Head-to-head test
Anker SOLIX C300 vs Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
Real-world runtimes, scenario verdicts, and ownership costs compared — which wins for your use case.
Full profiles: Anker SOLIX C300 → · Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus →
Written by Ian SchneiderUpdated
Solar & Off-Grid Tester, Station Arena Test Desk
$329.99 · direct from Anker
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
No longer sold
Jackery no longer sells the Explorer 2000 Plus as a standalone unit — the listing now carries only kits, the add-on battery and a refurbished unit. Its successor in the line is the HomePower 2000 Plus v2: the same 2 kWh class with a 2,400W inverter in the newer design.
HomePower 2000 Plus v2 · $1,199.00Spec deltas
The Anker SOLIX C300 (288Wh) and Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus (2,043Wh) sit in different weight classes. The real question: do your power needs justify the larger unit, or would you be overpaying for capacity that sits unused? The Explorer 2000 Plus has a slight edge, but the margin is close enough that your use case should break the tie.
What the spec gap means in practice: the Explorer 2000 Plus's 3,000W inverter has the headroom for a window AC, a full-size fridge, and power tools. The SOLIX C300's 300W inverter can't run the heaviest of those — a window AC or a high-surge power tool needs more than it can hold, whatever its 600W surge ceiling does at the instant of startup. On stamina, the Explorer 2000 Plus keeps a fridge alive for roughly 12 hours vs the SOLIX C300's 2 hours. The cost? Portability. At 61.5 lbs, the Explorer 2000 Plus is heavy enough to make you think twice about moving it. The SOLIX C300 at 9.1 lbs is something one person can actually carry.
Pick the Explorer 2000 Plus if your primary use is 8-hour blackout or cpap overnight. Go with the SOLIX C300 if its specific strengths below line up better with your use. Most buyers stop at the sticker price and miss this: over a full lifespan the Explorer 2000 Plus works out to about $0.11/kWh against the SOLIX C300's $0.38, a gap that compounds in the Explorer 2000 Plus's favor the more you cycle it. Keep scrolling for the full breakdown. The scenario verdicts below hold a few surprises.
Bench Notes
What each unit does well, where it falls short, and the trade-offs that matter.
Anker SOLIX C300
At 300W, this unit is strictly for personal electronics (phones, laptops) and small CPAP machines. Do not expect to run kitchen appliances. At only 9.1 lbs, it is exceptionally portable. You can easily carry it one-handed to a campsite or tailgating party.
Strengths
- +Costs $569 less
- +Lighter by 52.4 lb
Trade-offs
- –Weaker inverter (-2,700W) limits appliance compatibility.
- –Sealed capacity — the Explorer 2000 Plus can add batteries to grow past 288Wh; this one can't.
- –Shorter-lived battery — rated for 3,000 charge cycles vs the Explorer 2000 Plus's 4,000, so it wears out sooner.
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
With a massive 3,000W output (and 6,000W surge), the Explorer 2000 Plus can run high-wattage appliances like space heaters, hair dryers, and electric grills without tripping. Weighing in at 61.5 lbs, this is not a unit you want to carry far. It's best suited as a stationary backup or RV companion. A standout feature is the value proposition: at roughly $0.44 per watt-hour, it's one of the most cost-effective options on the market.
Strengths
- +Larger battery capacity
- +Higher AC output
- +Faster solar charging
- +Rated for 4,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan
Trade-offs
- –Substantially more expensive (+$569) than the SOLIX C300.
- –Significantly heavier (+52.4 lbs), making it harder to move.
Will It Power Your Gear?
Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.
Scenario verdicts
We ran the math on seven real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.
SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh
Weekend Camping
Two nights off-grid with essential comfort
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 2,100Wh: the SOLIX C300 comes up 1,855Wh short (about 12% covered), the Explorer 2000 Plus 364Wh (83%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h
SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh
8-Hour Blackout
Keep the essentials running through a night without power
Explorer 2000 Plus
The SOLIX C300 doesn't finish — 245Wh usable against the 1,645Wh this needs leaves it 1,400Wh short, about 15% of the scenario covered. The Explorer 2000 Plus covers it with 91Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h
SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh
CPAP Overnight
Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case
Explorer 2000 Plus
The SOLIX C300 doesn't finish — 245Wh usable against the 320Wh this needs leaves it 75Wh short, about 76% of the scenario covered. The Explorer 2000 Plus covers it with 1,416Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD CPAP Machine 40W×8h
SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh
Remote Workday
Full work day off-grid without power anxiety
Explorer 2000 Plus
The SOLIX C300 doesn't finish — 245Wh usable against the 910Wh this needs leaves it 665Wh short, about 27% of the scenario covered. The Explorer 2000 Plus covers it with 826Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h
SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh
Tailgate Party
Game day power for the crew
Explorer 2000 Plus
The SOLIX C300 can start the 400W peak but not hold it — 600W of surge gets it going, then the 300W continuous rating takes over. The Explorer 2000 Plus handles this scenario with 1,066Wh to spare.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h
SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh
Van Life Daily
A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test
Neither unit
Neither unit covers this scenario's 4,685Wh: the SOLIX C300 comes up 4,440Wh short (about 5% covered), the Explorer 2000 Plus 2,949Wh (37%). This is well outside what either unit is for; the right answer here is a larger station, not a choice between these two.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h
SCN-07 · an afternoon · needs 100Wh
Afternoon Off-Grid
Phones and a speaker at the park, beach, or campsite — the small-unit job description
Either unit
This row is here for the SOLIX C300's class of job: phones and a speaker, 100Wh across an afternoon. Both cover it — the SOLIX C300 finishes at 41% used, and the Explorer 2000 Plus barely notices it. For this job the Explorer 2000 Plus's extra capacity is dead weight, not headroom; take the SOLIX C300 at 9.1 lbs and leave the rest at home.
Battery budget usedlower = more headroom
LOAD Phone Charger (×2) 30W×2h · Bluetooth Speaker 10W×4h
The Load Test
RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD
None of the scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.
Essentials
Comfort & Convenience
High-Draw Appliances
Test duration
8h
Continuous draw
205W
Projected runtime
For this load: Explorer 2000 Plus runs 8.5h vs 1.2h.
Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology
Runtime by appliance
Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹
Essentials
The basics you need runningscale 0–115.8hComfort & Convenience
Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–23.2hHigh-Draw Appliances
These reveal the real limitsscale 0–1.7h¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.
Conclusion
July 10, 2026
Verdict: the Explorer 2000 Plus, on Power Score margin
These two units are closely matched on individual specs, but our Power Score analysis gives the Explorer 2000 Plus the edge with a composite score of 4,114 vs 1,597.
Overall score margin: 1,597 vs 4,114 (−157.6%)
List prices as of July 10, 2026. The links below open Anker's and Jackery's current prices.
$899.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 21 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
or check the SOLIX C300 price$329.99 list
Written by Ian Schneider, Solar & Off-Grid Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 10, 2026
Measured Data
Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.
Benchmark scores
Not rated for both units (minimum threshold unmet): RV Living, Home Backup, CPAP, Solar Generator, Food Truck, Camping.
Full specifications
ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →
Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →How these numbers are produced
Numeric verification
Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.
Owner claims
Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews.
Runtime model
Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.
Power Score
Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.
See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →Class ranking (the star rating)
Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, SOLIX C300 rates 4.2/5 (52nd percentile of 22 Personal-class units), and Explorer 2000 Plus rates 4.5/5 (68th percentile of 26 Large-class units).
How the class ranking is computed →Test Notes & Caveats
Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.
Explorer 2000 Plus: 61.5 lbs Is a Commitment
At 61.5 lbs, this is manageable but not fun to move. That's heavier than a large checked suitcase. How much it costs you depends on whether it rolls — wheels and a telescoping handle change the job completely at this weight, and our spec record doesn't track them, so look at the product photos before you plan on carrying it from the car.
SOLIX C300: Fixed Capacity
The SOLIX C300 is sealed at 288Wh — fine if that covers you, but it's the ceiling. By contrast the Explorer 2000 Plus can add expansion batteries, though the first thing it has over the SOLIX C300 is its own 2,043Wh base — expansion is the step after that, for the buyer who would outgrow 2,043Wh as well.
UPS Switchover: ≤10ms vs ≤20ms
Both list a UPS mode, at different rated speeds. The SOLIX C300 is rated ≤10ms — quick enough on paper that desktop PCs and routers should ride through, treating that as the rating it is. The Explorer 2000 Plus is rated ≤20ms — fine on paper for routers and most electronics; the fussiest PC power supplies sit right at this line. If a computer with unsaved work is the thing being protected, the stated class is worth the attention; nothing here is a lab result.
