Head-to-head test
Jackery Explorer 1500 Ultra vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2
Twice the price buys 896 more watt-hours and more than triple the output — and it's the smaller, cheaper-looking 600 v2 that actually costs more per watt-hour over its life.
Full profiles: Jackery Explorer 1500 Ultra → · Jackery Explorer 600 v2 →
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
$1,079.00 · direct from Jackery
down from $1,199 · 10% below usual
Last checked 3 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
$499.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 3 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Spec deltas
The Explorer 1500 Ultra belongs to a different Jackery sub-line than the 600 v2, not just a bigger battery in the same one. It launched sealed to an IP65 rating, with a titanium-alloy cooling structure built to shrug off dust, rain, and low-pressure water jetsA1, while the 600 v2 was designed around the opposite priority: being the lightest 600Wh-class station Jackery sellsB1. Two different jobs, wearing similar plastic.
At $999 versus $499, the Ultra costs almost exactly what you'd guess: twice as much. What you might not guess is that it's also the cheaper unit to own. Spread the price across each unit's rated cycle life and capacity, and the smaller, cheaper-looking 600 v2 turns out to cost more for every watt-hour it delivers, not less.
That reversal holds up everywhere else on the spec sheet: 896 more watt-hours of capacity, more than 3x the continuous output and surge headroom, and 4x the rated solar input. The 600 v2's one advantage is weight, 14.1 lbs against 38.6. Every other number here, including three of the six real-world scenarios below, favors the Ultra outright; the other three are scenarios neither unit is built to finish.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
rated cycles
Carry that through to cost per lifetime kilowatt-hour, price divided by total energy the unit will ever deliver across its rated cycles, and the Ultra lands at $0.16 against $0.26 for the 600 v2. The cheaper-looking box is the one charging more per watt-hour, not less.
Price: $999 (Explorer 1500 Ultra) vs $499 (Explorer 600 v2) — almost exactly doubleCapacity: 1,536Wh (p1) vs 640Wh (p2) — 896Wh more, a 2.4x ratio, plus 1,000 more rated cycles (4,000 vs 3,000)costPerWh spec: $0.65 (p1) vs $0.78 (p2)
Why it mattersAnyone deciding on sticker price alone is optimizing for the wrong number. Over the ownership period, the 600 v2 is the more expensive way to store a kilowatt-hour.
The Ultra clears both with room left, 70% and 51% of usable capacity, because it has the watt-hours to spend, not because it pushes harder per second. The differentiator here is tank size, not tap size.
Remote Workday needs about 910Wh: 70% of the Ultra's usable capacity, 167% of the 600 v2'sTailgate Party needs about 670Wh: 51% of the Ultra's usable capacity, 123% of the 600 v2's600 v2 rated continuous output: 500W
Why it mattersAnyone whose day away from an outlet runs long, a full workday, a full afternoon and evening tailgating, needs the Ultra's capacity specifically. The 600 v2 is sized for shorter draws, regardless of how modest the wattage is.
solar input
The bigger, heavier unit is also the faster-charging one once the sun is out. The 600 v2's smaller tank doesn't make up for its smaller pump.
Rated solar input: 800W (p1) vs 200W (p2), a 4x gapCapacity: 1,536Wh (p1) vs 640Wh (p2), a 2.4x gapRefill time at rated input ≈ capacity ÷ solar watts
Why it mattersFor blackout prep specifically, where recharge speed is as much a survival spec as capacity, the Ultra's advantage compounds instead of trading off against its size.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: The only section that tests the two units head-to-head on real loads; shows where they tie (both fail) and where the Ultra pulls ahead outright.
Three of the six scenarios here aren't really a contest. Weekend Camping (2,100Wh needed), an 8-Hour Blackout (1,645Wh), and Van Life Daily (4,685Wh) all ask for more energy than even the Ultra's 1,536Wh holds, let alone the 600 v2's 640Wh. Neither unit is built for whole-home or multi-day backup, and comparing them further on this front doesn't change that.
The other three separate cleanly. Remote Workday and Tailgate Party both push the 600 v2 past its limit (167% and 123% of usable capacity) while the Ultra stays under it (70% and 51%), not because 500W is too little power for a laptop or a speaker, but because the day's total energy draw is simply more than the 600 v2's battery holds. CPAP Overnight is the interesting exception: both units finish the night (25% for the Ultra, 59% for the 600 v2), but only the Ultra has real margin left if the power is still out on night two.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: cheaperToOwn resolves the price-vs-capacity tension and carries the page's central value argument, given how little separates the two on gotchas.
cost / lifetime kWh
Sticker price says the 600 v2 is the budget option. Ownership economics say otherwise: divide each unit's price across its rated cycles and capacity, and the Ultra costs $0.16 for every lifetime kilowatt-hour it will ever deliver, against $0.26 for the 600 v2. That's the number that should decide this for anyone keeping either unit long enough to use up its rated cycles.
