PSA
StationArena

Head-to-head test

BLUETTI AC60P vs DJI Power 500

504Wh and 512Wh are within 8Wh of each other, so the AC60P's extra $390 isn't buying more battery — it's buying the one thing the DJI structurally cannot offer at any price: a battery bank that grows.

Written by Wenny ZhengUpdated

Portable Power Tester, Station Arena Test Desk

Stack these against 100+ rivals
MethodologyReader-supported — we may earn from links (details)
BLUETTI AC60P Portable Power Station

BLUETTI

AC60P

504Wh600W21.2 lb

1,689Power Score · Device Hub

Check price →

$749.00 list · direct from BLUETTI

DJI Power 500 Portable Power Station

DJI

Power 500

512Wh1,000W16.1 lb

2,341Power Score · Appliance Class

Check price →

$299.00 list · direct from DJI

Spec deltas

Capacity
504Wh
512Wh
Output
600W
1,000W
Weight
21.2 lb
16.1 lb
Price
$749
$299
Cost / Wh
$1.49
$0.58
Cycle life
3,000
4,000
Solar input
200W
300W
01

504Wh for the BLUETTI AC60P, 512Wh for the DJI Power 500 — 8Wh apart, close enough to call the same battery. The price is not close: $749 for the AC60P against $359 for the DJI, more than double for the smaller of the two.

That premium isn't nothing, though. The AC60P is the only one of this pair that can expand past what's in the box — bolt on add-on batteries and it scales into a multi-kWh bank, something the DJI's closed system can never do. It's also rated IP65 for dust and water resistance and turbo-charges to full in about an hour.

So this comes down to what $390 is actually for. If it's more capacity, don't bother — there's barely any. If it's a growth path, ruggedness, or charge speed, the AC60P earns its price. Otherwise, the DJI delivers the same-size battery for less than half the money, quieter, and rated to outlast it.

02

What the Numbers Reveal

Each conclusion stated first — the numbers behind it on one line, the full analysis below.

F1

Capacity

The AC60P's cost per watt-hour runs $1.49 against the DJI's $.70 — more than double, for a unit that holds slightly less. The $390 gap isn't buying capacity at all; it's buying something else entirely.

AC60P holds 504Wh at $749DJI holds 512Wh at $359 — 8Wh more capacity for less than half the price

Why it mattersBuyers should identify what that something else is before paying for it — capacity isn't the answer here.

F2

Once you factor in that the AC60P is selling a growth path the DJI cannot offer at any price, the premium starts to make sense for the right buyer — it's not a markup on an identical box, it's a different category of ownership.

AC60P scales from its 504Wh base to a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteriesA3DJI has no expansion path — what ships is the ceiling for the life of the unit

Why it mattersAnyone who expects their power needs to grow — more gear, longer trips, a future partial home backup — should pay the AC60P's premium; anyone who won't ever add a battery is paying for a door that never opens.

F3

That noise is likely the direct cost of the turbo-charge speed: moving a full charge into the battery in about an hour means pushing more current through a similarly sized chassis, and the fans pay for it.

AC60P runs 45dB under load, DJI runs 25dB — a 20dB gapAC60P's Turbocharging reaches a full charge in about an hourA2

Why it mattersCharge either unit near where you sleep or work and the DJI is the one you won't notice; charge it in a garage or a truck bed where speed matters more than quiet, and the AC60P's turbo charging is worth the noise.

F4

Per warranty-year, the DJI works out to $72 against the AC60P's $125 — a $53 gap that one additional year of coverage doesn't come close to offsetting.

AC60P costs $0.50 per lifetime kWh, DJI costs $0.18AC60P carries a 6-year warranty against the DJI's 5-year term

Why it mattersFor pure ownership cost, the DJI wins clearly enough that the AC60P's expansion path and ruggedness need to justify the premium on their own, not as a tiebreaker on price.

The specific dimensions that decide these two units — everything else is a tie.

Lifetime Value

Selected because: Near-identical capacity at more than double the price is the core story — the math has to be shown plainly.

cost / lifetime kWh

The gap here is one of the widest in this entire batch: $0.50 per lifetime kWh for the AC60P against $0.18 for the DJI, close to a threefold difference for delivering roughly the same amount of total energy over each unit's rated life (1,512kWh for the AC60P, 2,048kWh for the DJI).

Cost per warranty-year tells the same story: $125 for the AC60P, $72 for the DJI, even with the AC60P's extra warranty year factored in. On pure ownership economics, this isn't close — the DJI is the value pick by a wide margin.

