBuyers planning to run either unit hard for the long haul should trust the lifetime-kWh number and lean 3600 Plus. Buyers who mainly want five years of blackout insurance should budget off the warranty-year number and save the $830.
Below the Remote Workday's 910Wh, the 2000 Plus v2 has real capacity to spare (52% used). Above the Weekend Camping's 2,100Wh, it runs out of room entirely (121% needed). Buyers should map their own heaviest real load onto that range instead of assuming more capacity is always the safer buy.
Weekend Camping needs 2,100Wh; the 2000 Plus v2 would need 121% of its usable capacityCPAP Overnight needs 320Wh; both units use under a fifth of their capacity (18% and 11%)Remote Workday needs 910Wh, and the 2000 Plus v2 covers it using just 52% of its capacity
Why it mattersSomeone whose heaviest real load is a CPAP or a remote workday is paying $830 for headroom they'll never touch. Someone planning an appliance-heavy camping weekend is paying for the only one of the two that actually finishes the trip.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units β everything else is a tie.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: Six load-based scenarios show exactly where the capacity gap stops being decorative β camping fails p1 outright, CPAP makes the gap irrelevant.
Line these six scenarios up by size and a pattern falls out: the 2000 Plus v2's disadvantage shrinks every time the load gets smaller. It can't finish Weekend Camping at all. It clears the 8-Hour Blackout but lands with almost nothing left in the tank. By CPAP Overnight, both units are sipping under a fifth of what they carry, and the size gap between them stops mattering.
Van Life Daily breaks the pattern from the other direction: at 4,685Wh of continuous daily draw, neither unit gets there alone. The 3600 Plus needs 154% of its usable capacity and the 2000 Plus v2 needs 269%. That's a case for a second battery or serious solar input, not a reason to spend $830 more on the 3600 Plus instead of the 2000 Plus v2. Everywhere else on this page, the right unit is whichever one sits closest to your actual load.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: cheaperToOwn favors p2 per lifetime kWh, but p1 wins cost-per-warranty-year β the real crux of whether the $830 step-up pays off.
The 3600 Plus is the cheaper unit to run, not to buy: $0.08 per lifetime kWh against the 2000 Plus v2's $0.09. Both units share the same 6,000-cycle rating, so that gap exists purely because the 3600 Plus moves more energy across those cycles β 21,504 kWh of total lifetime throughput against 12,288 kWh. It isn't lasting longer; cycle for cycle, both last exactly as long.
Cost per warranty year tells the opposite story: $210 a year for the 2000 Plus v2 against $324 for the 3600 Plus, since that figure is just the purchase price divided by the same 5-year warranty both units carry. Daily use burns through either unit's cycle life in 16.4 years, so the lifetime-kWh number rewards buyers who'll genuinely put a decade-plus of hard use on the unit, while the warranty-year number is the honest one for buyers who just want to know what 5 years of coverage costs today.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Only three gotchas fire (weight, UPS, warranty) and each cuts a different direction β the honest trade-offs live here.
Only three considerations clear the bar for this pair, and they don't all point the same way. Weight is the one unambiguous case against the 3600 Plus: 77.2 lbs is a real, two-handed commitment to lift and move, against the 2000 Plus v2's 41.45 lbs.
UPS switchover actually favors the smaller unit: the 2000 Plus v2 switches to battery in under 10ms (line-interactive) against the 3600 Plus's under 20ms (standby). Both are fast enough for most home electronics, but for anything switchover-sensitive, paying more here buys a slower unit, not a faster one. Warranty length is identical at 5 years each; the only thing that differs is what those 5 years cost per unit.
Growth Path
Selected because: Both expand on the same battery ecosystem; p2's solar-input ceiling is the higher of the two, but only by 200W.
solar input
Both units expand on the same Jackery battery ecosystem, so neither locks you into its base capacity forever. The real difference is solar input, and it is narrower than the capacity gap: the 3600 Plus accepts up to 1,000W of panels against the 2000 Plus v2's 800W ceiling. Expand either one and that 200W of extra input won't keep the recharge window from stretching.
Strengths & trade-offs
Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2
Strengths
- +Costs $830 less
- +Lighter by 35.8 lb
Trade-offs
- βWeaker inverter (-1,200W) limits appliance compatibility.
Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- βSubstantially more expensive (+$830) than the HomePower 2000 Plus v2.
