PSA
StationArena

Head-to-head test

Jackery Explorer 500 vs Jackery Explorer 600 v2

Jackery has stopped selling the Explorer 500. Next to the 600 v2 it shows its age: 800-cycle lithium-ion cells against a 6,000-cycle LiFePO4 pack, a 2-year warranty against 5, and no USB-C port at all.

Full profiles: Jackery Explorer 500 β†’ Β· Jackery Explorer 600 v2 β†’

Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated

Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk

Stack these against 100+ rivals
MethodologyReader-supported β€” we may earn from links (details)

Spec deltas

Capacity
518Wh
640Wh
Output
500W
matched
500W
Weight
13.3 lb
14.1 lb
Typical price
No longer sold
No longer sold
Cost / Wh
β€”
β€”
Cycle life
800
6,000
Solar input
100W
200W
01

Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 500. Its store page now forwards to the HomePower 1000 v2, a much bigger station. If you own a 500, or you've spotted one in a retailer's leftover stock, this page is the comparison you're probably making.

My first power station was a little orange Jackery, so I have a soft spot for this generation. The soft spot ends at the battery. The 500 runs lithium-ion cells rated for 800 cyclesA1. A cycle is one full drain and refill. The 600 v2 runs LiFePO4, an iron-phosphate lithium chemistry that wears far more slowly, and our record rates it for 6,000.

The 600 v2 also carries 122Wh more for less than a pound of extra weight. It has a USB-C port that delivers 100W, and the 500 has none. My camera charges over USB-C, so that would have stopped me before anything else.

02

What the Numbers Reveal

Each conclusion stated first β€” the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.

F1

rated cycles

Use either one twice a week and the 500 reaches its rating in about eight years. The 600 v2 would take decades.

Explorer 500: 800 rated cycles on lithium-ionExplorer 600 v2: 6,000 rated cycles on LiFePO4Lifetime energy over the rated cycles: about 414kWh against 3,840kWh

Why it mattersIf you'll use a station hard for years, the battery is where these two differ most.

F2

For a station you mean to keep, three extra years of cover are three years in which a failure is Jackery's problem.

Explorer 500: 2-year warrantyExplorer 600 v2: up to 5 years, with registration

Why it mattersRegister the 600 v2 the week it arrives. The extra years depend on it.

F3

solar input

The 600 v2 takes twice the panel wattage, so it refills a bigger battery in less of the day.

Explorer 500: 100W solar input, about 5.2 hours of ideal sun to refill 518WhExplorer 600 v2: 200W solar input

Why it mattersIf a folding panel on the dashboard is your main charger, the 600 v2 is the one that keeps up.

F4

That spare covers a phone, a lantern or a slow start to the morning. Usable here is our working figure, about 85% of the label.

CPAP Overnight needs about 320WhUsable energy: 440Wh on the Explorer 500, 544Wh on the Explorer 600 v2Left by morning: 120Wh against 224Wh

Why it mattersOnly the 600 v2 lists a UPS mode, so it's the one that can stay plugged in by the bed and take over when the grid drops.

The specific dimensions that decide these two units β€” everything else is a tie.

Lifetime Value

Selected because: Seven and a half times the rated cycles is the biggest gap between these two, and it shows best as lifetime energy.

The 500's 800 cycles add up to about 414kWh over its rated life. The 600 v2's 6,000 add up to about 3,840kWh. Those totals are what each pack is rated to deliver before it starts to fade.

Fading is not dying. At the end of its rating a pack drops to around 80% of what it held new and keeps working. A 500 that has had an easy life still has plenty in it. If I were buying today, though, I'd skip a leftover 500 and get the 600 v2.

What the Specs Don't Tell You

Selected because: UPS mode, app control and solar recharge time are concrete, spec-true differences.

rated cycles

Three gotchas fire against the 500. Solar refills are slow at 100W. There's no app, so checking the battery means walking over to it. And its spec sheet lists no UPS mode.

UPS mode means the station sits between the wall and your gear and takes over when the power drops. The 600 v2 is rated to switch in no more than 20ms. That's fast enough on paper for a router or a CPAP. The fussiest desktop power supplies sit right at that line.

Your Life, Your Pick

Selected because: CPAP Overnight is the one job both handle, and it shows the headroom gap.

Only the CPAP night fits either unit, and both finish it. The 600 v2 has more left over. A tailgate gets the 600 v2 most of the way and the 500 about two thirds.