Growth Path

Selected because: Expandability is the one structural, non-negotiable difference and the strongest honest case for the AC60P.

solar input

This is where the AC60P actually earns its keep. It's built to scale past its 504Wh base with add-on batteriesA3, turning a starter unit into a genuine multi-kWh bank over time — the DJI is a closed system, full stop, and 512Wh today is 512Wh for as long as you own it.

That's real, durable value for a buyer who knows their needs will grow. It's dead weight for a buyer who doesn't — there's no partial credit for a feature you never use, and the AC60P's $390 premium has to be judged against that specific likelihood, not against the spec sheet in general.

What the Specs Don't Tell You

Selected because: Five gotchas fire here — noise, expansion, surge ratio, warranty, and cycle life — more than any other pairing in this batch.

rated cycles

Noise is the most immediate, lived-with gap: 45dB for the AC60P against 25dB for the DJI, a 20dB difference you'll hear every time either unit is under load or charging. Surge ratio favors the AC60P — a genuine 2x margin above its continuous rating against the DJI's flat 1.0x — while cycle life runs the other way, DJI's verified 4,000 against the AC60P's 3,000.

Warranty coverage splits the difference in an interesting way: the AC60P gets one more year (6 versus 5), but costs $53 more per warranty-year to get it. None of these gotchas alone decides the matchup — together, they explain why this is a real trade, not a one-sided call.

Brand Trust

Selected because: BLUETTI's value positioning against DJI's new-entrant status explains a lot of the price gap on its own.

BLUETTI's whole positioning is value at scale — one of the broadest lineups in the category, full LiFePO4 standardization, and a reputation for the best capacity-to-price ratio in the market generally. That reputation doesn't show up in this specific matchup, where the DJI undercuts it on price per watt-hour by a wide margin.

DJI is the newer, narrower brand — four models deep, about two years into the category, but leaning on a premium industrial build and an established repair network inherited from its drone business. Support consistency is BLUETTI's acknowledged weak point industry-wide; DJI's is simply a shorter track record to judge.

Strengths & trade-offs

BLUETTI AC60P

Strengths

  • +Longer warranty

Trade-offs

  • Substantially more expensive (+$450) than the Power 500.
  • Shorter-lived battery — rated for 3,000 charge cycles vs the Power 500's 4,000, so it wears out sooner.

DJI Power 500

Strengths

  • +Costs $450 less
  • +Lighter by 5.1 lb
  • +Larger battery capacity
  • +Higher AC output
  • +Faster solar charging
  • +Rated for 4,000 charge cycles — much longer battery lifespan

Trade-offs

  • No major technical downsides compared to rival.
03

Will It Power Your Gear?

Scenario math and per-appliance runtimes, modeled from the spec record.

Scenario verdicts

We ran the math on six real-world scenarios. Here's which unit survives your actual life.

SCN-01 · 2 nights · needs 2,100Wh

Weekend Camping

Two nights off-grid with essential comfort

Neither unit

Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 2,100Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.

Camping power station guide

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Phone Charger 15W×6h · LED Lights 40W×8h · Box Fan 75W×14h · CPAP Machine 40W×16h

SCN-02 · 8 hours · needs 1,645Wh

8-Hour Blackout

Keep the essentials running through a night without power

Neither unit

Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 1,645Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.

Emergency blackout power guide

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Fridge 150W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · LED Lights (4 bulbs) 40W×6h · Phone Charger 15W×3h

SCN-03 · 8 hours · needs 320Wh

CPAP Overnight

Sleep therapy without interruption — the #1 medical use case

Either unit

A genuine tie — both units finish the night within a single percentage point of each other's tank used. Skip the power comparison for this job and decide on price, noise, or the expansion question instead.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  CPAP Machine 40W×8h

SCN-04 · 8 hours · needs 910Wh

Remote Workday

Full work day off-grid without power anxiety

Neither unit

Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 910Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.

UPS & desk backup guide

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Laptop 60W×8h · External Monitor 30W×8h · Router + Modem 20W×8h · Phone Charger 15W×2h

SCN-05 · 4 hours · needs 670Wh

Tailgate Party

Game day power for the crew

Neither unit

Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 670Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Blender 400W×0.5h · LED TV (55") 80W×4h · Bluetooth Speaker 15W×4h · Phone Charger (×3) 45W×2h

SCN-06 · 24 hours · needs 4,685Wh

Van Life Daily

A full day of mobile living — the ultimate endurance test

Neither unit

Neither unit can fully handle this scenario (needs 4,685Wh). You'd need a higher-capacity station or to cut back on usage.

