Head-to-head test
BLUETTI Pioneer 150 AC240 vs Jackery Explorer 1000 Plus
Same $999 price, lifetime cost within a penny of each other — so the entire decision comes down to whether 272 more watt-hours and IP65 sealing are worth carrying 40 extra pounds and living with 20 extra decibels.
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
BLUETTI
Pioneer 150 AC240
3,490Power Score · Appliance Class
$999.00 list · direct from BLUETTI
Jackery
Explorer 1000 Plus
3,151Power Score · Appliance Class
$999.00 list · direct from Jackery
Spec deltas
The BLUETTI Pioneer 150 (AC240) and Jackery Explorer 1000 Plus both list at $999, and that's where the similarity mostly ends. The Pioneer holds 1,536Wh in a 72-lb IP65-sealed case; the Explorer holds 1,264Wh in a 32-lb unsealed one — 272 more watt-hours for more than double the weight.
Six months of real ownership backs the Explorer's numbers: dozens of camping trips, two extended outages, and daily home-office use, running a refrigerator, lights, a laptop, and a Wi-Fi router at once during a simulated blackout without complaintB3. The Pioneer's IP65 rating has its own field evidence — water beading off the case in a rainstorm, the interior staying dry through constant saltwater spray on a sailboatA2 — with one real caveat: that sealing applies with the port covers closed, not to a unit actively charging in the rainA1.
Run the ownership math and these two land within a penny of each other per lifetime kilowatt-hour. This isn't a value decision. It's a decision about who's doing the lifting.
What the Numbers Reveal
Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.
weight
That extra weight isn't buying cheaper energy, either — the Pioneer's own cost per Wh ($0.65) already beats the Explorer's ($0.79), so BLUETTI isn't pricing efficiency into the added bulk. It's simply a bigger battery pack riding in the same $999 box.
Pioneer 150 AC240: 1,536Wh capacity, 72 lbsExplorer 1000 Plus: 1,264Wh capacity, 32 lbs
Why it mattersAnyone who lifts this unit in and out of a trunk or up a flight of stairs regularly should weigh that 40-lb difference literally, since both units already clear CPAP Overnight and Remote Workday with capacity to spare regardless of which one you pick.
That's a real, audible cost of moving 2,400W of continuous output through a sealed IP65 chassis, not a defect. The Explorer's smaller, quieter build is the one you can run in a bedroom without a second thought.
Pioneer 150 AC240: 50dB under loadExplorer 1000 Plus: 30dB
Why it mattersIf this is running a CPAP or sitting in a small room overnight, the Explorer's 30dB rating is the more livable number regardless of which unit wins on paper elsewhere.
rated cycles
That's the real headline hiding under the weight and noise numbers. The Pioneer's bigger battery and longer warranty roughly cancel out the Explorer's higher cycle count and lower per-Wh price — on pure ownership economics, this is a coin flip.
Pioneer 150 AC240: $999, 1,536Wh capacity, 3,500 rated cycles, 6-year warrantyExplorer 1000 Plus: $999, 1,264Wh capacity, 4,000 rated cycles, 5-year warranty
Why it mattersBuyers should stop trying to find a value winner here — there isn't one — and decide on the physical differences instead: 40 lbs and 20dB of IP65-rugged capacity versus a lighter, quieter, unsealed box.
The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.
Portability & Form Factor
Selected because: 72 lbs vs 32 lbs is the single largest physical difference in this pairing and the crux of the verdict.
weight
Seventy-two pounds is a two-hands, bent-knees lift — closer to a loaded gym bag than something you swing into a trunk one-handed. The Explorer at 32 lbs is the one you actually pick up without thinking about it, load into an SUV solo, or carry down to a dock.
That 40-lb gap buys real things: 272Wh more capacity, IP65 sealing rated to survive a rainstorm or saltwater spray with the port covers closedA2, and 400W more solar input. Whether that trade is worth it depends entirely on how often you're the one carrying it.
Lifetime Value
Selected because: The engine's own math puts these within a penny per lifetime kWh — worth stating plainly since it isn't what decides this.
cost / lifetime kWh
Run the ownership math and these land within a penny of each other: $0.19 per lifetime kilowatt-hour for the Pioneer, $0.20 for the Explorer, off the identical $999 sticker. The Pioneer's bigger 1,536Wh battery and 6-year warranty roughly cancel out the Explorer's higher 4,000-cycle rating and lower per-Wh price.
That makes this the rare comparison on this site where lifetime cost genuinely shouldn't decide the purchase — it's close enough to call a tie. Decide on weight and noise instead.
Your Life, Your Pick
Selected because: The Pioneer's headroom wins in Remote Workday and Tailgate Party are real but marginal — both units already handle the load.