- βSignificantly heavier (+35.8 lbs), making it harder to move.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 Β· 2 nights Β· needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
HomePower 3600 Plus
This one's a real failure for the 2000 Plus v2, not just a thinner margin. The 2,100Wh load needs 121% of its usable capacity, so it runs out before the trip's appliances are done. The 3600 Plus covers the same weekend using 69% of its capacity, with genuine reserve left over.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β Phone Charger 15WΓ6h Β· LED Lights 40WΓ8h Β· Box Fan 75WΓ14h Β· CPAP Machine 40WΓ16h
SCN-02 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
HomePower 3600 Plus
The 2000 Plus v2 finishes this one; it doesn't fail. But at 94% of usable capacity there's almost no buffer left for anything running longer or harder than planned. The 3600 Plus uses just 54%, finishing with real margin instead of finishing on fumes.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β Fridge 150WΓ8h Β· Router + Modem 20WΓ8h Β· LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40WΓ6h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ3h
SCN-03 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption β the #1 medical use case
Either unit
Both units handle this comfortably: 18% of usable capacity for the 2000 Plus v2, 11% for the 3600 Plus. The extra capacity in the bigger unit is irrelevant here β this is the one scenario on this page where the cheaper, lighter unit is simply the correct buy.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β CPAP Machine 40WΓ8h
SCN-04 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
HomePower 3600 Plus
Not a failure for the 2000 Plus v2 β it clears the day using 52% of its usable capacity, with plenty left over. The 3600 Plus uses 30% and wins on paper, but the practical difference is how much reserve is left at day's end, not whether the day gets finished.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β Laptop 60WΓ8h Β· External Monitor 30WΓ8h Β· Router + Modem 20WΓ8h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ2h
SCN-05 Β· 4 hours Β· needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
HomePower 3600 Plus
Both units finish this load easily. The 2000 Plus v2 uses 38% of its usable capacity against the 3600 Plus's 22% β a real gap on paper, but not one that changes whether the party gets powered.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β Blender 400WΓ0.5h Β· LED TV (55") 80WΓ4h Β· Bluetooth Speaker 15WΓ4h Β· Phone Charger (Γ3) 45WΓ2h
SCN-06 Β· 24 hours Β· needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living β the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this alone. At 4,685Wh of continuous daily draw, the 2000 Plus v2 would need 269% of its usable capacity and the 3600 Plus needs 154% β both run out. This load calls for a second battery or a serious solar-charging setup, not a bigger single unit from this line.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOADΒ Β Mini-Fridge 150WΓ24h Β· Laptop 60WΓ4h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ3h Β· LED Lights 40WΓ5h Β· Fan 75WΓ8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh Γ 0.85) Γ· LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: HomePower 3600 Plus runs 14.9h vs 8.5h.
$1,899 list Β· direct from Jackery
Planning for more than this? Describe your whole setup and get it sizedΒ β
Modeled from the spec record β same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.ΒΉ
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0β203.1hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0β40.6hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0β3hΒΉ Runtime = (capacity Γ 0.85) Γ· appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads β see methodology.
Conclusion
July 28, 2026
Verdict: the HomePower 3600 Plus, on Power Score margin
The 3600 Plus wins because it's the only one of these two that clears every scenario on this page, including the two where the 2000 Plus v2 either can't finish (Weekend Camping, needing 121% of its usable capacity) or finishes with almost nothing left (8-Hour Blackout, at 94% used). It's also the cheaper unit per lifetime kWh, $0.08 against $0.09, once you account for the identical 6,000-cycle rating both units share. That win isn't universal: on Remote Workday and CPAP Overnight the 2000 Plus v2 clears its load with real margin (52% and 18% used) and costs $830 less to do it, so match the unit to your heaviest real load rather than to the bigger number on the box.
Today the HomePower 3600 Plus is $1,709, $190 under its typical $1,899. The verdict weighs typical prices, not today's. Prices checked 16 days ago.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 28, 2026. The links below open Jackery's current price.
$1,709.00 Β· direct from Jackery
down from $1,899 Β· 10% below usual
Last checked 16 days ago. Prices move β check before you buy.
or check the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 price$1,069.00 list
Written by Gunner Gustafson, Whole-Home Backup Tester Β· Station Arena Test Desk Β· Updated July 28, 2026
Black Friday Β· 38 days out
Prices to beat:HomePower 2000 Plus v2 $1,049HomePower 3600 Plus $1,619
The lowest we have recorded for each. A Black Friday price above it is a sale that unit has already had.
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): CPAP, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
α΅ Derived: price Γ· rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons β
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool βHow these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it β no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews β see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity Γ 0.85 inverter efficiency) Γ· device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page βClass ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews β no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5β . Here, HomePower 2000 Plus v2 rates 4.4/5 (64th percentile of 26 Large-class units), and HomePower 3600 Plus rates 4.0/5 (42nd percentile of 20 Home Backup-class units).