There's one place the small unit nominally comes out ahead: amortized purely across calendar days at a twice-a-week pace, the 600 v2 works out to about $0.05 a day against $0.07 a day for the Ultra. That's spreading the purchase price over however many years the battery would physically survive at that pace, not over the energy it actually delivers each time, which is a narrower question. For cost per watt-hour actually used, the Ultra is the cheaper unit to own; judge it purely by cost-per-calendar-day and the smaller unit edges back ahead.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Both firing gotchas (warranty, cycleLife) look like knocks against the pricier unit at a glance and dissolve once translated into years, worth defusing explicitly.
rated cycles
Neither flagged item here is really a strike against either unit. The warranty is identical in length, 5 years both, so the $200-versus-$100-per-year figure is just the sticker price divided by an identical term, not a signal about which one holds up better.
Cycle life tells a similar story once it's converted into calendar time: at once-a-day use, that's 11 years for the Ultra against 8.2 for the 600 v2; at weekend-only use, 38.5 years against 28.8. For most buying decisions, the honest takeaway is that either battery outlasts the reasonable lifespan of the category. The real differences on this page are capacity and output, not which cells survive longer.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: The one section where the 600 v2 wins outright, and the throughline for the real hook: two different Jackery sub-lines, not two sizes of one product.
weight
Fourteen-point-one pounds is a one-hand carry off the passenger seat. Thirty-eight-point-six is a two-hands, mind-your-back lift, closer to a full case of bottled water than a laptop bag. That 24.5-lb gap is close to the whole reason the 600 v2 exists: Jackery built it to be the lightest 600Wh-class station it sellsB1, and it delivers on that brief. The Ultra's weight buys something the 600 v2 doesn't have: IP65 sealing and a titanium-alloy cooling structure rated against dust, rain, and low-pressure water jetsA1. That's not free, and it isn't supposed to be.
The same split shows up in output and solar input: 1,800W continuous and a 3,600W surge ceiling on the Ultra against 500W and 1,000W on the 600 v2, roughly 3.6x either way, plus 800W of rated solar input against 200W, a 4x gap. None of the six scenarios above happen to hinge on that wattage ceiling specifically, every failure on this page is a capacity shortfall, not a power one, but it's real headroom if your loads ever include something that draws hard at startup, like a compressor fridge, rather than something merely steady, like a laptop.
Strengths & trade-offs
Jackery Explorer 1500 Ultra
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 4,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$580) than the Explorer 600 v2.
- –Significantly heavier (+24.5 lbs), making it harder to move.
Jackery Explorer 600 v2
Strengths
- +Costs $580 less
- +Lighter by 24.5 lb
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-1,300W) limits appliance compatibility.
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 3,000 charge cycles vs the Explorer 1500 Ultra's 4,000, so it wears out sooner.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither wins. Weekend-camping loads need about 2,100Wh, more than either unit holds, using 161% of the Ultra's usable capacity and 386% of the 600 v2's.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither wins. An 8-hour blackout's typical loads run about 1,645Wh, which comes to 126% of the Ultra's usable capacity and 302% of the 600 v2's. Both fall short, the Ultra by far less.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
The Explorer 1500 Ultra takes this one. A CPAP night needs roughly 320Wh, about a quarter of the Ultra's capacity (25%) against well over half of the 600 v2's (59%). Both finish the night; the 600 v2 just has far less left in reserve for a second one.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Explorer 1500 Ultra
The Explorer 1500 Ultra wins clearly. A full workday's power draw (about 910Wh) uses roughly 70% of the Ultra's usable capacity but 167% of the 600 v2's, past full. That's not a wattage problem, since 500W comfortably runs a laptop and a monitor; the 600 v2 simply doesn't hold enough total energy to reach the end of the day.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Explorer 1500 Ultra
The Explorer 1500 Ultra wins. Tailgate-length power draw (about 670Wh) uses about half the Ultra's usable capacity (51%) but tips the 600 v2 past its limit (123%), again an energy shortfall, not a power one.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit is sized for this. Daily van-life power draw runs to about 4,685Wh, 359% of the Ultra's usable capacity and 861% of the 600 v2's. This is a job for a fixed or much larger system.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Explorer 1500 Ultra runs 6.4h vs 2.7h.