Warranty: No Difference
Both units carry the same 5-year warranty, so coverage isn't a tiebreaker here. The Explorer 2000 Plus's figure is a maximum rather than a guarantee — it depends on registering the unit with Jackery, which is what extends the base term to the full period. Worth saying because the per-dollar framing can suggest otherwise: the SOLIX C300 works out at 15.2 years of cover per $1,000 spent against the Explorer 2000 Plus's 5.6, but that spread is the price gap, not the terms.
Battery Lifespan in Real Years
The Explorer 2000 Plus is rated for 4,000 cycles vs 3,000. In real life: at daily use, that's 11 vs 8.2 years. At weekend use (twice a week), it's 38 vs 29 years. One caution reading years across different sizes: a cycle is 2,043Wh on the Explorer 2000 Plus and 288Wh on the SOLIX C300, so count lifetime energy — roughly 8,171 kWh against 864 kWh over the rated life. After hitting the cycle limit, the battery doesn't die — it drops to ~80% of original capacity, which is still very usable.
Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Explorer 2000 Plus.
Check Explorer 2000 Plus price →or check the SOLIX C300 priceOwnership Analysis
What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.
Lifetime value
Service lifeyears at one full cycle per day
Lifetime energy delivered
Cost per delivered kWh
│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.
Analyst note
The SOLIX C300 is cheaper to buy, but the Explorer 2000 Plus is cheaper to own. At $0.11/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.38/kWh, the Explorer 2000 Plus's higher cycle life and capacity make each dollar go further over the years.
Delivers each lifetime kWh for $0.27 less — check the Explorer 2000 Plus price →
Brand trust
Anker
Ecosystem
7-8 SOLIX portable power stations across C-series (compact) and F-series (flagship), plus the X1 home energy system
Support
US-based support. Historically known for incredible no-hassle replacements, but recent reports describe AI-driven support agents giving generic responses and complex return logistics for heavy units (hazmat shipping). The Anker brand reputation is still strong, but SOLIX-specific support quality is trending down.
Community
Moderate — active Reddit (r/Anker, r/AnkerSOLIXCommunity) and growing. Benefits from Anker's massive consumer electronics brand awareness.
App experience
Rated 4.5/5 iOS (~1,100 ratings) · 4.3/5 Android
Unique strength
Parent brand trust from Anker's consumer electronics dominance. InfiniPower technology for long cycle life. Strong $/Wh value in the mid-size and larger units — the S2000, F2600 and C1000 are among the better buys per watt-hour in the catalog.
Worth knowing
Support quality appears to be declining from its historically excellent level. Firmware updates have removed features without warning. Expansion ecosystem is smaller than EcoFlow's.
Jackery
Ecosystem
12-15+ models across Explorer (portable) and HomePower (home backup) series, plus SolarSaga panel ecosystem and innovative form factors
Support
US-based support but widely criticized. Reddit reports describe slow/dismissive responses, scripted AI agents, strict receipt requirements for warranty claims, and refurbished replacements for clearly defective units. Strongly recommended: buy from Costco or Amazon for return protection.
Community
Smallest community of the major brands — Reddit r/Jackery has ~2,000 members. YouTube presence is solid due to brand recognition.
App experience
Rated 2.3-3.3/5 iOS and Android — the weakest app experience of the major brands. Multiple confusing apps (Jackery app vs Jackery Home) and mandatory login even offline.
Unique strength
Highest brand recognition and widest retail distribution (Costco, Home Depot, Best Buy, Amazon). The "Toyota" of power stations — dependable, proven, wide availability. Innovative form factors like the Solar Gazebo and Solar Mars Bot.
Worth knowing
A couple of older models still ship NMC chemistry with a shorter rated lifespan, so check the cycle rating on the specific unit — though most of the current line has moved to LFP. Generally perceived as overpriced for the specs offered compared to newer competitors. App experience is significantly behind rivals.
Analyst note
Anker and Jackery are close competitors. Both have established support channels and growing ecosystems. Compare their specific warranty terms and community size for your peace of mind.
Growth path
SOLIX C300
FIXED CAPACITYFixed at 288Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.
Accepts up to 100W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Explorer 2000 Plus
EXPANDABLESupports Jackery expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 2,043Wh.
Accepts up to 1,200W of solar. Enough for a serious multi-panel array.
Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.
Expansion batteries are Jackery-specific. You're investing in the Jackery ecosystem.