CPAP Overnight is a clean tie — both units use well under a third of their capacity keeping a machine running overnight. Weekend Camping, the 8-Hour Blackout, and Van Life Daily beat both units outright; neither is sized for that job, and the gap between them doesn't matter when both fail it.
Remote Workday and Tailgate Party go to the Pioneer, but check what 'wins' means here: both units can already handle each job. The Pioneer just finishes with more capacity left in reserve — 70% used against the Explorer's 85% on Remote Workday, 51% against 62% on Tailgate. That's margin, not capability.
What the Specs Don't Tell You
Selected because: Weight, noise, and surge-to-continuous ratio are the concrete, spec-true differentiators once price and lifetime cost wash out.
rated cycles
The Pioneer's 72 lbs earns its own callout, and so does its fan: 50dB under load against the Explorer's 30dB, a genuinely audible difference in a quiet room. Both are the direct cost of moving 2,400W of continuous output through a sealed IP65 case.
The Explorer's surge rating relative to its own continuous output is proportionally the stronger of the two — 4,000W surge against a 2,000W continuous rating is a 2:1 ratio, versus the Pioneer's 3,600W against 2,400W, a 1.5:1 ratio. It's headroom most buyers will never touch, but it's the kind that matters the one time a compressor spikes hard at startup.
Strengths & trade-offs
BLUETTI Pioneer 150 AC240
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Longer warranty
- +Faster solar charging
Trade-offs
- –Significantly heavier (+40 lbs), making it harder to move.
Jackery Explorer 1000 Plus
Strengths
- +Lighter by 40 lb
Trade-offs
- –No major technical downsides compared to rival.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 2,100Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 1,645Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Either unit
A clean tie. Both units use well under a third of their capacity running a CPAP overnight, so weight and noise, not power, should decide this one for a bedside setup.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Pioneer 150 AC240
The Pioneer finishes a full workday with more capacity in reserve than the Explorer, but both units complete the job — this is a margin difference, not a pass-fail one.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Pioneer 150 AC240
Same story as Remote Workday: the Pioneer has more room left in the tank, but neither unit struggles with a tailgate afternoon.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Pioneer 150 AC240 runs 6.4h vs 5.2h.
$999 list · direct from BLUETTI
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–87hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–17.4hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–1.3h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 14, 2026
Verdict: the Jackery Explorer 1000 Plus
This is close, and the engine's own numbers say so: the Pioneer 150 is technically the cheaper unit to own ($0.19 per lifetime kWh against $0.20) and it wins Remote Workday and Tailgate Party on capacity headroom. But 'wins' there means finishing those jobs with more room to spare — both units already complete them. What isn't a rounding error is 72 lbs against 32, and 50dB against 30dB under load. For most buyers moving a $999 power station between a car, a house, and a campsite, the Explorer is the one that actually gets carried and the one you can run near a bed without a second thought. Buy the Pioneer only if it's staying in one spot — an RV, a garage, a boat — where IP65 sealing and the extra capacity are worth more than never having to lift it.
Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.
List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open BLUETTI's and Jackery's current prices.
$999.00 list · direct from Jackery
or check the Pioneer 150 AC240 price$999.00 list
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): CPAP, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, Pioneer 150 AC240 rates 4.6/5 (74th percentile of 24 Everyday-class units), and Explorer 1000 Plus rates 3.7/5 (26th percentile of 24 Everyday-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
72 Pounds Is a Two-Person Conversation
That's more than double the Explorer's 32 lbs, and it's not a number you feel until you're loading it into a trunk or up a flight of stairs alone. Plan on a permanent spot for this one, not frequent moves.
20 Decibels Is Louder Than It Sounds on a Spec Sheet
50dB under load against the Explorer's 30dB is a genuinely audible gap in a quiet room — more dishwasher than refrigerator hum. It's the direct cost of moving 2,400W through a sealed IP65 case, not a defect.
Surge Power: Inverter Quality Indicator
The Explorer 1000 Plus has a 2× surge-to-continuous ratio vs the Pioneer 150 AC240's 1.5×. A higher ratio (≥2×) means the inverter handles motor startup surges better. That's critical for fridges, AC compressors, and power tools that briefly draw 2-3× their rated wattage. The Pioneer 150 AC240 may trip when starting these appliances even though its continuous wattage looks sufficient.
UPS Speed: standby (<20ms) vs standby (<20ms)
The Pioneer 150 AC240 switches to battery in 15ms (standby (<20ms)), while the Explorer 1000 Plus takes 20ms (standby (<20ms)). Most electronics handle this fine, but sensitive server equipment may hiccup. This matters if you're using it as a home UPS for always-on equipment.
Warranty Value Comparison
The Pioneer 150 AC240 gives you 6 years of warranty per $1,000 spent, vs the Explorer 1000 Plus's 5 years. That's 1.2× more coverage per dollar. An underrated factor if you're keeping this unit for years.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Explorer 1000 Plus.
