Head-to-head test
BLUETTI AC70 vs Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC
Real-world runtimes, scenario verdicts, and ownership costs compared — which wins for your use case.
Full profiles: BLUETTI AC70 → · Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC →
Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated
Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
.webp)
$359.00 · direct from BLUETTI
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
$249.95 · direct from Goal Zero
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Spec deltas
The BLUETTI AC70 (768Wh) and Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC (95Wh) sit in different weight classes. The real question: do your power needs justify the larger unit, or would you be overpaying for capacity that sits unused? The AC70 has a slight edge, but the margin is close enough that your use case should break the tie.
What the spec gap means in practice: the AC70's 1,000W inverter has the headroom for a window AC, a full-size fridge, and power tools. The Sherpa 100AC's 100W inverter can't run the heaviest of those — a window AC or a high-surge power tool needs more than it can hold, whatever its 150W surge ceiling does at the instant of startup. On stamina, the AC70 keeps a fridge alive for roughly 4 hours vs the Sherpa 100AC's 1 hours. The cost? Portability. At 22.5 lbs, the AC70 is heavy enough to make you think twice about moving it. The Sherpa 100AC at 2.1 lbs is something one person can actually carry.
Pick the AC70 if your primary use is cpap overnight or afternoon off-grid. Go with the Sherpa 100AC if its specific strengths below line up better with your use. Most buyers stop at the sticker price and miss this: over a full lifespan the AC70 works out to about $0.16/kWh against the Sherpa 100AC's $5.28, a gap that compounds in the AC70's favor the more you cycle it. Keep scrolling for the full breakdown. The scenario verdicts below hold a few surprises.
Bench Notes
What each unit does well, where it falls short, and the trade-offs that matter.
BLUETTI AC70
The 1,000W inverter handles most daily devices like laptops, blenders, and TVs, but will struggle with heating elements that require over 1500W. At only 22.5 lbs, it is exceptionally portable. You can easily carry it one-handed to a campsite or tailgating party. A standout feature is the value proposition: at roughly $0.47 per watt-hour, it's one of the most cost-effective options on the market.
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Longer warranty
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 3,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$109.1) than the Sherpa 100AC.
- –Significantly heavier (+20.4 lbs), making it harder to move.
Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC
At 100W, this unit is strictly for personal electronics (phones, laptops) and small CPAP machines. Do not expect to run kitchen appliances. At only 2.1 lbs, it is exceptionally portable. You can easily carry it one-handed to a campsite or tailgating party.
Strengths
- +Costs $109.1 less
- +Lighter by 20.4 lb
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-900W) limits appliance compatibility.
- –Lacks smartphone app control for remote monitoring.
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 500 charge cycles vs the AC70's 3,000, so it wears out sooner.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on seven real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the AC70 comes up 1,447Wh short (about 31% covered), the Sherpa 100AC 2,020Wh (4%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Neither unit
The Sherpa 100AC can start the 150W peak but not hold it — 150W of surge gets it going, then the 100W continuous rating takes over, so capacity never gets a say. This is the wrong size of unit for the job rather than a close call. The AC70 doesn't have the energy either — 653Wh usable against 1,645Wh, 992Wh short — so neither route works.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
AC70
The Sherpa 100AC doesn't finish — 80Wh usable against the 320Wh this needs leaves it 240Wh short, about 25% of the scenario covered. The AC70 covers it with 333Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 910Wh: the AC70 comes up 257Wh short (about 72% covered), the Sherpa 100AC 830Wh (9%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Neither unit
The Sherpa 100AC can't run the 400W peak at all — 150W is the most its inverter will pass even momentarily, so capacity never gets a say. This is the wrong size of unit for the job rather than a close call. The AC70 doesn't have the energy either — 653Wh usable against 670Wh, 17Wh short — so neither route works.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
The Sherpa 100AC can start the 150W peak but not hold it — 150W of surge gets it going, then the 100W continuous rating takes over, so capacity never gets a say. This is the wrong size of unit for the job rather than a close call. The AC70 doesn't have the energy either — 653Wh usable against 4,685Wh, 4,032Wh short — so neither route works.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
SCN-07 · an afternoon · needs 100Wh
Afternoon Off-Grid
Phones and a speaker at the park, beach, or campsite — the small-unit job description
AC70
The Sherpa 100AC doesn't finish — 80Wh usable against the 100Wh this needs leaves it 20Wh short, about 81% of the scenario covered. The AC70 covers it with 553Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger (×2) 30W×2h · Bluetooth Speaker 10W×4h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
Only the AC70 can start this 205W load.