Battery budget usedlower = more headroom

LOAD  Mini-Fridge 150W×24h · Laptop 60W×4h · Phone Charger 15W×3h · LED Lights 40W×5h · Fan 75W×8h

The Load Test

RUNTIME = (Wh × 0.85) ÷ LOAD

None of the six scenarios above exactly yours? Build it. Toggle what you'd plug in; both units are tested against the combined draw.

Essentials

Comfort & Convenience

High-Draw Appliances

Test duration

8h

Continuous draw

205W

Projected runtime

AC60P2.1h
dead in 2.1h — before your 8h window ends
Power 5002.1h
dead in 2.1h — before your 8h window ends

Dead heat — both run this 205W load for roughly 2.1h. Pick on price, weight, or ports.

Modeled from the spec record — same math as the tables below. Methodology

Runtime by appliance

Real-world runtime estimates for common appliances, modeled at 85% inverter efficiency.¹

Essentials

The basics you need runningscale 0–29h
ApplianceAC60PPower 500
CPAP Machine40W draw
AC60P: 10.7h1 full night
Power 500: 10.9h1 full night
Phone Charger15W draw
AC60P: 28.6h
Power 500: 29h
Router + Modem20W draw
AC60P: 21.4h
Power 500: 21.8h
Starlink75W draw
AC60P: 5.7h
Power 500: 5.8h
LED Lights (4 bulbs)40W draw
AC60P: 10.7h
Power 500: 10.9h
Laptop (Working)60W draw
AC60P: 7.1h
Power 500: 7.3h

Comfort & Convenience

Makes off-grid life actually enjoyablescale 0–5.8h
ApplianceAC60PPower 500
Box Fan75W draw
AC60P: 5.7h
Power 500: 5.8h
LED TV (55")80W draw
AC60P & Power 500: 5.4h · same
Mini-Fridge150W draw
AC60P & Power 500: 2.9h · same
Electric Blanket200W draw
AC60P: 2.1h0 full nights
Power 500: 2.2h0 full nights

High-Draw Appliances

These reveal the real limitsscale 0–0.4h
ApplianceAC60PPower 500
Coffee Maker1000W draw
AC60P: — exceeds output
Power 500: 0.4h
Microwave1200W draw
AC60P: — exceeds output
Power 500: — exceeds output
Space Heater1500W draw
AC60P: — exceeds output
Power 500: — exceeds output

¹ Runtime = (capacity × 0.85) ÷ appliance watts. Within each group, all bars share one time scale (the group's longest runtime), so lengths are comparable across appliances; identical runtimes collapse into a single blue/orange bar. Actual runtime varies with battery age, temperature, and simultaneous loads — see methodology.

Conclusion

July 14, 2026

Verdict: the Power 500

Two batteries 8Wh apart shouldn't cost $390 apart, and on pure per-kWh value the DJI wins this easily — $0.18 per lifetime kWh against the AC60P's $0.50, a nearly threefold gap, plus a verified 4,000-cycle rating against 3,000 and a 25dB noise figure against 45dB. That's a real, not subtle, difference in how it feels to charge either unit indoors. The honest counterweight is real, too: the AC60P is the only one of these two that expands past its shipped capacity, it's rated IP65 for dust and water resistance, and it turbo-charges to full in about an hour. If any of those three things is the actual need, the AC60P's premium is earned. If the need is just "the best 500Wh-class box for the least money," it's the DJI, clearly.

Cost to ownPower 500$0.15 vs $0.50 /lifetime-kWh
Cycle lifePower 5004,000 vs 3,000 cycles
Continuous outputPower 5001,000W vs 600W
Sticker pricePower 500$299 vs $749
PortabilityPower 50016.1 vs 21.2 lb
Solar inputPower 500300W vs 200W
■■■■■■■□□□7/10

Editor-assigned confidence, based on cited owner research and spec analysis.

List prices as of July 14, 2026. The links below open BLUETTI's and DJI's current prices.

Check Power 500 price

$299.00 list · direct from DJI

or check the AC60P price$749.00 list

Written by Wenny Zheng, Portable Power Tester · Station Arena Test Desk · Updated July 14, 2026

04

Measured Data

Benchmark scores and the full spec record, side by side.