The camping weekend, the eight-hour blackout and van life are well past both. These are stations for a device or two. For a house you want something several times bigger.

Growth Path

Selected because: Neither expands, so the capacity bought today is permanent for both.

solar input

Neither expands, so whatever you buy is the size you keep. Between these two, the extra 122Wh on the 600 v2 costs you less than a pound.

Strengths & trade-offs

Jackery Explorer 500

Strengths

  • +Lighter by 0.8 lb

Trade-offs

  • –Lacks smartphone app control for remote monitoring.
  • –Shorter-lived battery β€” rated for 800 charge cycles vs the Explorer 600 v2's 6,000, so it wears out sooner.

Jackery Explorer 600 v2

Strengths

  • +Larger battery capacity
  • +Longer warranty
  • +Faster solar charging
  • +Rated for 6,000 charge cycles β€” much longer battery lifespan

Trade-offs

  • –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
03

Will It Power Your Gear?

Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.

Scenario verdicts

We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.

SCN-01 Β· 2 nights Β· needs 2,100Wh

Weekend Camping

Two nights off-grid with essential comfort

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the Explorer 500 comes up 1,660Wh short (about 21% covered), the Explorer 600 v2 1,556Wh (26%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Camping power station guide β†’

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β Phone Charger 15WΓ—6h Β· LED Lights 40WΓ—8h Β· Box Fan 75WΓ—14h Β· CPAP Machine 40WΓ—16h

SCN-02 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 1,645Wh

8-Hour Blackout

Keep the essentials running through a night without power

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 1,645Wh: the Explorer 500 comes up 1,205Wh short (about 27% covered), the Explorer 600 v2 1,101Wh (33%). Treat this as partial cover β€” enough for the essentials in it, not the whole list.

Emergency blackout power guide β†’

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β Fridge 150WΓ—8h Β· Router + Modem 20WΓ—8h Β· LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40WΓ—6h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ—3h

SCN-03 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 320Wh

CPAP Overnight

Sleep therapy without interruption β€” the #1 medical use case

Either unit

Both get through a 320Wh CPAP night. The 500 has about 120Wh left by morning, the 600 v2 about 224Wh. Only the 600 v2 lists a UPS mode, so only it can stay plugged in and take over if the power drops in the night.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β CPAP Machine 40WΓ—8h

SCN-04 Β· 8 hours Β· needs 910Wh

Remote Workday

Full work day off-grid without power anxiety

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 910Wh: the Explorer 500 comes up 470Wh short (about 48% covered), the Explorer 600 v2 366Wh (60%). Treat this as partial cover β€” enough for the essentials in it, not the whole list.

UPS & desk backup guide β†’

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β Laptop 60WΓ—8h Β· External Monitor 30WΓ—8h Β· Router + Modem 20WΓ—8h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ—2h

SCN-05 Β· 4 hours Β· needs 670Wh

Tailgate Party

Game day power for the crew

Neither unit

Neither finishes a 670Wh afternoon. The 600 v2 gets about 81% of the way and the 500 about two thirds. Plan the playlist accordingly.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β Blender 400WΓ—0.5h Β· LED TV (55") 80WΓ—4h Β· Bluetooth Speaker 15WΓ—4h Β· Phone Charger (Γ—3) 45WΓ—2h

SCN-06 Β· 24 hours Β· needs 4,685Wh

Van Life Daily

A full day of mobile living β€” the ultimate endurance test

Neither unit

Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the Explorer 500 comes up 4,245Wh short (about 9% covered), the Explorer 600 v2 4,141Wh (12%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOADΒ Β Mini-Fridge 150WΓ—24h Β· Laptop 60WΓ—4h Β· Phone Charger 15WΓ—3h Β· LED Lights 40WΓ—5h Β· Fan 75WΓ—8h

The Load Test

RUNTIME = (Wh Γ— 0.85) Γ· LOAD

None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.

Essentials

Comfort & Convenience

High-Draw Appliances

Test duration

8h

Continuous draw

205W

Projected runtime

Explorer 5002.1h
dead in 2.1h β€” before your 8h window ends
Explorer 600 v22.7h
dead in 2.7h β€” before your 8h window ends

For this load: Explorer 600 v2 runs 2.7h vs 2.1h.