$359 list · direct from BLUETTI
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–43.5hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–8.7hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–0.7h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 10, 2026
Verdict: the AC70, on Power Score margin
These two units are closely matched on individual specs, but our Power Score analysis gives the AC70 the edge with a composite score of 2,507 vs 682.
Overall score margin: 2,507 vs 682 (+267.6%)
List prices as of July 10, 2026. The links below open BLUETTI's and Goal Zero's current prices.
$359.00 · direct from BLUETTI
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the Sherpa 100AC price$249.95 list
Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 10, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): UPS, CPAP, Solar Generator, Tailgating, Apartment Balcony, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, AC70 rates 4.8/5 (89th percentile of 20 Compact-class units), and Sherpa 100AC rates 3.3/5 (1st percentile of 22 Personal-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
AC70: 45dB Published
45dB is about as loud as a running refrigerator. It is BLUETTI's own rating rather than a reading on a shared bench — makers differ on whether they quote a best case or a figure under load, so treat it as a starting point rather than what you would hear at a bedside. For most people, fan noise around 45dB and up is where sleep starts to suffer.
Sherpa 100AC: No App Control
Without app control, you have to physically walk to the Sherpa 100AC to check battery level, adjust settings, or monitor power draw. The AC70 lets you do all that from your phone, including getting low-battery alerts.
Surge Power: Inverter Quality Indicator
The AC70 has a 2× surge-to-continuous ratio vs the Sherpa 100AC's 1.5×, and the higher absolute ceiling with it — 2,000W against 150W. At 2× it clears the 2× rule of thumb for absorbing motor startups — fridges, AC compressors and power tools briefly draw 2-3× their rated wattage. What decides whether a given motor starts is the ceiling, not the ratio: the Sherpa 100AC still surges to 150W, so check the startup draw of the heaviest thing you plan to run against that figure rather than assuming it trips.
Only the AC70 Lists a UPS Mode
The AC70 can sit between the wall and your gear and hand it to battery when the grid drops — rated ≤20ms — fine on paper for routers and most electronics; the fussiest PC power supplies sit right at this line. Worth it for a router, a desktop PC, or a CPAP. The Sherpa 100AC's spec sheet lists no UPS mode, so anything plugged into it rides an outage only as far as your reaction time.
Warranty: 5 Years vs 2
The AC70 is covered for 5 years against the Sherpa 100AC's 2 years. The AC70's figure is a maximum rather than a guarantee — it depends on buying direct from BLUETTI or registering the unit, since reseller purchases carry a shorter term. An underrated factor if you're keeping this unit for years.
Battery Lifespan in Real Years
The AC70 is rated for 3,000 cycles vs 500. In real life: at daily use, that's 8.2 vs 1.4 years. At weekend use (twice a week), it's 29 vs 5 years. One caution reading years across different sizes: a cycle is 768Wh on the AC70 and 95Wh on the Sherpa 100AC, so count lifetime energy — roughly 2,304 kWh against 47 kWh over the rated life. After hitting the cycle limit, the battery doesn't die — it drops to ~80% of original capacity, which is still very usable.
Sherpa 100AC: Noise Level Not Disclosed
The AC70 publishes its noise level (45dB); the Sherpa 100AC doesn't publish one. That isn't evidence the Sherpa 100AC is louder — it means there's no figure to hold it to, and no way to compare the two on this without hearing them. If you're buying for a bedroom, a CPAP, or an apartment, treat the AC70's 45dB as the only published number on the table — a spec-sheet figure, not a measurement — and look for hands-on reports of the Sherpa 100AC before deciding.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the AC70.
Check AC70 price →or check the Sherpa 100AC priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The Sherpa 100AC is cheaper to buy, but the AC70 is cheaper to own. At $0.16/kWh over its lifetime vs $5.28/kWh, the AC70's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years.
Delivers each lifetime kWh for $5.12 less — check the AC70 price →
Brand trust
BLUETTI
Ecosystem
One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship portable (Apex 300, 2764.8Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.