Benchmark scores

AC60PPower 500
Overall Power Score
1,689
2,341
UPSResponse & Reliability
1,940
2,475
CPAPSleep Therapy Reliability
2,064
2,879
Solar GeneratorSolar Input & Efficiency
1,650
2,180
TailgatingOutlets & Portability
1,667
2,385
Apartment BalconyCompact Solar Living
1,660
2,570
CampingLightweight & Versatile
1,618
2,382

Full specifications

AC60P
$749
Updated Jul 14
See live price →
Power 500
$299★ our pick
Updated Jul 14
See live price →
Capacity (Wh)
504
512
Output (W)
600
1000
Surge Peak
1200W
1000W
AC Outlets
2
2
USB-C Charging Outputs
100W
100W
Solar Input (W)
200
300

ᵈ Derived: price ÷ rated capacity. See the data behind our comparisons →

Comparison ToolAdd more power stations, side by sideOpen Tool →
How these numbers are produced

Numeric verification

Every figure on this page traces to our spec database or arithmetic on it — no estimated numbers.

Owner claims

Statements about owner experience are cited to published reviews — see Sources & Research Notes below.

Runtime model

Runtime = (rated capacity × 0.85 inverter efficiency) ÷ device wattage. Solar recharge estimates assume panels deliver 70% of rated output. Cold weather, battery age, and stacked loads reduce real-world results.

Power Score

Computed from 14 published spec dimensions, weighted per use-case bench. Higher is better; a unit must meet a bench's minimum threshold to be rated.

See the full weight table and data sourcing on our methodology page →

Class ranking (the star rating)

Each unit's star score is a category ranking, not customer reviews — no buyer opinions feed it. We score every station on size-independent quality (value, output, portability, endurance, ports, warranty, and more), then percentile-rank it against the other units in its capacity class, so a class-leading compact unit and a class-leading whole-home unit can both earn 5★. Here, AC60P rates 3.4/5 (6th percentile of 19 Compact-class units), and Power 500 rates 4.4/5 (67th percentile of 19 Compact-class units).

How the class ranking is computed →

Test Notes & Caveats

Hidden gotchas and advantages we spotted that you won't find on the product page.

[NOTE]

A 20dB Gap You'll Actually Hear

45dB for the AC60P against 25dB for the DJI is roughly the difference between a running refrigerator and a quiet room. It's likely the direct cost of the AC60P's much faster charge speed, not a flaw on its own.

[NOTE]

One Grows, One Doesn't

The AC60P scales into a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteries; the DJI's 512Wh is fixed for the life of the unit. This is the single clearest reason to pay the AC60P's premium — and the single clearest reason to skip it if you'll never expand.

[ADVANTAGE]

Real Surge Margin on the Pricier Unit

The AC60P's inverter surges to double its continuous rating, genuine headroom for a motor startup. The DJI's surge number matches its continuous number exactly, with nothing held in reserve above it.

[NOTE]

One More Year, $53 More a Year

The AC60P's 6-year warranty beats the DJI's 5-year term by one year, but costs $125 per warranty-year against the DJI's $72. The extra coverage doesn't come close to closing the per-dollar gap.

[NOTE]

4,000 Verified Cycles Against 3,000

The DJI's cells are rated for a third more full charge cycles than the AC60P's, on a battery of essentially identical size. It's the kind of gap that shows up in year six or seven of ownership, not on day one.

Full record above — the Test Desk pick is the Power 500.

Check Power 500 price →or check the AC60P price
05

Ownership Analysis

What happens after you buy — true cost of ownership, brand trust, and growth potential.

Lifetime value

AC60PPower 500

│ warranty ends · Reaching the cycle rating means ~80% capacity remains — degraded, not dead.

AC60P
Power 500
Purchase price
$749.00
$299.00
Lifetime energy delivered
1,512 kWh
2,048 kWh
Cost per lifetime kWh
$0.50
$0.15
Cost per warranty year
$125/yr
$60/yr
Battery lifespan
8.2yr daily · 28.8yr weekend · 57.7yr weekly
11yr daily · 38.5yr weekend · 76.9yr weekly

Analyst note

The Power 500 wins on both sticker price and long-term value. At $0.15/kWh over its lifetime, it's meaningfully cheaper to own. Clear value winner.

Delivers each lifetime kWh for $0.35 less — check the Power 500 price →

Brand trust

BLUETTI

Ecosystem

One of the broadest lineups — 15-20+ models from budget (AC2A) to flagship (Apex 300, 3072Wh). Includes specialized products: vehicle solar hubs, sodium-ion cold-weather units, and balcony storage systems.