Planning for more than this? Describe your whole setup and get it sizedΒ β†’

Modeled from the spec record β€” same math as the tables below. Methodology

Runtime by appliance

Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.ΒΉ

Essentials

The basics you need runningscale 0–36.3h
ApplianceExplorer 500Explorer 600 v2
CPAP Machine40W draw
Explorer 500: 11h1 full night
Explorer 600 v2: 13.6h1 full night
Phone Charger15W draw
Explorer 500: 29.4h
Explorer 600 v2: 36.3h
Router + Modem20W draw
Explorer 500: 22h
Explorer 600 v2: 27.2h
Starlink75W draw
Explorer 500: 5.9h
Explorer 600 v2: 7.3h
LED Lights (4 bulbs)40W draw
Explorer 500: 11h
Explorer 600 v2: 13.6h
Laptop (Working)60W draw
Explorer 500: 7.3h
Explorer 600 v2: 9.1h

Comfort & Convenience

Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–7.3h
ApplianceExplorer 500Explorer 600 v2
Box Fan75W draw
Explorer 500: 5.9h
Explorer 600 v2: 7.3h
LED TV (55")80W draw
Explorer 500: 5.5h
Explorer 600 v2: 6.8h
Mini-Fridge150W draw
Explorer 500: 2.9h
Explorer 600 v2: 3.6h
Electric Blanket200W draw
Explorer 500: 2.2h0 full nights
Explorer 600 v2: 2.7h0 full nights

High-Draw Appliances

These reveal the real limits
ApplianceExplorer 500Explorer 600 v2
Coffee Maker1000W draw
Explorer 500: β€” exceeds output
Explorer 600 v2: β€” exceeds output
Microwave1200W draw
Explorer 500: β€” exceeds output
Explorer 600 v2: β€” exceeds output
Space Heater1500W draw
Explorer 500: β€” exceeds output
Explorer 600 v2: β€” exceeds output

ΒΉ Runtime = (capacity Γ— 0.85) Γ· appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads β€” see methodology.

Conclusion

October 25, 2026

Verdict withdrawn: the Explorer 600 v2 is no longer sold

We picked the Explorer 600 v2, but neither unit is sold new any more. The comparison below still helps if you own one.

β– β– β– β– β– β– β– β– β– β–‘9/10

Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.

Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester Β· Station Arena Test Desk Β· Updated October 25, 2026

04

Measured Data

Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.

Benchmark scores

Explorer 500Explorer 600 v2
Overall Power Score
1,459
2,180
Apartment BalconyCompact Solar Living
1,728
2,486
CampingLightweight & Versatile
1,830
2,413

Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): UPS, CPAP, Solar Generator, Tailgating.

Full specifications

Explorer 500
No longer sold
Explorer 600 v2
No longer sold
Capacity (Wh)
518
640
Output (W)
500
500
Surge Peak
1000W
1000W
AC Outlets
1
2
240V Outlets
-
0
30A RV Outlets
-
0

ᡈ Derived: price Γ· rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons β†’

Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool β†’
How these numbers are produced

Numeric verification

Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it β€” no estimated numbers.

Owner claims

Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews β€” see Sources & Research Notes below.

Runtime model

Runtime = (rated capacity Γ— 0.85 inverter efficiency) Γ· device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.

Power Score

Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.

See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page β†’

Class ranking (the star rating)

Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews β€” no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5β˜…. Here, Explorer 500 rates 3.3/5 (1st percentile of 20 Compact-class units), and Explorer 600 v2 rates 4.2/5 (53rd percentile of 20 Compact-class units).

How the class ranking is computed β†’

Test Notes & Caveats

Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.

[NOTE]

Explorer 500: Solar Recharge Takes 5.2h+

At its 100W rated solar ceiling, refilling the full 518Wh takes about 5.2 hours of sun β€” as a floor, since the rated figure assumes ideal panel angle and clear sky, and real days deliver less. Not practical as the primary charge source for daily off-grid use; treat solar as a top-up and plan on a wall outlet or generator.

[NOTE]

Explorer 500: No App Control

Without app control, you have to physically walk to the Explorer 500 to check battery level, adjust settings, or monitor power draw. The Explorer 600 v2 lets you do all that from your phone, including getting low-battery alerts.

[ADVANTAGE]

Only the 600 v2 Lists a UPS Mode

The 500's spec sheet lists no uninterruptible-power mode. The 600 v2 can sit between the wall and a router, modem or CPAP and take over in no more than 20ms when the grid drops.