How the class ranking is computed βTest Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
77.2 lbs Is a Two-Person Lift; 41.45 Isn't
The step up costs 35.75 lbs, nearly the weight of an entire second 2000 Plus v2. If this unit needs to move often, not just sit once in a basement, that's as real a cost as the extra capacity is a benefit.
Same 5 Years, Different Math
Both units carry a 5-year warranty. Budgeting for just that window favors the 2000 Plus v2 ($210 a year vs $324). Budgeting for the unit's full 6,000-cycle working life favors the 3600 Plus ($0.08 per kWh vs $0.09).
Full record above β the Test Desk pick is the HomePower 3600 Plus.
Check HomePower 3600 Plus price βor check the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy β true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
β warranty ends Β· Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains β degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
Both units cost the same to own over their rated lives β $0.09/kWh each. Lifetime cost can't separate them, so decide on the sticker price and everything else. One thing to know reading the table: both carry the same 6,000-cycle rating, so the lifetime rows are sticker price and capacity in disguise β the wear horizon is identical and decides nothing here.
Growth path
HomePower 2000 Plus v2
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit β useful if your needs may climb past 2,048Wh.
Accepts up to 800W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
HomePower 3600 Plus
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit β useful if your needs may climb past 3,584Wh.
Accepts up to 1,000W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output β see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, so neither locks you out of growth β decide on capacity, price, and the rest, not the expansion checkbox.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews β every claim cited to its source below.
Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2
Field data here is thin: the 2000 Plus v2 launched only weeks before this comparison, and the only coverage found is launch-day framing, not a hands-on testA1A2. What exists leans entirely on weight and portability β one comparison calls it lighter than a 5-gallon water jug and lighter than a Honda-style gas generatorA1, another frames the weight cut from its predecessor as meaningful while admitting the unit is still a real lift for some peopleA2. Treat both as launch marketing rather than lived-in ownership; no fan-noise, app-behavior, or long-term durability reports exist yet for this exact model.
βAt 41.5 lb., the new model weighs less than a 5-gallon water cooler bottle β a Honda EU2000i portable generator (1800W rated/2200W peak, versus 2400W rated/3800W peak here) still weighs more at 47.4 lb. dry.β
Jackery HomePower 3600 Plus
Owners and reviewers point to two things repeatedly: an EV-grade LiFePO4 cell rated for 6,000 cycles, pegged at well over a decade of service lifeB1, and genuinely manageable mobility for a unit this size, thanks to built-in wheels and a pull handleB2. It also draws strong ratings, with reviewers calling out ease of use, quiet operation, and reliable performanceB4.
One account is the kind of real-world test this page is trying to predict: during a three-day regional blackout, an owner ran a fridge, a microwave, string lights, fans, and a CPAP machine for two straight days on a single chargeB3. That's a single data point, not a pattern, but it lines up with the scenario math above β the same load profile clears with real margin in our own numbers too.
βEV-grade LiFePO4 battery rated for 6,000 cycles, giving well over a decade of service life.β
Sources
jackery.com Β· batteryskills.com Β· poweraic.com Β· tipselite3s.com Β· greattips3s.com Β· powerelectrichub.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- The only public commentary found frames the unit's value primarily around weight/portability relative to its predecessor and to gas generators, rather than any lived-in usage detail. [HomePower 2000 Plus v2 Β· 2 entries]
- Light weight (with wheels), a 6,000-cycle EV-grade battery, quiet reliable operation, and strong owner ratings are the standout praise. [HomePower 3600 Plus Β· 3 entries]
- A1
βAt 41.5 lb., the new model weighs less than a 5-gallon water cooler bottle β a Honda EU2000i portable generator (1800W rated/2200W peak, versus 2400W rated/3800W peak here) still weighs more at 47.4 lb. dry.β
CleanTechnica β Jackery Launches Latest, Versatile HomePower Batteries (launch coverage, not a hands-on test) Β· 2026-06 Β· [positive]
- A2
βA ~21 lb., or 34%, weight reduction in the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 over its predecessor β that weight might still be a challenge for some people, but it is much easier to lift and move than many competing portable power sources.β
CleanTechnica β Jackery Launches Latest, Versatile HomePower Batteries (launch coverage, not a hands-on test) Β· 2026-06 Β· [positive]
- B1
βEV-grade LiFePO4 battery rated for 6,000 cycles, giving well over a decade of service life.β
jackery.com / batteryskills.com β HomePower 3600 Plus review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]
- B2
βAbout 77 lbs with built-in wheels and a pull handle for easy mobility β light and manageable for a 3.6kWh-class unit.β
jackery.com / poweraic.com β HomePower 3600 Plus review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]
- B3
βIn a three-day regional blackout, one owner ran a fridge, a microwave, string lights, fans, and a CPAP machine for two straight days on a single charge.β
tipselite3s.com / greattips3s.com β HomePower 3600 Plus owner review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]
- B4
βHolds a 4.5-out-of-5 rating on Amazon, with customers consistently praising ease of use, quiet operation, and reliable performance; expandable to a very large bank.β
batteryskills.com / powerelectrichub.com β HomePower 3600 Plus review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]
Research compiled July 28, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the HomePower 2000 Plus v2 if youβ¦
- βBuy the 2000 Plus v2 if your heaviest real load looks like CPAP Overnight or Remote Workday β both clear it with real margin (18% and 52% of usable capacity), and you save $830 and 35.75 lbs of lifting for headroom you were never going to use.