$1,199 list · direct from Jackery
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–87hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–17.4hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–1.3h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 28, 2026
Verdict: the Explorer 1500 Ultra, on Power Score margin
The Explorer 1500 Ultra wins on cost per lifetime kilowatt-hour ($0.16 vs $0.26), on continuous output (1,800W vs 500W) and solar input (800W vs 200W), and it's the only unit that finishes Remote Workday and Tailgate Party at all, because the 600 v2 runs out of energy in both, not wattage. The 600 v2's real advantages are weight (14.1 lbs vs 38.6) and a $500 lower price, reason enough to buy it if the load is genuinely CPAP-and-phone small. For anything bigger than that, the Ultra is both the more capable unit and the cheaper one per watt-hour, an unusual combination worth the extra cost.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 28, 2026. The links below open Jackery's current price.
$1,079.00 · direct from Jackery
down from $1,199 · 10% below usual
Last checked 3 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the Explorer 600 v2 price$499.00 list
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 28, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): RV Living, Home Backup, Food Truck.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, Explorer 1500 Ultra rates 3.4/5 (8th percentile of 26 Everyday-class units), and Explorer 600 v2 rates 3.7/5 (26th percentile of 20 Compact-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Five Years Either Way
Both units carry a 5-year warranty, so coverage length isn't the differentiator, cost is. Spread each price across that same 5 years and the Ultra runs about $200 a year against $100 a year for the 600 v2, which is just the sticker price divided by an identical warranty term, not a reflection of what either battery delivers over that stretch.
Cycle Life, Translated Into Years
4,000 rated cycles on the Ultra against 3,000 on the 600 v2 sounds like a modest gap until it's converted into calendar time. Used once a day, that's about 11 years for the Ultra against 8.2 for the 600 v2. Used only on weekends, that stretches to 38.5 years against 28.8, long enough that most buyers will retire either unit for other reasons before the battery gives out.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Explorer 1500 Ultra.
Check Explorer 1500 Ultra price →or check the Explorer 600 v2 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The Explorer 600 v2 is cheaper to buy, but the Explorer 1500 Ultra is cheaper to own. At $0.2/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.26/kWh, the Explorer 1500 Ultra's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years.
Growth path
Explorer 1500 Ultra
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 1,536Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 800W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Explorer 600 v2
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 640Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Neither expands, and that's no knock on either — each is a complete unit at a fixed size. Buy the capacity that covers your needs now (the Explorer 1500 Ultra gives you the larger ceiling); you can't add to either later.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
Jackery Explorer 1500 Ultra
Reviews are still thin here. The Ultra only launched at CES 2026, so this is early, directional sentiment rather than years of ownership data. What's already consistent: the IP65 sealing and titanium-alloy cooling structure come up as the standout feature, something reviewers frame as unusual at this price pointA1. Reviewers rate it highly overall and single out that sealing, the fast AC recharge, and the 4,000-cycle battery as its three defining strengthsA4.
Jackery also markets the roughly 38-lb weight as meaningfully lighter than rival units of similar capacityA2. Worth reading as a manufacturer's comparison against its competitors, not an independent measurement against the 600 v2.
“Built around a 1,536Wh LFP battery with a true IP65 dustproof and water-resistant rating — unique in its price bracket — and a fully sealed titanium-alloy multi-layer cooling structure; totally protected against dust, and resistant to low-pressure water jets, heavy rain, and splashes.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · gearbrain.com · protoolreviews.com · jackery.com · thesolarlab.com
Jackery Explorer 600 v2
Owner feedback is limited but consistently positive: reviewers and owners describe the 600 v2 as affordable, lightweight, easy to carry, and easy to operateB3. It's marketed as the lightest 600Wh-class power station Jackery sellsB1, built around a newer LFP chemistry that's chemically more stable and less prone to overheating than what it replacedB2.
One flag worth carrying forward: some retailers and reviews list a higher output rating and a cycle count well above what's in our own listingB4. This page uses our database figures throughout, 500W and 3,000 cycles, so if you've seen bigger numbers elsewhere, that's the discrepancy, and we're siding with the figure we can verify.
“The world's lightest 600Wh-class power station at about 14 lbs — roughly 23% smaller than similar-capacity models.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · jackery.com · bestecosolar.com · mrsolar.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- IP65 ruggedness (unique at its price), fast recharge, and the 4,000-cycle LFP battery are the standout praise; it is a newer CES-2026 launch so long-term owner data is thin. [Explorer 1500 Ultra · 3 entries]
- Standout light weight (world's lightest 600Wh-class), a newer stable LFP battery, and easy operation are the praise; rated output and cycle figures vary across sources. [Explorer 600 v2 · 3 entries]
- A1
“Built around a 1,536Wh LFP battery with a true IP65 dustproof and water-resistant rating — unique in its price bracket — and a fully sealed titanium-alloy multi-layer cooling structure; totally protected against dust, and resistant to low-pressure water jets, heavy rain, and splashes.”