[NOTE]

Five Years Against Two

The 600 v2 is covered for up to 5 years once registered with Jackery. The 500 carried 2. For a station you plan to keep, register the newer one the week it arrives.

[NOTE]

6,000 Cycles Against 800

The 600 v2's LiFePO4 pack is rated for 6,000 cycles. The 500's lithium-ion cells are rated for 800. At twice a week, that's decades against about eight years. Either pack keeps working past its rating, at around 80% of its original capacity.

05

Ownership Analysis

What happens after you buy β€” true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.

Lifetime value

Explorer 500Explorer 600 v2

β”‚ warranty ends Β· Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains β€” degraded, not dead.

Explorer 500
Explorer 600 v2
Purchase price
No longer sold
No longer sold
Lifetime energy delivered
414 kWh
3,840 kWh
Cost per lifetime kWh
β€”
β€”
Cost per warranty year
β€”
β€”
Battery lifespan
2.2yr daily Β· 7.7yr weekends Β· 15.4yr weekly
16.4yr daily Β· 57.7yr weekends Β· 115.4yr weekly

Analyst note

Neither is sold new any more, so there is no price left to work a cost per kWh from, and what either costs you now depends on the used market. The hardware comparison still holds: over its rated life the Explorer 500 delivers about 414 kWh and the Explorer 600 v2 about 3,840 kWh.

Growth path

Explorer 500

FIXED CAPACITY

Fixed at 518Wh, with no expansion β€” so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.

Accepts up to 100W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.

Explorer 600 v2

FIXED CAPACITY

Fixed at 640Wh, with no expansion β€” so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.

Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.

Explorer 500Explorer 600 v2

Analyst note

Neither of these is sold new any more, so there is no growth path to buy into on either side. If you already own one: the Explorer 500 is fixed at 518Wh and the Explorer 600 v2 is fixed at 640Wh. As a purchase decision, expandability isn't the question here.

06

What Owners Report

Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews β€” every claim cited to its source below.

Jackery Explorer 500

Reviewers describe the 500 as a compact, affordable way into Jackery's range for weekend and occasional useA3. At about 13 lbs it carries easilyA2.

The catch is the cells. It runs older lithium-ion, and Jackery rates it to keep 80% of its capacity after 800 cyclesA1. Reviewers note that Jackery's newer LiFePO4 units were built to fix exactly thatA4. Our research reads the plain 500 as the generation Jackery has moved pastA0.

β€œ518Wh capacity with a 500W output, on traditional lithium-ion cells β€” Jackery rates 80% capacity retention after 800 cycles.”
β€” backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com β€” Explorer 500 review, 2026

Sources

backuppowerhub.com Β· jackery.com Β· greencitizen.com Β· poweredportablesolar.com Β· batteryessence.com

Jackery Explorer 600 v2

Owners describe the 600 v2 as affordable, light, easy to carry and easy to runB3. Jackery bills it as the lightest station in the 600Wh class, at about 14 lbsB1. One review singles out the move to LiFePO4 as the big change, a chemistry that is more stable and less prone to overheatingB2. Our researcher couldn't confirm which model that source describes, so read it for character only.

Some listings credit it with more than 500W of AC output. Jackery's own page publishes 500W, and that's the figure used hereB0. It has also been out of stock at times as production ramps up, so check before you plan around itB0.

β€œThe world's lightest 600Wh-class power station at about 14 lbs β€” roughly 23% smaller than similar-capacity models.”
β€” backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com β€” Explorer 600 v2 review, 2026

Sources

backuppowerhub.com Β· jackery.com Β· bestecosolar.com Β· mrsolar.com

Sources & Research Notes

Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.