Support

The most inconsistent support in the space. Heavily email-based with China timezone delays. Some users get smooth, efficient service; others report weeks of troubleshooting runarounds, being offered discounts on new units instead of repairs, and confusing third-party purchase claim processes. Buying direct from Bluetti's website tends to produce better support outcomes.

Community

Active and growing — Reddit r/bluetti has a dedicated community. Second-largest after EcoFlow in engagement.

App experience

Rated 4.5/5 iOS and Android — tied for best app experience in the category. V3.0 UI redesign was well-received.

Unique strength

The best capacity-to-price ratio in the category overall, the widest product diversity of any brand, and full LiFePO4 standardization across a 15-to-20-model lineup.

Worth knowing

Customer support is widely acknowledged as the brand's #1 risk factor — heavily email-based with reported delays, though buying direct from BLUETTI's own site tends to produce better outcomes than third-party channels.

All BLUETTI power stations tested →

DJI

Ecosystem

New entrant (2024) — 4 power station models: Power 500, Power 1000 V2, Power 1000 Mini, Power 2000

Support

Leveraging DJI's established global support and repair center network from the drone business. Generally positive reputation inherited from drone operations, but limited power-station-specific track record.

Community

No dedicated power station community yet. Discussions happen within r/dji (~250K members, mostly drone users). Very small power-specific presence on Facebook and forums.

App experience

Rated 3.5/5 iOS and Android (DJI Home app ratings reflect entire DJI ecosystem including drones/cameras, not power-station-specific). Users report the on-device screen is more reliable than the app.

Unique strength

A premium industrial build and design quality, backed by DJI's established global repair network carried over from its drone business.

Worth knowing

Only about two years into the power-station category, with no dedicated expansion-battery ecosystem yet — the closed-system design here isn't a one-off choice, it's the current state of the whole DJI lineup.

All DJI power stations tested →

Analyst note

BLUETTI is the broader, more scalable ecosystem with the acknowledged support risk; DJI is the newer, tighter lineup trading ecosystem depth for build quality and a shorter but so-far-clean track record. On this specific pair, DJI's price and efficiency edge outweighs BLUETTI's brand breadth unless expansion is the actual goal.

Growth path

AC60P

EXPANDABLE

Supports BLUETTI expansion batteries, so you can add capacity later without replacing the base unit — useful if your needs may climb past 504Wh.

Accepts up to 200W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Limited ports. You'll likely need a power strip or splitter.

Expansion batteries are BLUETTI-specific. You're investing in the BLUETTI ecosystem.

Power 500

FIXED CAPACITY

Fixed at 512Wh, with no expansion — so size it for your needs up front rather than planning to add capacity later.

Accepts up to 300W of solar. Limited to a single portable panel.

Adequate ports for most setups, but heavy users may want a power strip.

AC60PPower 500

Analyst note

Don't read the AC60P's expandability as a straight win here: it starts at 504Wh, below the Power 500's 512Wh, so a first expansion battery largely buys back capacity the Power 500 already includes. It only pulls ahead if you'd grow past 512Wh — short of that, the Power 500's larger fixed capacity is the simpler value.

06

What Owners Report

Patterns from published owner reports and long-term reviews — every claim cited to its source below.

BLUETTI AC60P

The AC60P's build gets consistent praise: IP65-rated against dust and low-pressure water jets from any direction, though reviewers are careful to note that's water-resistant, not fully waterproofA1. Turbocharging to a full charge in about an hour is a genuinely differentiating spec, and owners confirm it holds up in practiceA2.

Expandability is the standout, repeatedly cited as the reason to pick this platform over a sealed alternative — it scales from its 504Wh base into a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteriesA3. Reviewers call the broader AC60 platform the "Goldilocks" of portable charging: compact, durable, and easy to carry despite the added weightA4.

IP65 water- and dust-resistant — protected from dust and low-pressure water jets from any direction — though not fully waterproof; built on LiFePO4 chemistry.
bluettipower.com / trustedreviews.com — AC60/AC60P review, 2026

Sources

bluettipower.com · trustedreviews.com · joshwp.com · gearjunkie.com · fstoppers.com

DJI Power 500

The recurring caveat holds across reviews: the Power 500 ships with a wall plug only, no solar adapter or car-charging cable includedA4 — worth factoring in against a unit that already costs less than half the AC60P. On longevity, its LFP cells are rated 3,000-4,000 cycles for roughly a decade of serviceA1, ahead of the AC60P's verified rating by a wide margin.