backuppowerhub.com / gearbrain.com — Explorer 1500 Ultra review · 2026 · [positive]
- A2
“Weighs about 38 lbs, which Jackery claims is up to 53% lighter than comparable competitor units of similar capacity.”
protoolreviews.com / jackery.com — Explorer 1500 Ultra · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“Reviewers score it 9.1/10; its three defining strengths are the IP65 certification, a 1.5-hour AC recharge, and the 4,000-cycle LFP battery with a 5-year warranty.”
thesolarlab.com / backuppowerhub.com — Explorer 1500 Ultra review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“The world's lightest 600Wh-class power station at about 14 lbs — roughly 23% smaller than similar-capacity models.”
backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com — Explorer 600 v2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Uses a shift to LFP (LiFePO4) chemistry that is chemically more stable and far less prone to overheating, engineered with a rating for well over a decade of lifespan — higher than the figure in some spec listings.”
backuppowerhub.com / bestecosolar.com — Explorer 600 v2 review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“Owner feedback highlights that it is affordable, lightweight, easy to carry, and easy to operate.”
backuppowerhub.com — Explorer 600 v2 owner feedback · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Listed AC output varies by source — some cite a 600W rating where others show 500W — so its rated output figure is not fully consistent across listings.”
mrsolar.com / jackery.com — Explorer 600 v2 listings · 2026 · [mixed]
Research compiled July 28, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the Explorer 1500 Ultra if you…
- →Buy the Ultra if your typical draw is a full remote workday (laptop, monitor, phone, maybe a router) or a tailgate's worth of speakers and a mini fridge. Both loads fit inside its 1,536Wh with room to spare, and both are more energy than the 600 v2's 640Wh can hold, regardless of how little wattage either draw needs at any given moment.
- →Buy the Ultra too if you want CPAP backup for more than a single planned night. It uses only about a quarter of its charge for one night, leaving several more nights of margin if the power stays out.
Buy the Explorer 600 v2 if you…
- →Buy the 600 v2 if the job is genuinely small and portability is the priority: a single CPAP night, charging phones and a laptop, or anything under a few hundred watt-hours, where 14.1 lbs beats 38.6 every time you're the one carrying it.
- →It's also the buy if $499 is your real ceiling. Its lifetime cost per watt-hour is higher, but only across years of ownership; today, it's still a genuine LFP power station with a full 5-year warranty, not a compromise.
If neither fits
Skip both if you're planning for a multi-day blackout or full-time van life. Weekend Camping, an 8-Hour Blackout, and Van Life Daily loads all ask for more energy than even the Ultra's 1,536Wh holds in this data, so the honest answer is a larger fixed or expandable system, not either of these portables.
The Bottom Line
The Explorer 1500 Ultra wins this one on almost every axis that isn't weight: more capacity, more continuous output, more solar input, and, despite costing twice as much, a lower cost per lifetime kilowatt-hour than the 600 v2. It also wins outright the only three real-world scenarios here where a winner is possible; the other three are jobs neither unit is sized for.
Buy the 600 v2 only if the load is genuinely small and 14.1 lbs matters more than headroom. Otherwise, the Ultra's extra $500 is buying a better watt-hour, not just a bigger one.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Jackery Explorer 1500 Ultra just a bigger Explorer 600 v2?
No. Beyond the 896Wh capacity gap, the Ultra is Jackery's newer, ruggedized sub-line, sealed to an IP65 rating with a titanium-alloy cooling structure the 600 v2 doesn't have, while the 600 v2 is built around the opposite priority: being the lightest 600Wh-class station Jackery sells. They're different products solving different problems, not two sizes of the same one.
Which one is actually cheaper to own?
The Explorer 1500 Ultra, despite costing twice as much upfront. Spread each unit's price across its rated cycle life and capacity, and the cost per lifetime kilowatt-hour comes out lower for the Ultra, not higher. The smaller, cheaper-looking 600 v2 is the one that costs more for every watt-hour it delivers over its life.
Can either of these run a CPAP for more than one night without recharging?
The Explorer 1500 Ultra can, comfortably: a CPAP night uses only about a quarter of its 1,536Wh, which leaves enough charge for several more nights before it needs a recharge. The 600 v2 can run a single CPAP night fine, but it uses well over half its 640Wh doing it, so it won't complete a full second night without recharging, and a third is well out of reach.
Does either Jackery unit expand with extra battery packs later?
No, both are sealed, fixed-capacity units with no battery-pack or expansion option. Buy the capacity you need up front: the Ultra's 1,536Wh is the larger ceiling of the two, but neither can be added to later.
Where to buy
Jackery Explorer 1500 UltraPick
$1,079.00
$1,079.00 · direct from Jackery
down from $1,199 · 10% below usual
Last checked 3 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Jackery Explorer 600 v2
$499.00
$499.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 3 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.