Support
The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.
Community
Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.
Unique strength
Among the best capacity-to-price ratios available — several Elite and Apex units are the lowest $/Wh in the catalog. Widest product diversity including industry-firsts like sodium-ion cold-weather units and dual solar+alternator vehicle hubs. LFP across the rest of the range, though rated cycle life spans 2,500 (EB3A) to 6,000, and it varies WITHIN the Elite range rather than tracking it — the Elite 300 and Elite 200 V2 are rated 6,000 while the Elite 30 V2, Elite 10 Mini, Elite 320 and Elite 400 are rated 3,000+ and the Elite 100 V2 4,000+, so check the specific model. Dual-voltage (120V/240V) in flagships.
Worth knowing
Customer support inconsistency is the #1 risk factor. Older/discontinued units may become unrepairable — no spare parts policy for some models. Some reports of erratic communication from support agents.
Goal Zero
Ecosystem
Focused — a compact current line (6th-gen Yeti and Yeti Pro series), the previous-gen X series now out of stock across every model on Goal Zero's own store (checked 2026-09-13: 200X, 500X, 1000X, 1500X, 3000X, 6000X, some listed only as open-box), so buying one new means finding retailer stock, Sherpa power banks for the under-100Wh tier, plus Alta coolers, Nomad/Ranger solar panels, and vehicle integration kits
Support
US-based company (Salt Lake City, owned by NRG Energy). Historically considered premium support, but 2025-2026 reports describe long wait times, unresponsive email communication, and tickets going unaddressed for weeks. The "premium support justifies premium pricing" argument is weakening.
Community
Small but loyal — strong following in overlanding and preparedness communities. Official community forums were recently shuttered, frustrating long-time users.
App experience
Rated 4.4/5 iOS (~1,200 ratings) but recent reviews skew negative — recurring connectivity issues, crashes, and stability problems.
Unique strength
Pioneer of the portable power market — strongest brand heritage. US-based company with ruggedized, weather-resistant designs (IP ratings vary by model). Integrated "Yeti-Ready" ecosystem with coolers, lights, and vehicle kits.
Worth knowing
Typically the priciest brand per watt-hour — though individual pairings vary, and on some pages the Yeti is the cheaper energy. Support quality has declined from its "premium" standard. Perceived as competitively stagnant vs. faster-innovating Chinese competitors. Reliability reports on newer models are concerning.
Analyst note
Goal Zero positions itself as a premium brand with stronger support infrastructure, while BLUETTI competes on value. The question is whether the Goal Zero ecosystem and support premium is worth it for your use case.
Growth path
AC70
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 768Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 500W of solar. Suitable for a 1-2 panel setup.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Sherpa 100AC
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 95Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 60W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
Neither expands, and that's no knock on either — each is a complete unit at a fixed size. Buy the capacity that covers your needs now (the AC70 gives you the larger ceiling); you can't add to either later.
The Bottom Line
The full picture comes down to this. The AC70 edges ahead on our overall analysis, but the margin is narrow enough that your specific use case should drive the decision. Review the scenario verdicts above — if the Sherpa 100AC wins in the scenarios that match your life, it's the right choice regardless of aggregate scores.
If neither the AC70 nor the Sherpa 100AC feels like the right fit, your power needs probably sit outside what these two target. If you're planning whole-home backup or running power-hungry appliances (electric heaters, window AC), you'll want a larger system in the 3,000–5,000Wh range with expansion battery support. Prices on portable power stations fluctuate frequently. Both BLUETTI and Goal Zero discount regularly, so check the current price before committing. Prime Day and Black Friday pricing typically drops 20-30%.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the AC70 worth $109.1 more than the Sherpa 100AC?
The short answer: yes, if you'll actually use the extra capability. The AC70 costs $109.1 more, but that premium buys you 673.3Wh more battery capacity (that's 4 extra hours of running a mini-fridge); 900W higher AC output (opening the door to more demanding appliances); a longer-lasting battery rated for 3,000 cycles — that's 8 years at daily use; 440W faster solar charging for quicker off-grid recovery. On a cost-per-watt-hour basis, you're paying $0.47/Wh vs $2.64/Wh. Factor in cycle life and the math flips: the AC70 costs $0.16/kWh over its lifetime vs $5.28/kWh. The "expensive" unit is actually cheaper to own. For regular use, we'd pay the premium.