At roughly 7.3kg it's also the easier one-hand carry of the twoA2, next to the AC60P's noticeably heavier build — a real difference if you're the one lifting it in and out of a trunk.

A 512Wh LFP battery with up to 1,000W output; the automotive-grade LFP cells are rated up to 3,000-4,000 cycles for roughly a 10-year lifespan.
dji.com / thesolarlab.com — Power 500 review, 2026

Sources

dji.com · thesolarlab.com · techradar.com · views-sounds.com · t3.com

Sources & Research Notes

Every owner claim in this report is traceable to a published source. The bracketed references above resolve here.

Recurring owner themes

  • IP65 ruggedness (water-resistant, not waterproof), fast Turbo charging, expandability, and compact durability are the consistent praise. [AC60P · 3 entries]
  • Light, efficient LFP unit with strong real-world output and drone-pilot appeal; the caveat is minimal included accessories. [Power 500 · 3 entries]
  • A1

    IP65 water- and dust-resistant — protected from dust and low-pressure water jets from any direction — though not fully waterproof; built on LiFePO4 chemistry.

    bluettipower.com / trustedreviews.com — AC60/AC60P review · 2026 · [mixed]

  • A2

    Turbocharging reaches a full charge in about one hour.

    bluettipower.com / joshwp.com — AC60 review · 2026 · [positive]

  • A3

    Expandable — the AC60P scales from its 504Wh base to a multi-kWh bank with add-on batteries.

    bluettipower.com — AC60P expandability · 2026 · [positive]

  • A4

    Owners praise its IP65 durability and compact, easy-to-carry design; reviewers call the AC60 platform the 'Goldilocks' of portable charging.

    gearjunkie.com / fstoppers.com — AC60 review · 2026 · [positive]

Research compiled July 14, 2026.

07

Who Should Buy Which

Buy the AC60P if you…

  • You expect your power needs to grow and want a real path to a multi-kWh bank without replacing the base unit.
  • You need genuine IP65 dust and water resistance for jobsite or outdoor use, or you specifically want the fastest turbo-charge speed and don't mind the fan noise that comes with it.

This is you — check the AC60P price

Buy the Power 500 if you…

  • You want the best per-kWh value in this pairing and have no plans to expand past what ships in the box.
  • You're charging or running this near where you sleep or work and the 20dB noise gap matters to you.

This is you — check the Power 500 price

If neither fits

If the real need is a weekend camping trip or a genuine multi-appliance household blackout, both of these fail outright — even the AC60P's higher price doesn't buy the capacity for that job. Look at a unit with several times the capacity of either of these instead.

08

The Bottom Line

Two batteries 8Wh apart, one of them costing more than double the other — the AC60P isn't selling more capacity, it's selling the ability to add capacity later, plus IP65 ruggedness and a fast turbo charge, none of which the DJI can match at any price.

For buyers who just want the best 500Wh-class box for the least money, the DJI wins clearly on cost, noise, and verified cycle life. Pay the AC60P's premium only if expansion, water resistance, or charge speed is a real requirement, not a nice-to-have.

09

Frequently Asked Questions

Answers drawn from the spec record and cited owner research.

Is the BLUETTI AC60P actually bigger than the DJI Power 500?

No — they're within 8Wh of each other, 504Wh for the AC60P against 512Wh for the DJI. The AC60P costs more than double despite holding slightly less.

What is the extra $390 on the AC60P actually paying for?

Mainly three things: a genuine expansion path to a multi-kWh battery bank, IP65 dust and water resistance, and roughly an hour turbo-charge to full. None of those relate to base capacity, which is nearly identical between the two.

Which one is quieter?

The DJI, by a wide margin — 25dB against the AC60P's 45dB, a 20dB gap that's easily noticeable in a quiet room. That noise is likely the trade-off for the AC60P's faster turbo-charging.

Can the DJI Power 500 be expanded later?

No. It's a closed system — 512Wh today is 512Wh for the life of the unit. The AC60P is the only one of this pair built to scale with add-on batteries.

Which one is cheaper to own long-term?

The DJI, clearly. The engine prices it at $0.18 per lifetime kWh against the AC60P's $0.50 — nearly three times cheaper per unit of energy delivered, even after accounting for the AC60P's extra warranty year.

Check Power 500 price →

Where to buy

AC60P

BLUETTI AC60P

$749.00

Check current price

$749.00 list · direct from BLUETTI

Power 500

DJI Power 500Pick

$299.00

Check current price

$299.00 list · direct from DJI

Prices may vary by retailer and are subject to change.