Check Explorer 1000 Plus price →or check the Pioneer 150 AC240 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
Both units have similar long-term ownership costs ($0.19/kWh vs $0.2/kWh). The price difference is what you see on the sticker — neither is a hidden bargain or rip-off.
Brand trust
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups in the category, from budget units to multi-kWh flagships, including sodium-ion and vehicle-integration products.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space — some owners get smooth service, others weeks of runaround.
Community
Active and growing, second-largest in the category by engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
The best capacity-to-price ratio in the market, with full LFP standardization across the lineup.
Worth knowing
Buying direct from the brand's own site tends to produce better support outcomes than third-party retailers.
Jackery
Ecosystem
A wide lineup of portable and home-backup stations plus a matching solar panel line.
Support
US-based but widely criticized for slow, scripted responses and strict warranty documentation.
Community
The smallest of the major brands online, though general brand recognition is high.
App experience
Rated 2.3-3.3/5 iOS and Android — the weakest app experience of the major brands. Multiple confusing apps (Jackery app vs Jackery Home) and mandatory login even offline.
Unique strength
The widest retail footprint of any brand in the category.
Worth knowing
The app experience trails every major rival.
Analyst note
BLUETTI wins on raw value and lineup breadth; Jackery wins on shelf recognition and return-policy safety nets at big retailers. Support quality is a wash on both sides — pick the hardware, then buy from wherever gives you the easiest return if something's wrong.
Growth path
Pioneer 150 AC240
EXPANDABLESupports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 1,536Wh.
Accepts up to 1,200W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.
Explorer 1000 Plus
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 1,264Wh.
Accepts up to 800W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Both expand, but the Pioneer 150 AC240's higher solar ceiling (1,200W vs 800W) gives it the stronger off-grid growth path — more panels can feed a bigger bank as it grows.
What Owners Report
Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.
BLUETTI Pioneer 150 AC240
The Pioneer 150 shares its rugged IP65 shell with BLUETTI's higher-capacity AC240P, just at a lower price and capacityA3. Real-world testing backs the rating up — reviewers report water beading off the case in a rainstorm with the interior staying bone dry, and one owner ran it through constant saltwater spray on a sailboat with no issues after wiping it downA2. The caveat is real, too: IP65 covers the sealed case with the port covers closed, not a unit actively charging or discharging in the rain with cables plugged inA1 — it's weatherproof right up until the moment you actually need the ports. Reviewers also note fast LFP charging and a genuine path to a large multi-kWh expansion bank, calling it the premium end of BLUETTI's lineup but frequently discountedA4.
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, not truly waterproof — protection applies with the port covers closed, and it should not be used in the rain with cables plugged in, as water ingress to the output ports risks damage or short circuits.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · bluettipower.com · makeuseof.com · storagereview.com · amazon.com · batteryessence.com
Jackery Explorer 1000 Plus
Six months of real ownership is the strongest evidence here: dozens of camping trips, two extended outages, and daily home-office use, with the Explorer running a refrigerator, lights, a laptop, and a Wi-Fi router at once during a simulated blackout without complaintB3. Reviewers separately confirm the LiFePO4 battery holds its full rated cycle count and recharges quickly from the wall, with the inverter shrugging off surge loadsB1. It expands, too — owners note you can add extra batteries for a substantially larger bank, enough to keep a fridge running for days in an extended outageB2, which is a large part of why it keeps getting named one of the best-rounded units in its class this yearB4.
“The LiFePO4 battery genuinely hits 4,000 cycles, AC recharge consistently shows ~1.7-hour full charges, and the 2,000W pure sine wave inverter handles surge loads.”
Sources
backuppowerhub.com · thesolarlab.com · vettedhomegear.com · walkingsolar.com · mtnweekly.com · sparklingpicks.com · trustedreviews.com
Sources & Research Notes
Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.
Recurring owner themes
- Same IP65 ruggedness and expandability as the AC240P at a lower price and capacity; water-resistant not waterproof is the key caveat. [Pioneer 150 AC240 · 3 entries]
- Expandability to a multi-kWh bank, dependable 2,000W output, fast charging, and best-rounded-of-2026 status are the consistent praise. [Explorer 1000 Plus · 3 entries]
- A1
“IP65 water- and dust-resistant, not truly waterproof — protection applies with the port covers closed, and it should not be used in the rain with cables plugged in, as water ingress to the output ports risks damage or short circuits.”
backuppowerhub.com / bluettipower.com — AC240 review · 2026 · [mixed]
- A2
“Real-world testing was positive — water beaded off the case in a rainstorm and the interior was bone dry afterward; the unit survived constant saltwater spray on a sailboat with no moisture intrusion after wiping down.”