How does the 673.3Wh capacity difference actually affect daily use?
The AC70's 768Wh battery keeps a mini-fridge running for roughly 4 hours vs the Sherpa 100AC's 1 hours. What specs don't mention: runtime drops 20-30% in cold weather (below 32°F/0°C) as battery chemistry slows down. The AC70's extra capacity provides a critical cold-weather buffer. For occasional phone and laptop charging, both are overkill. This gap only matters for sustained, multi-appliance use.
Can I actually carry the AC70, or is the Sherpa 100AC the only portable option?
The Sherpa 100AC at 2.1 lbs is genuinely grab-and-go. Toss it in a backpack, carry it one-handed to a picnic, take it on a boat. The AC70 at 22.5 lbs is a different story. It's like carrying a large suitcase full of books. If you're setting up and breaking down camp frequently, this weight difference will exhaust you by day two.
How fast can each unit recharge from solar panels in real conditions?
On paper, the AC70 accepts 500W vs the Sherpa 100AC's 60W of solar input. What the spec sheet won't tell you: solar panels typically deliver only 60-80% of their rated output due to panel angle, cloud cover, and temperature. In realistic conditions, expect full recharge in about 2.2 hours for the AC70 and 2.3 hours for the Sherpa 100AC. That gap widens on cloudy days, when the AC70's higher input ceiling captures more of whatever sunlight is available. One more thing: summer gives you ~7 productive solar hours per day. Winter drops to ~4. If solar is your primary recharge method, the AC70's advantage is substantial.
"3,000 vs 500 cycles" — what does that actually mean for me?
In real years: the AC70 (3,000 cycles) lasts 8.2 years at daily use, 29 years at weekend use (twice a week), or 125 years at twice-monthly camping trips. The Sherpa 100AC (500 cycles): 1.4 years daily, 5 years weekends, or 21 years twice-monthly. What most people miss: hitting the cycle limit doesn't kill your battery. Capacity drops to about 80%. Your 768Wh unit becomes a ~614Wh unit. Still very usable. For weekend users, both batteries will outlast the warranty by years.
Can I use the AC70 as a home UPS to protect my electronics during blackouts?
Yes. The AC70 has UPS mode with true 0ms switchover (double-conversion). Even hospital-grade equipment won't notice. Plug in your desktop PC, router, NAS, or CPAP machine and it switches to battery seamlessly when the grid drops. The Sherpa 100AC does not have this feature. Without UPS, a blackout means: your PC reboots (potentially corrupting unsaved work), your NAS may corrupt its drive array, your CPAP alarms and wakes you up, and your security cameras go dark until you manually switch them over. If always-on power protection matters, this is a dealbreaker advantage for the AC70.
Is BLUETTI or Goal Zero more reliable for long-term ownership?
Both brands have strengths and trade-offs. BLUETTI: 2-6 years depending on model (up to 10 years on home backup systems). Response times vary significantly. Some reports of units being deemed unrepairable with no parts available for older models. Goal Zero: 5 years on LFP models, 2 years on older NMC models. Battery must be charged within 7 days of purchase and every 6 months to maintain warranty (strict). Product reliability concerns have increased — repeat "Battery Fault" errors reported even on newer Yeti Pro 4000. One piece of advice from the power station community: regardless of brand, buy from Costco or Amazon. Their return policies provide a safety net that manufacturer warranties alone can't match, especially for a product you'll rely on in emergencies. Both brands use LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries in their current lineup, the most proven chemistry for longevity and safety.
Bottom line: should I buy the AC70 or the Sherpa 100AC?
We'd pay the premium for the AC70. Yes, it costs more. The capability jump is real: you're stepping into a tier that handles appliances the base model can't start. The Sherpa 100AC is still solid if budget is the priority, but the AC70 will leave you less likely to wish you'd "gone bigger" six months from now. That regret costs more than the price difference.
Where to buy
BLUETTI AC70Pick
$359.00
$359.00 · direct from BLUETTI
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Goal Zero Sherpa 100AC
$249.95
$249.95 · direct from Goal Zero
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.