Realistic full solar rechargeat 70% of rated panel output — see methodology
Analyst note
The SOLIX C300 is sealed at 288Wh, which is fine if that covers you. The Explorer 2000 Plus starts at 2,043Wh and can grow beyond it with Jackery expansion batteries — real headroom the SOLIX C300 doesn't have if your needs climb toward partial-home backup.
What Owners Actually Report
Drawn from 21 comments on independent review channels — not from retailer reviews, which skew to the first week of ownership. Each line is our summary of one commenter's claim, linked to the original. We record what they said, including where it contradicts the spec sheet.
Anker SOLIX C300
14 claims from 11 comments · 9 from owners · 2 with figures
- Build quality
- 2 · 55% negative
- Other
- 3 · 0% negative
- Size & weight
- 2 · 21% negative
- Solar input
- 3 · 14% negative
- Durability
- 1 · 0% negative
What owners complain about
Returned it: temps hit 52C and above when recharging at 300-330W, with a terrible burning plastic smell.
Build qualitymeasuredowner5 agreedsource →
A 300W inverter cannot start a fridge or drive a drill, where a 600W unit can.
Inverter & surgesource →
Calls the tall tower form factor nonsense in a car camper where a flat, stable unit is needed.
Size & weightsource →
What owners praise
Prefers the Ankers for portable use in the car or beside a chair.
Size & weightowner34 agreedsource →
Better AC outlet spacing, more USB-C ports and a light; bought two after the EcoFlow issue.
Build qualityowner4 agreedsource →
Uses two Anker 300W stations to power video lights on film shoots instead of costly V-mount batteries.
Otherowner1 agreedsource →
Jackery Explorer 2000 Plus
15 claims from 10 comments · 11 from owners · 2 with figures
- Expandability
- 3 · 48% negative
- Solar input
- 2 · 0% negative
- Warranty & support
- 3 · 100% negative
- Price & value
- 2 · 88% negative
- Charging
- 1 · 100% negative
What owners complain about
The pairing connector box is way overpriced at $200.
Price & valuemeasuredownersource →
Has contacted Jackery too many times across four units and calls their support bad.
Warranty & supportownersource →
The 2000 Plus parallel kit did not do what he needed despite the spec talk.
Expandabilityownersource →
What owners praise
Feeds 4800W into the system across 8 DC ports; any input backfeeds and charges everything.
Solar inputmeasuredowner100 agreedsource →
Each expansion battery has its own controller, giving MPPT redundancy in a grid-down scenario.
Expandabilityowner100 agreedsource →
Switching his decision to Jackery on the reviewer's A grade over the AC300's A- and Delta's B-.
Other17 agreedsource →
Claims are weighted by how specific they are, whether the commenter owns the unit, and how many readers agreed. Comments that mention a product under a rival's review count for more, because the commenter had no reason to be there. This is what buyers report, not our test results — for measurements we ran ourselves, see the methodology.
The Bottom Line
The full picture comes down to this. The Explorer 2000 Plus edges ahead on our overall analysis, but the margin is narrow enough that your specific use case should drive the decision. Review the scenario verdicts above — if the SOLIX C300 wins in the scenarios that match your life, it's the right choice regardless of aggregate scores.
If neither the SOLIX C300 nor the Explorer 2000 Plus feels like the right fit, your power needs probably sit outside what these two target. Use our comparison tool above to explore alternatives that better match your specific wattage and runtime requirements. Prices on portable power stations fluctuate frequently. Both Anker and Jackery discount regularly, so check the current price before committing. Prime Day and Black Friday pricing typically drops 20-30%.
Frequently Asked Questions
Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.
Is the Explorer 2000 Plus worth $569 more than the SOLIX C300?
The short answer: yes, if you'll actually use the extra capability. The Explorer 2000 Plus costs $569 more, but that premium buys you 1,754.8Wh more battery capacity (that's 10 extra hours of running a mini-fridge); 2,700W higher AC output (opening the door to more demanding appliances); a longer-lasting battery rated for 4,000 cycles — that's 11 years at daily use; 1,100W faster solar charging for quicker off-grid recovery. On a cost-per-watt-hour basis, you're paying $0.44/Wh vs $1.15/Wh. Factor in cycle life and the math flips: the Explorer 2000 Plus costs $0.11/kWh over its lifetime vs $0.38/kWh. The "expensive" unit is actually cheaper to own. For regular use, we'd pay the premium.