Recurring owner themes

  • Affordable, portable Jackery entry unit, but on older lithium-ion chemistry with limited cycle life vs newer LFP models. [Explorer 500 Β· 3 entries]
  • Standout light weight (world's lightest 600Wh-class), a newer stable LFP battery, and easy operation are the praise; rated output and cycle figures vary across sources. [Explorer 600 v2 Β· 3 entries]
  • A1

    β€œ518Wh capacity with a 500W output, on traditional lithium-ion cells β€” Jackery rates 80% capacity retention after 800 cycles.”

    backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com β€” Explorer 500 review Β· 2026 Β· [mixed]

  • A2

    β€œWeighs about 13 lbs β€” a compact, portable unit.”

    greencitizen.com / poweredportablesolar.com β€” Explorer 500 review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]

  • A3

    β€œThe 518Wh capacity at $449 is the most affordable entry into Jackery's reliable ecosystem β€” good for weekend warriors and occasional users.”

    backuppowerhub.com β€” Explorer 500 review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]

  • A4

    β€œAn older lithium-ion unit; the newer Explorer 500 v2 uses LiFePO4 rated for far more cycles, offering significantly better longevity.”

    batteryessence.com / backuppowerhub.com β€” Explorer 500 v2 review Β· 2026 Β· [mixed]

  • B1

    β€œThe world's lightest 600Wh-class power station at about 14 lbs β€” roughly 23% smaller than similar-capacity models.”

    backuppowerhub.com / jackery.com β€” Explorer 600 v2 review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]

  • B2

    β€œUses a shift to LFP (LiFePO4) chemistry that is chemically more stable and far less prone to overheating, engineered with a rating for well over a decade of lifespan β€” higher than the figure in some spec listings.”

    backuppowerhub.com / bestecosolar.com β€” Explorer 600 v2 review Β· 2026 Β· [positive]

  • B3

    β€œOwner feedback highlights that it is affordable, lightweight, easy to carry, and easy to operate.”

    backuppowerhub.com β€” Explorer 600 v2 owner feedback Β· 2026 Β· [positive]

Research compiled October 25, 2026.

07

Who Should Buy Which

Buy the Explorer 500 if you…

  • β†’You already own one and use it a few weekends a year. At that pace its 800 cycles will last a long while, so keep using it.
  • β†’It's the station already in your cupboard and the job is small. It runs a CPAP night with some left over.

Buy the Explorer 600 v2 if you…

  • β†’You want something near the 500's size that you can still buy new, with a LiFePO4 pack rated for 6,000 cycles.
  • β†’You run a CPAP, a router or a camera kit and want USB-C, an app and a UPS mode in the same box.

If neither fits

If your real need is a camping weekend or an eight-hour blackout, both fall far short. Our load model puts those at about 2,100Wh and 1,645Wh. Look at a station with two or three times the capacity.

08

The Bottom Line

The Explorer 500 has left Jackery's store, and next to the 600 v2 it shows why. The newer box carries a bit more battery, a pack rated for seven and a half times the cycles, and more than twice the warranty.

If you own a 500, keep using it for light jobs until it fades. If you're buying, get the 600 v2. It weighs less than a pound more and does every job here at least as well.

09

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.

Is the Jackery Explorer 500 or Explorer 600 v2 the better buy?

The Explorer 600 v2. Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 500. The 600 v2 holds 640Wh against 518Wh, uses a LiFePO4 battery rated for 6,000 cycles against the 500's 800-cycle lithium-ion, and carries up to a 5-year warranty with registration against 2.

What actually changed between the two units?

The battery chemistry, mainly. The 500 uses lithium-ion cells rated for 800 cycles. The 600 v2 uses LiFePO4 rated for 6,000. Over their rated lives that is about 414kWh of energy from the 500 and about 3,840kWh from the 600 v2. The 600 v2 also adds a 100W USB-C port, app control and a UPS mode.

Does either Jackery unit support CPAP use overnight?

Yes, both can. A CPAP at about 40W for eight hours needs roughly 320Wh. The 500 finishes with about 120Wh left and the 600 v2 with about 224Wh. Both noise figures are Jackery's best-case ratings, not readings at a CPAP's light draw, so they can't tell you which is quieter at a bedside.

Is the Explorer 600 v2's extra capacity worth it?

It isn't the main reason to pick it. The bigger difference is the battery: 6,000 rated cycles against 800, and a 5-year warranty against 2. The 122Wh of extra capacity comes on top.

Why does the Explorer 500 deliver so much less energy over its life?

Because its battery is rated for far fewer cycles. At 800 cycles of 518Wh it delivers about 414kWh over its rated life. The 600 v2's 6,000 cycles of 640Wh come to about 3,840kWh. Reaching the rating doesn't kill either pack. It drops to around 80% of its original capacity.

Where to buy

Explorer 500

Jackery Explorer 500

Left Jackery's store

Explorer 600 v2

Jackery Explorer 600 v2

Sold out at Jackery

Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.