- βIt's also the better fit if the unit has to move often: one-person carries in and out of a garage, up a porch step, between rooms. 41.45 lbs is a genuinely different physical task than 77.2 lbs.
Buy the HomePower 3600 Plus if youβ¦
- βBuy the 3600 Plus if your loads look like Weekend Camping or an extended blackout. The 2000 Plus v2 can't finish the camping scenario at all, and it clears the 8-Hour Blackout with almost nothing left over; the 3600 Plus finishes both with real reserve (69% and 54% used).
- βIt's also the right pick if you plan to run this hard for a decade-plus or build toward a bigger solar-fed bank: it's cheaper per lifetime kWh ($0.08 vs $0.09), and its 1,000W solar ceiling takes 200W more panel than the 2000 Plus v2's 800W.
If neither fits
Skip both if your daily load looks like Van Life Daily's 4,685Wh: neither unit covers it alone (the 3600 Plus needs 154% of its usable capacity, the 2000 Plus v2 needs 269%). That's a second battery, a proper solar-charged system, or a different category entirely, not a bigger single box from this same line.
The Bottom Line
The 3600 Plus is the stronger default: it's the only one of these two that clears every scenario on this page, including the camping weekend the 2000 Plus v2 can't finish, and it does it at a lower cost per lifetime kWh ($0.08 vs $0.09) across the same 6,000-cycle rating.
That's worth $830 and 35.75 extra pounds to most buyers in this category. It isn't worth it to the ones whose heaviest real load looks like CPAP Overnight or Remote Workday, where the 2000 Plus v2 already finishes with real margin to spare. Match the unit to the load, not to the number on the box.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the HomePower 3600 Plus just a bigger battery, or a different product?
Mechanically it's the same platform: identical 6,000-cycle rating, identical 5-year warranty, and the same expansion-battery ecosystem. The real differences are capacity (2,048Wh vs 3,584Wh), continuous output (2,400W vs 3,600W), and price ($1,069 vs $1,899); everything else moves in lockstep with those three numbers.
Which one is cheaper to run long-term?
The 3600 Plus, at $0.08 per lifetime kWh against the 2000 Plus v2's $0.09 β both last the same 6,000 cycles, but the bigger unit moves more energy across them (21,504 kWh total versus 12,288 kWh). That gap only matters if you'll actually put a decade-plus of hard use on the unit; over just the 5-year warranty window, the 2000 Plus v2 is the cheaper commitment at $210 a year against $324.
Can the 2000 Plus v2 handle a weekend of camping?
Not on this page's numbers. Weekend Camping needs about 2,100Wh, and the 2000 Plus v2 would need 121% of its usable capacity to cover it, meaning it runs out before the trip's appliance load is done. The 3600 Plus covers the same weekend using 69% of its capacity, with real reserve left.
Does the extra weight of the 3600 Plus actually matter?
If you're moving it often, yes. 77.2 lbs against 41.45 lbs is the difference between a one-person carry and a two-person, watch-your-back lift. If it's going to sit in one place as a home battery, the weight is close to irrelevant and the capacity and solar-input ceiling matter more.
Related comparisons
Where to buy
Jackery HomePower 2000 Plus v2
$1,069.00
$1,069.00 Β· direct from Jackery
Last checked 16 days ago. Prices move β check before you buy.
Jackery HomePower 3600 PlusPick
$1,709.00
$1,709.00 Β· direct from Jackery
down from $1,899 Β· 10% below usual
Last checked 16 days ago. Prices move β check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.