How does the 1,754.8Wh capacity difference actually affect daily use?
The Explorer 2000 Plus's 2,042.8Wh battery keeps a mini-fridge running for roughly 12 hours vs the SOLIX C300's 2 hours. Where it really matters: during an 8-hour blackout running your fridge, router, lights, AND charging your phone simultaneously (about 1,645Wh total), the Explorer 2000 Plus handles it while the SOLIX C300 runs dry. What specs don't mention: runtime drops 20-30% in cold weather (below 32°F/0°C) as battery chemistry slows down. The Explorer 2000 Plus's extra capacity provides a critical cold-weather buffer. For occasional phone and laptop charging, both are overkill. This gap only matters for sustained, multi-appliance use.
Can I actually carry the Explorer 2000 Plus, or is the SOLIX C300 the only portable option?
The SOLIX C300 at 9.1 lbs is genuinely grab-and-go. Toss it in a backpack, carry it one-handed to a picnic, take it on a boat. The Explorer 2000 Plus at 61.5 lbs is a different story. It's like carrying a large suitcase full of books. If you're setting up and breaking down camp frequently, this weight difference will exhaust you by day two.
How fast can each unit recharge from solar panels in real conditions?
On paper, the Explorer 2000 Plus accepts 1,200W vs the SOLIX C300's 100W of solar input. What the spec sheet won't tell you: solar panels typically deliver only 60-80% of their rated output due to panel angle, cloud cover, and temperature. In realistic conditions, expect full recharge in about 2.4 hours for the Explorer 2000 Plus and 4.1 hours for the SOLIX C300. That gap widens on cloudy days, when the Explorer 2000 Plus's higher input ceiling captures more of whatever sunlight is available. One more thing: summer gives you ~7 productive solar hours per day. Winter drops to ~4. If solar is your primary recharge method, the Explorer 2000 Plus's advantage is substantial.
"4,000 vs 3,000 cycles" — what does that actually mean for me?
In real years: the Explorer 2000 Plus (4,000 cycles) lasts 11.0 years at daily use, 38 years at weekend use (twice a week), or 167 years at twice-monthly camping trips. The SOLIX C300 (3,000 cycles): 8.2 years daily, 29 years weekends, or 125 years twice-monthly. What most people miss: hitting the cycle limit doesn't kill your battery. Capacity drops to about 80%. Your 2,042.8Wh unit becomes a ~1,634Wh unit. Still very usable. For weekend users, both batteries will outlast the warranty by years.
What if I need more capacity than the SOLIX C300's 288Wh later?
The SOLIX C300 is sealed at 288Wh, so if you expect your needs to climb, the Explorer 2000 Plus is the more future-proof pick: it starts at 2,042.8Wh and adds Jackery-compatible batteries without replacing the base unit. That said, "not expandable" isn't a flaw on its own — if 288Wh comfortably covers your loads, the SOLIX C300 is a complete unit, not a downgrade.
Is Anker or Jackery more reliable for long-term ownership?
Both brands have strengths and trade-offs. Anker: 5-year warranty standard on portable stations, 10-year on home energy systems. Historically very reliable, though some recent firmware updates have altered product functionality without notice or rollback option. Jackery: 2-5 years depending on model (premium models like 5000 Plus get 5 years, budget models get 2 years). Registration required for extension. Claims process can be frustrating. One piece of advice from the power station community: regardless of brand, buy from Costco or Amazon. Their return policies provide a safety net that manufacturer warranties alone can't match, especially for a product you'll rely on in emergencies. Both brands use LFP (lithium iron phosphate) batteries in their current lineup, the most proven chemistry for longevity and safety.
Bottom line: should I buy the SOLIX C300 or the Explorer 2000 Plus?
We'd pay the premium for the Explorer 2000 Plus. Yes, it costs more. The capability jump is real: you're stepping into a tier that handles appliances the base model can't start. The SOLIX C300 is still solid if budget is the priority, but the Explorer 2000 Plus will leave you less likely to wish you'd "gone bigger" six months from now. That regret costs more than the price difference.
Check Explorer 2000 Plus price →
Where to buy
Anker SOLIX C300
$329.99
$329.99 · direct from Anker
Last checked 1 day ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Jackery Explorer 2000 PlusPick
$899.00
$899.00 · direct from Jackery
Last checked 21 days ago. Prices move — check before you buy.
Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.