makeuseof.com / storagereview.com — AC240 review · 2026 · [positive]
- A3
“The standard AC240 (Pioneer 150) holds 1,536Wh at a lower price than the AC240P, with the same 2,400W output and IP65 rugged build.”
bluettipower.com / amazon.com — Pioneer 150 (AC240) listing · 2026 · [positive]
- A4
“LFP battery with a fast charge reaching most of full quickly, and expandable to a very large multi-kWh bank; sits at the premium end of the lineup but is frequently discounted.”
amazon.com / batteryessence.com — Pioneer 150 (AC240) review · 2026 · [positive]
- B1
“The LiFePO4 battery genuinely hits 4,000 cycles, AC recharge consistently shows ~1.7-hour full charges, and the 2,000W pure sine wave inverter handles surge loads.”
backuppowerhub.com / thesolarlab.com — Explorer 1000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- B2
“Expandable — you can add up to three additional batteries, bringing total capacity to about 5,000Wh; at maximum you could run a refrigerator for 3+ days or power a home office through multi-day outages.”
backuppowerhub.com / vettedhomegear.com — Explorer 1000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
- B3
“After six months across dozens of camping trips, two extended outages, and daily home-office use, it ran every appliance within its 2,000W rating; in a simulated outage it powered a refrigerator, lights, a laptop, and a Wi-Fi router simultaneously.”
walkingsolar.com / mtnweekly.com — Explorer 1000 Plus 6-month review · 2026 · [positive]
- B4
“Widely called one of the most well-rounded portable power stations of 2026 — 4,000-cycle LFP battery, 2,000W output, fast wall charging, and expandable design check every important box.”
sparklingpicks.com / trustedreviews.com — Explorer 1000 Plus review · 2026 · [positive]
Research compiled July 14, 2026.
Who Should Buy Which
Buy the Pioneer 150 AC240 if you…
- →You want IP65 sealing for genuine outdoor or marine use and can live with the port-covers-closed caveat.
- →This lives in an RV, garage, or basecamp where it's set up once, not lifted often — 72 lbs is a non-issue if it never leaves its spot.
- →You want the higher solar ceiling for faster off-grid recharging.
Buy the Explorer 1000 Plus if you…
- →You're the one carrying it — 32 lbs versus 72 is the difference between a one-handed lift and a two-person job.
- →You want it near a bed or in a small room — 30dB against 50dB is a real, audible gap.
- →You don't need IP65 sealing and would rather not pay for it in weight.
If neither fits
If your real need is a two-night camping trip (about 2,100Wh) or an 8-hour multi-appliance blackout (about 1,645Wh), both fall short — the Pioneer needs 161% and 126% of what's required, the Explorer 195% and 153%. Step up to a larger-capacity unit from either brand instead.
The Bottom Line
These two land within a penny of each other on lifetime cost, so the usual value math doesn't settle this one. What does is the physical experience of owning either: 72 lbs and 50dB of IP65-rugged capacity against 32 lbs and 30dB of unsealed, easy-to-carry power.
Buy the Pioneer if it's staying put and the ruggedness matters. Buy the Explorer if you're the one who has to pick it up — at the same $999, that's worth more than 272 extra watt-hours to most people.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Are the Pioneer 150 AC240 and Explorer 1000 Plus really the same price?
Yes — both list at $999. For that price the Pioneer offers 272Wh more capacity, IP65 weather sealing, and a 6-year warranty; the Explorer offers less than half the weight (32 lbs vs 72), a 30dB noise rating against 50dB, and a higher 4,000-cycle rating.
Which one is actually cheaper to own?
Almost exactly the same. The engine's lifetime math puts the Pioneer at $0.19 per lifetime kilowatt-hour and the Explorer at $0.20 — a rounding error, not a real gap. Don't decide this comparison on ownership cost; decide it on weight and noise instead.
Is the Pioneer 150 AC240 actually waterproof?
No — it's IP65 rated, which covers the sealed case with the port covers closed, not active use in the rain with cables plugged in. Real-world testing shows it shrugging off rainstorms and saltwater spray when sealed up, but leaving the ports exposed while charging or discharging in wet weather risks the electronics.
Which one is quieter?
The Explorer, by a wide margin — 30dB against the Pioneer's 50dB under load. That's a genuinely audible difference in a small room or overnight next to a CPAP.
Which one should I actually buy?
If this sets up once in an RV, garage, or basecamp and rarely gets carried, the Pioneer's extra capacity, IP65 sealing, and longer warranty are worth the weight. If you're the one lifting it — into a car, up stairs, across a campsite — the Explorer's 32 lbs and 30dB rating make it the one you'll actually want to use at the identical price.
Where to buy
BLUETTI Pioneer 150 AC240
$999.00
$999.00 list · direct from BLUETTI
Jackery Explorer 1000 PlusPick
$999.00
$999.00 list · direct from Jackery
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.